BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a web-based stress management program among community college students that focused on increasing perceived control over stressful events. DESIGN:Students (N = 257) were randomly assigned to a Present Control Intervention or a Stress-information only comparison group. METHODS: Primary outcomes were perceived stress and stress symptoms; secondary outcomes were depression and anxiety. Self-report measures were completed online at preintervention, postintervention, and three-week follow-up. Intervention effects were estimated using linear mixed models. Seventy-five percent of the sample (n = 194) completed the pretest and comprised the intent-to-treat sample. RESULTS: Participants in the intervention group reported significant increases in present control, and significant decreases in all four primary and secondary outcome measures from baseline to postintervention and follow-up. Within-group effect sizes were small to medium at postintervention (mean d = -.34) and follow-up (mean d = -.49). The mean between-group effect size on the four outcome measures was d = .35 at postintervention but d = .12 at follow-up, due to unexpected decreases in distress in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Our online program is a cost-effective mental health program for college students. Limitations and future direction are discussed.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the effectiveness of a web-based stress management program among community college students that focused on increasing perceived control over stressful events. DESIGN: Students (N = 257) were randomly assigned to a Present Control Intervention or a Stress-information only comparison group. METHODS: Primary outcomes were perceived stress and stress symptoms; secondary outcomes were depression and anxiety. Self-report measures were completed online at preintervention, postintervention, and three-week follow-up. Intervention effects were estimated using linear mixed models. Seventy-five percent of the sample (n = 194) completed the pretest and comprised the intent-to-treat sample. RESULTS:Participants in the intervention group reported significant increases in present control, and significant decreases in all four primary and secondary outcome measures from baseline to postintervention and follow-up. Within-group effect sizes were small to medium at postintervention (mean d = -.34) and follow-up (mean d = -.49). The mean between-group effect size on the four outcome measures was d = .35 at postintervention but d = .12 at follow-up, due to unexpected decreases in distress in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Our online program is a cost-effective mental health program for college students. Limitations and future direction are discussed.
Entities:
Keywords:
college students; community college; emotional distress; online intervention; perceived control; stress management
Authors: Elena Heber; David Daniel Ebert; Dirk Lehr; Pim Cuijpers; Matthias Berking; Stephanie Nobis; Heleen Riper Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Mathias Harrer; Sophia Helen Adam; Rebecca Jessica Fleischmann; Harald Baumeister; Randy Auerbach; Ronny Bruffaerts; Pim Cuijpers; Ronald C Kessler; Matthias Berking; Dirk Lehr; David Daniel Ebert Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Mathias Harrer; Jennifer Apolinário-Hagen; Lara Fritsche; Marie Drüge; Ludwig Krings; Korinna Beck; Christel Salewski; Anna-Carlotta Zarski; Dirk Lehr; Harald Baumeister; David Daniel Ebert Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2019-05-21 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Emily G Lattie; Elizabeth C Adkins; Nathan Winquist; Colleen Stiles-Shields; Q Eileen Wafford; Andrea K Graham Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Dana Schultchen; Ann-Marie Küchler; Christine Schillings; Felicitas Weineck; Alexander Karabatsiakis; David D Ebert; Harald Baumeister; Olga Pollatos Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 2.692