Literature DB >> 25420787

Optimal catchment area and primary PCI centre volume revisited: a single-centre experience in transition from high-volume centre to "mega centre" for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Mikkel Malby Schoos1, Frants Pedersen, Lene Holmvang, Thomas Engstrøm, Kari Saunamaki, Steffen Helqvist, Jens Kastrup, Roxana Mehran, George Dangas, Erik Jørgensen, Henning Kelbæk, Peter Clemmensen.   

Abstract

AIMS: The currently stated optimal catchment population for a pPCI centre is 300,000-1,100,000, resulting in 200-800 procedures/year. pPCI centres are increasing in number even within small geographic areas. We describe the organisation and quality of care after merging two high-volume centres, creating one mega centre serving 2.5 million inhabitants, and performing ~1,000 procedures/year. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In this descriptive cohort study, we linked individual-level data from the national Central Population Register holding survival status with our in-hospital dedicated PCI database of baseline, organisational and procedural characteristics. Quality measures were treatment delays and 30-day all-cause mortality. In the three-year study period, 2,066 consecutive pPCIs were performed. After the fusion of the two centres, pPCI procedures increased by 102%, while door-to-balloon remained stable at 32 minutes. Up to 75.1% of patients were directly transferred by pre-hospital triage, of whom 82.7% had ECG-to-balloon <120 min, 92.6% had door-to-balloon <60 min. Thirty-day all-cause mortality remained low at 6.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study challenges the stated maximal pPCI centre volume. The quality of a centre reflects governance, training, resources and pre-hospital triage, rather than catchment population and STEMI incidence, as long as a minimum volume is guaranteed. Resources can be utilised better by merging neighbouring centres, without negative effects on quality of care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25420787     DOI: 10.4244/EIJY14M11_07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  1 in total

1.  Helicopter vs. ground transportation of patients bound for primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  K S Funder; L S Rasmussen; V Siersma; N Lohse; R Hesselfeldt; F Pedersen; O M Hendriksen; J Steinmetz
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.105

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.