Literature DB >> 25420835

Immunosuppression based on everolimus in liver transplant recipients with severe early post-transplantation neurotoxicity.

I Bilbao1, C Dopazo2, L Castells2, J Lazaro2, M Caralt2, G Sapisochin2, R Charco2.   

Abstract

The immunosuppressive management of liver transplant recipients suffering early calcineurin inhibitor-induced neurotoxicity is a challenge in daily clinical practice. We have assessed the use of everolimus as the main immunosuppressant in patients presenting severe neurotoxicity in the early post-transplantation period. From October 1988 to October 2012, 10 patients in our center received everolimus because of severe neurotoxicity in the 1st 3 months after transplantation. We analyzed several variables associated with this treatment, including patient characteristics, time from liver transplantation to conversion to everolimus, immunosuppression regimens before and after conversion, treatment efficacy, adverse events, and discontinuation after conversion. Median follow-up after conversion to everolimus was 27 months (range, 1-63 mo). Neurotoxic events were: akinetic mutism in 4 patients, repeated convulsions in 3, cerebrovascular accident in 1, Guillain-Barré syndrome in 1, and disabling tremor in 1. Treatment with calcineurin inhibitors was discontinued in all patients. Post-conversion regimens consisted of everolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus steroids in 7 patients, everolimus plus MMF in 1, everolimus plus steroids in 1, and everolimus alone in 1. Liver function was maintained for ≥1 month in all patients except 1, who presented a severe rejection that was treated with steroid bolus and Neoral cyclosporine. Neurologic function was fully recovered in 8 patients. In 1 patient with akinetic mutism and another with convulsions, tacrolimus was reintroduced at 2 months and 1 month, respectively, after resolution of the neurotoxic event. Everolimus is feasible and effective as the main immunosuppressant in patients suffering severe neurotoxicity during the 1st 3 months after transplantation. It allows neurologic function to be recovered while maintaining adequate liver function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25420835     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  4 in total

1.  Late onset of progressive speech impairment due to tacrolimus-associated leukoencephalopathy after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Kazushige Sato; Yuichi Miura; Yuhji Marui; Kiho Tanaka; Shinji Tomikawa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-06-14       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Cross-sectional analysis of immunosuppressive regimens focused on everolimus after liver transplantation in a Korean high-volume transplantation center.

Authors:  Sang-Hyun Kang; Shin Hwang; Tae-Yong Ha; Gi-Won Song; Dong-Hwan Jung; Chul-Soo Ahn; Deok-Bog Moon; Ki-Hun Kim; Gil-Chun Park; Young-In Yoon; Yo-Han Park; Hui-Dong Cho; Jae-Hyun Kwon; Yong-Kyu Chung; Jin Uk Choi; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Korean J Transplant       Date:  2019-12-31

Review 3.  Use of everolimus in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Mei-Ling Yee; Hui-Hui Tan
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2017-08-18

4.  A cross-sectional analysis of long-term immunosuppressive regimens after liver transplantation at Asan Medical Center: Increased preference for mycophenolate mofetil.

Authors:  Shin Hwang; Chul-Soo Ahn; Ki-Hun Kim; Deok-Bog Moon; Tae-Yong Ha; Gi-Won Song; Dong-Hwan Jung; Gil-Chun Park; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2018-02-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.