Literature DB >> 25419716

Density and group size influence shoal cohesion, but not coordination in zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Delia S Shelton1, Brittany C Price2, Karen M Ocasio2, Emília P Martins3.   

Abstract

The formations made by gregarious animals can range from loose aggregates to highly synchronized and ordered structures. For very large, coordinated groups, both physical and social environments are important for determining the physical arrangement of individuals in the group. Here we tested whether physical and social factors are also important in determining the structure of small, loosely coordinated groups of zebrafish. We found that even though our fish were not crowded and did not use most of the available space, the distance between individual fish was explained primarily by the amount of available space (i.e., density). Zebrafish in a larger space spread out more and the total dimensions of the shoal were an additive function also of group size. We, however, did not find any impact of social or physical environment on the orientation of individual fish or shoal. Thus, both physical and social factors were important for shoal spatial arrangements, but not individual orientation and shoal alignment. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25419716     DOI: 10.1037/a0038382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  10 in total

1.  Flexible group cohesion and coordination, but robust leader-follower roles, in a wild social primate using urban space.

Authors:  Anna M Bracken; Charlotte Christensen; M Justin O'Riain; Ines Fürtbauer; Andrew J King
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Small increases in group size improve small shoals' response to water flow in zebrafish.

Authors:  Piyumika S Suriyampola; Alec A Iruri-Tucker; Lyan Padilla-Veléz; Alejandra Enriquez; Delia S Shelton; Emília P Martins
Journal:  J Zool (1987)       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 2.394

3.  Collective Behavior in Wild Zebrafish.

Authors:  Delia S Shelton; Sierra G Shelton; Danita K Daniel; Manickam Raja; Anuradha Bhat; Robyn L Tanguay; Dennis M Higgs; Emília P Martins
Journal:  Zebrafish       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Acute Citalopram administration modulates anxiety in response to the context associated with a robotic stimulus in zebrafish.

Authors:  Mert Karakaya; Andrea Scaramuzzi; Simone Macrì; Maurizio Porfiri
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.201

5.  The shoaling behavior of two cyprinid species in conspecific and heterospecific groups.

Authors:  Zhong-Hua Tang; Hui Wu; Qing Huang; Lu Kuang; Shi-Jian Fu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Loose social organisation of AB strain zebrafish groups in a two-patch environment.

Authors:  Axel Séguret; Bertrand Collignon; Léo Cazenille; Yohann Chemtob; José Halloy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The zebrafish subcortical social brain as a model for studying social behavior disorders.

Authors:  Yijie Geng; Randall T Peterson
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 8.  Zebrafish Modeling of Autism Spectrum Disorders, Current Status and Future Prospective.

Authors:  Akram Tayanloo-Beik; Shayesteh Kokabi Hamidpour; Mina Abedi; Hamide Shojaei; Mostafa Rezaei Tavirani; Nazli Namazi; Bagher Larijani; Babak Arjmand
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.435

9.  Is Heightened-Shoaling a Good Candidate for Positive Emotional Behavior in Zebrafish?

Authors:  Becca Franks; Courtney Graham; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Recent experience impacts social behavior in a novel context by adult zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  Delawrence J Sykes; Piyumika S Suriyampola; Emília P Martins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.