BACKGROUND: Heavy alcohol use is known to increase the risk of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. This is in part due to increased production of reactive oxygen species. We hypothesized that recipients of lungs from heavy drinkers would be more susceptible to lung injury following transplantation. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, donor histories and transplant outcomes were reviewed in 192 consecutive lung transplant recipients. Donors were classified as No Alcohol Use, Moderate Alcohol Use, or Heavy Alcohol Use based on documented donor histories. RESULTS: Freedom from mechanical ventilation took longer in the lung transplant recipients whose donors had Heavy Alcohol Use, compared with those whose donors had No Alcohol Use or Moderate Alcohol Use (p = 0.01). At admission to the intensive care unit, the Heavy Alcohol Use group had median PaO2 /FiO2 ratio 219 (interquartile range [IQR]: 162 to 382), compared with 305 (IQR: 232 to 400) in the Moderate Alcohol Use group and 314 (IQR: 249 to 418) in the No Alcohol Use group (p = 0.005). The odds of developing severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) in the Heavy Alcohol Use group versus the No Alcohol Use group were 8.7 times greater (95% confidence interval 1.427 to 53.404, p = 0.019) after controlling for factors known to be associated with PGD. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients of donors with a heavy alcohol use history had an over 8 times greater risk of developing severe PGD following lung transplant. The increase in PGD resulted in poorer gas exchange in the recipients of donor lungs from heavy alcohol users, and these recipients subsequently required mechanical ventilation for a longer time following transplant. Further investigation into lung donors with heavy alcohol use histories is necessary to determine those at highest risk for PGD following transplant.
BACKGROUND: Heavy alcohol use is known to increase the risk of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. This is in part due to increased production of reactive oxygen species. We hypothesized that recipients of lungs from heavy drinkers would be more susceptible to lung injury following transplantation. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, donor histories and transplant outcomes were reviewed in 192 consecutive lung transplant recipients. Donors were classified as No Alcohol Use, Moderate Alcohol Use, or Heavy Alcohol Use based on documented donor histories. RESULTS: Freedom from mechanical ventilation took longer in the lung transplant recipients whose donors had Heavy Alcohol Use, compared with those whose donors had No Alcohol Use or Moderate Alcohol Use (p = 0.01). At admission to the intensive care unit, the Heavy Alcohol Use group had median PaO2 /FiO2 ratio 219 (interquartile range [IQR]: 162 to 382), compared with 305 (IQR: 232 to 400) in the Moderate Alcohol Use group and 314 (IQR: 249 to 418) in the No Alcohol Use group (p = 0.005). The odds of developing severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) in the Heavy Alcohol Use group versus the No Alcohol Use group were 8.7 times greater (95% confidence interval 1.427 to 53.404, p = 0.019) after controlling for factors known to be associated with PGD. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients of donors with a heavy alcohol use history had an over 8 times greater risk of developing severe PGD following lung transplant. The increase in PGD resulted in poorer gas exchange in the recipients of donor lungs from heavy alcohol users, and these recipients subsequently required mechanical ventilation for a longer time following transplant. Further investigation into lung donors with heavy alcohol use histories is necessary to determine those at highest risk for PGD following transplant.
Authors: Jason D Christie; Martin Carby; Remzi Bag; Paul Corris; Marshall Hertz; David Weill Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2005-06-04 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Shih-jui Lin; James K Koford; Bradley C Baird; John F Hurdle; Sergey Krikov; Arsalan N Habib; Alexander S Goldfarb-Rumyantzev Journal: Transplantation Date: 2005-08-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Jason D Christie; Robert M Kotloff; Vivek N Ahya; Gregory Tino; Alberto Pochettino; Christina Gaughan; Ejigayehu DeMissie; Stephen E Kimmel Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-03-11 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: David J De La Zerda; Oved Cohen; Ramin E Beygui; John Kobashigawa; Diana Hekmat; Hillel Laks Journal: Transplantation Date: 2007-05-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: C I Tsao; R J Chen; N K Chou; W J Ko; N H Chi; H Y Yu; Y S Chen; S C Chen; S S Wang Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Paulius V Kuprys; Hidekazu Tsukamoto; Bin Gao; Lin Jia; Jacob McGowan; Craig M Coopersmith; Maria Camargo Moreno; Holly Hulsebus; Avtar S Meena; Flavia M Souza-Smith; Philip Roper; Michelle T Foster; S Vamsee Raju; S Alex Marshall; Mayumi Fujita; Brenda J Curtis; Todd A Wyatt; Pranoti Mandrekar; Elizabeth J Kovacs; Mashkoor A Choudhry Journal: Alcohol Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 2.405
Authors: Sungwoo Moon; Moo Suk Park; Jin Gu Lee; Ji Ye Jung; Young Ae Kang; Young Sam Kim; Se Kyu Kim; Joon Chang; Hyo Chae Paik; Song Yee Kim Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Ciara M Shaver; Nancy Wickersham; J Brennan McNeil; Hiromasa Nagata; Adam Miller; Stuart R Landstreet; Jamie L Kuck; Joshua M Diamond; David J Lederer; Steven M Kawut; Scott M Palmer; Keith M Wille; Ann Weinacker; Vibha N Lama; Maria M Crespo; Jonathan B Orens; Pali D Shah; Chadi A Hage; Edward Cantu; Mary K Porteous; Gundeep Dhillon; John McDyer; Julie A Bastarache; Jason D Christie; Lorraine B Ware Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2018-01-25
Authors: Aladine A Elsamadicy; Owoicho Adogwa; Victoria D Vuong; Amanda Sergesketter; Gireesh Reddy; Joseph Cheng; Carlos A Bagley; Isaac O Karikari Journal: J Spine Surg Date: 2017-09