Literature DB >> 25420273

Prediction of Hemodynamic Response to Epinephrine via Model-Based System Identification.

Ramin Bighamian, Sadaf Soleymani, Andrew T Reisner, Istvan Seri, Jin-Oh Hahn.   

Abstract

In this study, we present a system identification approach to the mathematical modeling of hemodynamic responses to vasopressor-inotrope agents. We developed a hybrid model called the latency-dose-response-cardiovascular (LDC) model that incorporated 1) a low-order lumped latency model to reproduce the delay associated with the transport of vasopressor-inotrope agent and the onset of physiological effect, 2) phenomenological dose-response models to dictate the steady-state inotropic, chronotropic, and vasoactive responses as a function of vasopressor-inotrope dose, and 3) a physiological cardiovascular model to translate the agent's actions into the ultimate response of blood pressure. We assessed the validity of the LDC model to fit vasopressor-inotrope dose-response data using data collected from five piglet subjects during variable epinephrine infusion rates. The results suggested that the LDC model was viable in modeling the subjects' dynamic responses: After tuning the model to each subject, the r (2) values for measured versus model-predicted mean arterial pressure were consistently higher than 0.73. The results also suggested that intersubject variability in the dose-response models, rather than the latency models, had significantly more impact on the model's predictive capability: Fixing the latency model to population-averaged parameter values resulted in r(2) values higher than 0.57 between measured versus model-predicted mean arterial pressure, while fixing the dose-response model to population-averaged parameter values yielded nonphysiological predictions of mean arterial pressure. We conclude that the dose-response relationship must be individualized, whereas a population-averaged latency-model may be acceptable with minimal loss of model fidelity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25420273     DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2014.2371533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  2 in total

Review 1.  Regulatory Considerations for Physiological Closed-Loop Controlled Medical Devices Used for Automated Critical Care: Food and Drug Administration Workshop Discussion Topics.

Authors:  Bahram Parvinian; Christopher Scully; Hanniebey Wiyor; Allison Kumar; Sandy Weininger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Machine Learning Prediction Models for Mechanically Ventilated Patients: Analyses of the MIMIC-III Database.

Authors:  Yibing Zhu; Jin Zhang; Guowei Wang; Renqi Yao; Chao Ren; Ge Chen; Xin Jin; Junyang Guo; Shi Liu; Hua Zheng; Yan Chen; Qianqian Guo; Lin Li; Bin Du; Xiuming Xi; Wei Li; Huibin Huang; Yang Li; Qian Yu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.