| Literature DB >> 25421320 |
Inmaculada Aranaz1, María C Gutiérrez2, María Luisa Ferrer3, Francisco del Monte4.
Abstract
Chitosan is theEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25421320 PMCID: PMC4245548 DOI: 10.3390/md12115619
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1SEM (left) and cryo-etch-SEM (right column) images of cross-sectioned (perpendicular to the direction of freezing) monolithic PVA scaffolds. The freezing rate was 5.9 mm/min and the average molecular weight of the PVA was 72,000 (PVA2) for every ISISA-processed sample. All scale bars are 20 µm. Note that, in some cases, the length of the scale bar changes for better visualization of the scaffold macrostructure. Reprinted with permission from [31]. Copyright ©2007 Wiley-VCH.Verlag.
Figure 2SEM images of cross-sectioned (perpendicular to the direction of freezing) monolithic PVA scaffolds. Tailored morphologies were obtained by using PVA with different weight-average molecular weights (PVA1 = 13,000–23,000, PVA2 = 72,000, PVA3 = 89,000–98,000, and PVA4 = 130,000) and by processing the PVA solution at different freezing rates. All scale bars are 20 µm. Note that, in some cases, the length of the scale bar changes for better visualization of the scaffold macrostructure. The PVA content was 7.8 wt % for every sample. Reprinted with permission from [31]. Copyright ©2007 Wiley-VCH.Verlag.
Figure 3Chemical structure of chitosan where n < 40 and m > 60.
Figure 4SEM micrographs of different hybrid hierarchical structures resulting from freezing hydrogel nanocomposites, with identical CHI and calcium phosphate composition (93.25 and 6.75 wt %, respectively) at different rates: (a) 0.7 mm/min; (b) 2.7 mm/min, and (c) 5.7 mm/min. Scale bars are 50 μm. TEM (d) micrographs of ACP nanoclusters forming the ACP/CHI hierarchical structure. Scale bar is 100 nm. Reprinted with permission from [33]. Copyright ©2008 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5Surgery (A), gross morphology after euthanasia (B,C) and microCT analysis of samples (D). Surgery images (A) show scaffold implantation process. After euthanasia gross morphology images were obtained at different angles (B,C) (Dotted circle indicates defect location).Defect area was still observed in CPS-CHI implanted tibias (B), while in rhBMP2-CPS-CHI implanted tibias high amount of newly-formed hard tissue, apparently bone, appeared vertically from the defect (C). MicroCT study (D) confirmed trabecular bone formation in rhBMP2-CPS-CHI implanted tibias, while it seemed no scaffold-resorption in any case. Neither seemed a robust new bone formation in the rest of implanted scaffolds compared to empty controls. Reprinted with permission from [35]. 2014 PLoS One. Creative Commons License.
Figure 6Kinetics release of CFX/CHI scaffolds having different CFX and CHI contents (left). Representation of the solubility (to CFX molecules, light grey)/hydration (to hydrous crystals, dark grey) ratio of anhydrous crystals (light grey) depending on their crystal size (right). Reproduced from [36] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 7(Top panel) Picture of AuNP-CHI gels having different HAuCl4·3H2O concentrations (from left to right; nil, 0.2, 0.5, 1, and 2 mM) obtained after thermal treatment at 40 °C over 150 min. Effect of the viscosities and strength hydrogel on scaffold morphology. (Bottom panel) Examples of sols and gels produced by controlling Au concentration lamellar structure from sols (left) and cellular-type morphology (right). Scale bars are 200 µm. Reprinted with permission from [38]. Copyright ©2011 American Chemical Society.
Figure 8SEM micrographs of MWCNT/CHI scaffolds: (a) cross-section view; (b) longitudinal view according to plane 1 and (c) longitudinal view according to plane 2. Scale bars are 200 µm in every case. Reprinted with permission from [41]. Copyright ©2012 Wiley-VCH.Verlag.
Figure 9Confocal fluorescence microscope images showing a MWCNT scaffold soaked for 24 h in a suspension of bacteria in culture medium. The depth of focus was (a) the external surface and (b) 2; (c) 4; (d) 8; (e) 12; (f) 16; (g) 24 and (h) 32 µm. Scale bar is 20 µm. Inset: MWCNT scaffold, where the arrow indicates the view angle used for confocal fluorescent micrographs. Reproduced from [26] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 10(a) Three representative bacteria-glucose-alginate beads with diameters around 1 mm; (b) A longitudinal section of a monolithic MWCNT scaffold with immobilized bacteria-glucose-alginate beads, where the homogenous allocation of the beads can be visualized; (c) SEM image of a longitudinal section of the MWCNT scaffold with a hole left by a bead (bar is 500 µm); (d) MWCNT monoliths with immobilized bacteria-glucose-alginate beads right after soaking in culture medium (left) and after incubation at 37 °C for 24 hours (right); (e,f) Confocal fluorescence microscope images of the MWCNT monolith with immobilized bacteria-glucose-alginate beads soaked in culture medium before (e) and after (f) incubation at 37 °C for 24 h (bars are 20 µm). Inset: MWCNT scaffold, arrow indicates the view angle used for confocal fluorescent microscopy. In both cases, the focus was at the MWCNT structure and not at the alginate bead. Bacteria visible in (e) most likely corresponded to some minor fraction of bacteria released from alginate. Reproduced from [24] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 11SEM images (a–c) of biofilm at different magnifications taken from the inner part of the 3D scaffold. CLSM images at different magnifications (d and e), after staining with live/dead (bacLight) kit, of the longitudinal section of Gs biofilm induced to grow in a 3D scaffold, pre-filled with Gs, at 0 V versus Ag/AgCl, operated under flow of culture medium (10 mM acetate) for ~320 h. Reprinted with permission from [45]. The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Scaffold characterization including porosity, surface roughness, mechanical properties, and electrical conductivity. Adapted from [66] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.
| Scaffold | Pore Area per µm2 (AP) | Pore Width (WP) (µm) | RMS Roughness (Rq) (nm) | Young’s Modulus (MPa) | Conductivity (S/cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNCHI a | 0.60 ± 0.14 | 1.4 ± 2.8 | 220 | 5.2 | 1.70 |
| LNCHI-65 b | 0.69 ± 0.05 | 60 ± 40 | 190 | 1.2 | 0.70 |
| SNCHI c | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 21 ± 4 | 120 | 4.0 | 0.32 |
a LN: MWCNT length 5–9 µm; b LNCHI-65: Freezed at −65 °C; c SN: MWCNT length 3 µm.
Figure 12SEM images of LNCHI (A) and SNCHI (B) scaffolds along with their 3D reconstructed images (C and D, respectively). Scale bars: 10 mm (A) and 20 mm (B). Red lines in Figure 12 A and B indicate position of measurement. Adapted from [66] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 13L929 fibroblast cell viability on LNCHI (A and B), LNCHI-65 (C and D). Dead cells appear stained in red, while living cells are stained in bright green. Representative culture images at 48 h are shown. Scale bars: 75 mm (top) and 25 mm (bottom). Reprinted from [66] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 14Picture A shows a surgical implantation of MWCNT/CHI scaffolds containing adsorbed rhBMP2 into a mouse subcutaneous muscular pocket. Optical micrograph B shows regenerated bone tissue and the small fraction of MWCNT/CHI scaffold remaining three weeks after scaffold implantation. Optical micrographs C–F show details of the three main distinguishable zones observed in micrograph B: Zone 1 where the MWCNT/CHI scaffold structure remained basically intact (marked by green circles), Zone 2 where non-differentiated fibroblasts (purple cells) were colonizing the partially disassembled structure of the MWCNT/CHI scaffold (the positions of representative clusters of MWCNT/CHI aggregates are indicated by blue arrows), and Zone 3 where the MWCNT/CHI scaffold was fully disassembled and individual MWCNT/CHI (the locations of some representative MWCNT/CHI are indicated by blue circles) were dispersed within the regenerated bone tissue (collagen expressing cells are colored blue-green). Note the abundance of blood vessels (containing erythrocytes, of which some representative examples are indicated by yellow arrows) in Zone 2. Optical micrograph F shows a few individual MWCNT/CHI (also located within blue circles) dispersed within muscle tissue (colored pink) surrounding the implant. Reprinted with permission from [57]. Copyright ©2007 Elsevier.
Figure 15Top panel: Schematic representation of the cryogenic process followed for the preparation of MWCNT scaffolds and of the subsequent processes followed for GA architecture reinforcement and HA mineralization (HA crystals are represented as grease open circles). Middle row: SEM micrographs of MWCNT/CHI scaffolds (left) and Hap mineralized MWCNT/CHI scaffolds (right). Bars are 20 mm. Bottom panel: SEM (left) and TEM (right) micrographs show a detail of Hap crystals on the MWCNT forming the scaffold. Scale bars are 10 and 1 µm, respectively Reproduced from [59] with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 16SEM micrographs of MWCNT scaffolds mineralized in flow-through conditions revealed the long-range homogeneity of the mineral coating along the entire scaffold structure of the monolith. Electrodeposition was carried out over 30 min at 30 °C and 1.4 V. Top panel: Longitudinal view, scale bars represent 400 μm (top) and 20 μm (bottom).Bottom panel: Cross-Section view, scale bars represent 200 μm (a); 50 μm (b); 20 μm (c); and 5 μm (d). Reprinted with permission from [41]. Copyright ©2012 WILEY-VCH Verlag.
Figure 17SEM micrographs of MWCNT/CHI scaffolds after mineralization in flow-through conditions that revealed the homogeneity of the mineral coating irrespective of the experimental conditions used for electrodeposition; (a) 30 °C-30 min-2.1 V; (b) 30 °C-180 min-1.4 V; (c) 60 °C-30 min-1.8 V; and (d) 60 °C-30 min-2.1 V. Scale bars are 20 µm in every case. Reprinted with permission from [41]. Copyright ©2012 WILEY-VCH. Verlag.