Literature DB >> 25422485

Comparison of breast cancer recurrence and outcome patterns between patients treated from 1986 to 1992 and from 2004 to 2008.

Rachel J D Cossetti1, Scott K Tyldesley1, Caroline H Speers1, Yvonne Zheng1, Karen A Gelmon2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the patterns of relapse according to estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status changed in the contemporary era. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Female patients referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency with biopsy-proven stage I to III breast cancer (BC), diagnosed between 1986 and 1992 (cohort 1 [C1]) and between mid-2004 and 2008 (cohort 2 [C2]), and with known ER and HER2 status were eligible. Data were prospectively collected. C2 patients were matched to C1 patients for stage, grade, and ER and HER2 status. The primary end point was hazard rate of relapse (HRR) for BC by study cohort according to biomarker status. Secondary outcomes included HRR according to stage, grade, and age and hazard rate of death (HRD).
RESULTS: After matching, 7,178 patients were included (3,589 patients in each cohort). BC subtype distribution was as following ER positive/HER2 negative, 70.8%; ER positive/HER2 positive, 6.9%; ER negative/HER2 positive, 6.6%; and ER negative/HER2 negative, 15.8%. For the overall population, the HRR approximately halved in all yearly intervals to year 9 in C2 compared with C1. Differences in HRR between cohorts were greater in the initial five intervals for HER2-positive and ER-negative/HER2-negative BC. The HRR decreased in C2 compared with C1 for all disease stages and grades. The HRD in C2 also decreased compared with C1, although to a lesser extent.
CONCLUSION: Although the pattern of relapse remains similar, there has been a significant improvement in BC relapse-free survival. Outcomes have improved for all BC subtypes, especially HER2-positive and ER-negative/HER2-negative BC, with the early spike in disease recurrence markedly decreased. These contemporary hazard rates are important for treatment decisions, patient discussions, and planning clinical trials of early BC.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25422485     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  57 in total

1.  Utility of Clinical Breast Examinations in Detecting Local-Regional Breast Events After Breast-Conservation in Women with a Personal History of High-Risk Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Heather B Neuman; Jessica R Schumacher; Amanda B Francescatti; Taiwo Adesoye; Stephen B Edge; Elizabeth S Burnside; David J Vanness; Menggang Yu; Yajuan Si; Dan McKellar; David P Winchester; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  The overall survival of breast cancer patients without adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Sakura Onishi; Masataka Sawaki; Junko Ishiguro; Ayumi Kataoka; Madoka Iwase; Kayoko Sugino; Yayoi Adachi; Naomi Gondo; Haruru Kotani; Akiyo Yoshimura; Masaya Hattori; Keitaro Matsuo; Yasushi Yatabe; Hiroji Iwata
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Improving chemotherapy outcome in early breast cancer.

Authors:  Anurag Gupta; Rohit Joshi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-10

4.  Incidence and Survival by Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Status in Young Women With Stage I-III Breast Cancer: SEER, 2010-2016.

Authors:  Alexandra Thomas; Anthony Rhoads; Jonathan Suhl; Kristin M Conway; William G Hundley; Lacey R McNally; Jacob Oleson; Susan A Melin; Charles F Lynch; Paul A Romitti
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Annual Hazard Rates of Recurrence for Breast Cancer During 24 Years of Follow-Up: Results From the International Breast Cancer Study Group Trials I to V.

Authors:  Marco Colleoni; Zhuoxin Sun; Karen N Price; Per Karlsson; John F Forbes; Beat Thürlimann; Lorenzo Gianni; Monica Castiglione; Richard D Gelber; Alan S Coates; Aron Goldhirsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Weight Loss Randomized Intervention Trials in Female Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski; Marina M Reeves
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Patterns of breast cancer relapse in accordance to biological subtype.

Authors:  Atanas Ignatov; Holm Eggemann; Elke Burger; Tanja Ignatov
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Outcomes of Active Surveillance for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: A Computational Risk Analysis.

Authors:  Marc D Ryser; Mathias Worni; Elizabeth L Turner; Jeffrey R Marks; Rick Durrett; E Shelley Hwang
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Regional Nodal Irradiation After Breast Conserving Surgery for Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: Results of a Subanalysis From the ALTTO Trial.

Authors:  Isabelle Gingras; Eileen Holmes; Evandro De Azambuja; David H A Nguyen; Miguel Izquierdo; Jo Anne Zujewski; Moshe Inbar; Bjorn Naume; Gianluca Tomasello; Julie R Gralow; Antonio C Wolff; Lyndsay Harris; Michael Gnant; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; Martine J Piccart; Hatem A Azim
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  A National Study of the Use of Asymptomatic Systemic Imaging for Surveillance Following Breast Cancer Treatment (AFT-01).

Authors:  Jessica R Schumacher; Heather B Neuman; George J Chang; Benjamin D Kozower; Stephen B Edge; Menggang Yu; David J Vanness; Yajuan Si; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Amanda B Francescatti; Patricia A Spears; Jeffrey Havlena; Taiwo Adesoye; Daniel McKellar; David Winchester; Elizabeth S Burnside; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.