Literature DB >> 25423010

Predicting Patients with Inadequate 24- or 48-Hour Urine Collections at Time of Metabolic Stone Evaluation.

Barry B McGuire1, Yasin Bhanji1, Vidit Sharma1, Brendan T Frainey1, Megan McClean1, Caroline Dong1, Kalen Rimar1, Kent T Perry1, Robert B Nadler1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to understand the characteristics of patients who are less likely to submit adequate urine collections at metabolic stone evaluation.
METHODS: Inadequate urine collection was defined using two definitions: (1) Reference ranges for 24-hour creatinine/kilogram (Cr/24) and (2) discrepancy in total 24-hour urine Cr between 24-hour urine collections. There were 1502 patients with ≥1 kidney stone between 1998 and 2014 who performed a 24- or 48-hour urine collection at Northwestern Memorial Hospital and who were identified retrospectively. Multivariate analysis was performed to analyze predictor variables for adequate urine collection.
RESULTS: A total of 2852 urine collections were analyzed. Mean age for males was 54.4 years (range 17-86), and for females was 50.2 years (range 8-90). One patient in the study was younger than 17 years old. (1) Analysis based on the Cr 24/kg definition: There were 50.7% of patients who supplied an inadequate sample. Females were nearly 50% less likely to supply an adequate sample compared with men, P<0.001. Diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.42 [1.04-1.94], P=0.026) and vitamin D supplementation (OR 0.64 [0.43-0.95], P=0.028) predicted receiving an adequate/inadequate sample, respectively. (2) Analysis based on differences between total urinary Cr: The model was stratified based on percentage differences between samples up to 50%. At 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and 50% differences, inadequate collections were achieved in 82.8%, 66.9%, 51.7%, 38.5%, and 26.4% of patients, respectively. Statistical significance was observed based on differences of ≥40%, and this was defined as the threshold for an inadequate sample. Female sex (OR 0.73 [0.54-0.98], P=0.037) predicted supplying inadequate samples. Adequate collections were more likely to be received on a Sunday (OR 1.6 [1.03-2.58], P=0.038) and by sedentary workers (OR 2.3 [1.12-4.72], P=0.023).
CONCLUSION: Urine collections from patients during metabolic evaluation for nephrolithiasis may be considered inadequate based on two commonly used clinical definitions. This may have therapeutic or economic ramifications and the propensity for females to supply inadequate samples should be investigated further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25423010     DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

Review 1.  Improving Compliance with 24-H Urine Collections: Understanding Inadequacies in the Collection Process and Risk Factors for Poor Compliance.

Authors:  Alice Xiang; Alex Nourian; Eric Ghiraldi; Justin I Friedlander
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Accuracy in 24-hour Urine Collection at a Tertiary Center.

Authors:  Carter Boyd; Kyle Wood; Dustin Whitaker; Omotola Ashorobi; Lisa Harvey; Robert Oster; Ross P Holmes; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2018

3.  Association Between Randall's Plaque Stone Anchors and Renal Papillary Pits.

Authors:  Michael S Borofsky; James C Williams; Casey A Dauw; Andrew Cohen; Andrew C Evan; Fredric L Coe; Elaine Worcester; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  Integration and utilization of modern technologies in nephrolithiasis research.

Authors:  Michael S Borofsky; Casey A Dauw; Andrew Cohen; James C Williams; Andrew P Evan; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Difference in 24-Hour Urine Composition between Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Adults without Nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Wei Zhu; Zanlin Mai; Jing Qin; Xiaolu Duan; Yang Liu; Zhijian Zhao; Jian Yuan; Shaw P Wan; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Predictive Factors for Achieving the Recommended AUA Daily Urine Production in Patients With Nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  Kimberly Tay; Anojan Navaratnam; Sean McAdams; Mira Keddis; Matthew Neville; Mitchell R Humphreys
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-05-27

7.  False elevations in urinary metanephrines: under-recognised pitfall with 24-hour urinary volume collection.

Authors:  Terry Shin; Thanh Duc Hoang; Mary Thomas Plunkett; Mohamed K M Shakir
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-04

8.  Detection and correction of incomplete duplicate 24-hour urine collections - theory and practical evidence.

Authors:  Raymond W Wulkan; Martin van der Horst
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

9.  Three-channel ion chromatograph for improved metabolic evaluation of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Guanlin Liu; Yue Cheng; Wenbo Tang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.264

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.