Literature DB >> 25421918

Case Study of R-1234yf Refrigerant: Implications for the Framework for Responsible Innovation.

Rafał Wodzisz1.   

Abstract

Safety and care for the natural environment are two of the most important values that drive scientific enterprise in twentieth century. Researchers and innovators often develop new technologies aimed at pollution reduction, and therefore satisfy the strive for fulfilment of these values. This work is often incentivized by policy makers. According to EU directive 2006/40/EC on mobile air conditioning since 2013 all newly approved vehicles have to be filled with refrigerant with low global warming potential (GWP). Extensive and expensive research financed by leading car manufacturers led to invention of R-1234yf refrigerant with GWP < 1, which was huge improvement. For the proper understanding of this case it will be useful to refer it to the idea of responsible innovation (RI), which is now being developed and quickly attracts attention. I proceed in the following order. Firstly, I present the relevant properties of R-1234yf and discuss the controversy associated with its marketing. Secondly, I examine framework for responsible innovation. In greater detail I discuss the notions of care for future generations and collective responsibility. Thirdly, I apply the offered framework to the case study at hand. Finally, I draw some conclusions which go in two directions: one is to make some suggestions for improving the framework of RI, and the second is to identify missed opportunities for developing truly responsible refrigerant.

Keywords:  Framework; Innovation; R-1234yf; RI; Refrigerant; Responsibility; Responsible innovation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25421918     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9612-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  4 in total

1.  Investigating ethical issues in engineering design.

Authors:  I van de Poel
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Environmental science: good governance for geoengineering.

Authors:  Phil Macnaghten; Richard Owen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Flammability assessment of CH2CFCF3: comparison with fluoroalkenes and fluoroalkanes.

Authors:  Kenji Takizawa; Kazuaki Tokuhashi; Shigeo Kondo
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 10.588

4.  The problem of many hands: climate change as an example.

Authors:  Ibo van de Poel; Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist; Neelke Doorn; Sjoerd Zwart; Lambèr Royakkers
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 3.525

  4 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review.

Authors:  Mirjam Schuijff; Anne M Dijkstra
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.