Literature DB >> 25421183

Incidence and risk factors analysis of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement.

Min Qi1, Huajiang Chen1, Peng Cao1, Ye Tian1, Wen Yuan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) as a substitute for traditional fusion surgery has been widely used in treating degenerative cervical disc diseases. The objectives of this study were to assess the clinical and radiological findings for patients with heterotopic ossification (HO) following CDR and to detect the risk factors of HO after CDR.
METHODS: A total of 125 patients with symptomatic cervical single- or double-level disc diseases, who underwent CDR procedure with Discover prosthesis in Department of Spine Surgery, Changzheng Orthopedics Hospital from March 2009 to March 2011, were enrolled in this retrospective study. Occurrence of HO was defined by the McAfee classification on cervical lateral X-rays in this study. Prosthesis vertebral ratio (PVR) was used to determine the matching degree between the cervical disc prosthesis and cervical vertebra. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors of HO. Variables evaluated for their association with HO occurrence included age, gender, high-intensity signal in spinal cord, preoperative range of motion (ROM), postoperative ROM, operation level number, and PVR.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was (26.4±5.8) months. All the patients had significant symptoms and neurological function improvements during the follow-up period. The ROM of the operated segment from the preoperative period to the last follow-up was relatively well maintained. The rate of HO in this cohort of patients, who underwent Discover disc, was 27.92% per surgical level and 24.8% per patient by the last follow-up. There were 19 patients (19.79%) with HO in the single-level group while 12 patients (41.38%) in the double-level group.
CONCLUSIONS: We identified preoperative high-intensity signal in spinal cord, postoperative ROM of surgical level, number of operation level, and PVR as significant risk factors for postoperative HO occurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25421183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  5 in total

1.  Discover cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in symptomatic cervical disc diseases: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Shangguan; Guang-Zhi Ning; Yu Tang; Zhe Wang; Zhuo-Jing Luo; Yue Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Heterotopic Ossification After Prestige-LP Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Is Related to Insufficient Sagittal Coverage of the Endplate By the Prosthesis.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Yunsheng Ou; Xing Du; Bin He; Yuanqiang Li; Haoyang Yu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-03-22

3.  The Changes in Cervical Biomechanics After CTDR and Its Association With Heterotopic Ossification: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Hui; Kevin Phan; Mei-Yi Lee; Jack Kerferd; Telvinderjit Singh; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-06-03

4.  Impact of T1 slope on surgical and adjacent segment degeneration after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jia Li; Yong Shen; Peng Yang; Yongqian Li
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 5.  The prevalence of heterotopic ossification among patients after cervical artificial disc replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingde Kong; Qinghua Ma; Fei Meng; Junming Cao; Kunlun Yu; Yong Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.