Literature DB >> 25419390

Outcome analysis of laporoscopic D1 and D2 dissection in patients 70 years and older with gastric cancer.

Seyfi Emir1, Selim Sözen1, Ilhan Bali1, Sibel Özkan Gürdal1, Bünyamin Cüneyt Turan2, Oguzhan Yıldırım3, Tarkan Yetişyiğit4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Gastric cancer is a worldwide aggressive tumor with a bad prognosis. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate operative findings of 53 patients aged over 70 with gastric cancer who underwent laporoscopic operations in our clinic.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent laporoscopic surgery for pathologically confirmed gastric cancer at our clinic between March 2008 and October 2010 was conducted. D1 resection (Level1 lymphadenectomy) was compared with D2 resection (Levels 1 and 2 lymphadenectomy). The two groups in which D1 and D2 Lymph node Dissection (LND) were applied were compared with respect to number of patients, sex, age, stage of disease, and score of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). We analyzed surgical methods, the use of staplers, operative time, additional organ resections, hospital stay, postoperative complications and the need for re-operation, operative mortality, and the effects of prognostic factors on survival.
RESULTS: The patient group consisted of 31 (58%) males and 22 (42%) females. Of the patients, 28 (52%) underwent D1 and 25 (48%) D2 LND. There was a significant difference between the two groups with regard to length of surgery (p < 0.01). The length of operation, blood loss, and transfusion requirement in the D2 group were significantly more than those in the D1 group. There was no mortality in cases that underwent additional organ resection. The survival times of cases with a ≤ 0.25 ratio of dissected number of lymph nodes to metastatic lymph nodes were significantly longer than those of other cases. The survival time of cases with perineural and vascular invasion was significantly shorter. The survival rates of Stage I patients was significantly higher than those of Stage III (p:0.002) and Stage IV (p:0.003) patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Although extensive dissection had an increased morbidity, there was no significant statistical difference between the two procedures. Early complications should not be attributed only to the extent of LND. The important prognostic factors related to long-time survival are the stage of the tumor, perineural and perivascular invasion, and metastatic lymph nodes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic surgery; gastric cancer; older patients

Year:  2014        PMID: 25419390      PMCID: PMC4238469     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  54 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  W H Allum; S M Griffin; A Watson; D Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Risk factors related to operative morbidity in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  A Gil-Rendo; J L Hernández-Lizoain; F Martínez-Regueira; A Sierra Martínez; F Rotellar Sastre; M Cervera Delgado; V Valentí Azcarate; C Pastor Idoate; J Alvarez-Cienfuegos
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Risk factors for operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer patients undergoing total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Dao-Jun Gong; Chao-Feng Miao; Qi Bao; Ming Jiang; Li-Fang Zhang; Xiao-Tao Tong; Li Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Adjuvant radiation therapy increases overall survival in node-positive gastric cancer patients with aggressive surgical resection and lymph node dissection: a SEER database analysis.

Authors:  Ravi Shridhar; George W Dombi; Jill Weber; Sarah E Hoffe; Kenneth Meredith; Andre Konski
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 5.  The immunologic consequences of laparoscopy in oncology.

Authors:  J J Carter; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.495

6.  Clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors in 10 783 patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jin-Pok Kim; Joo-Ho Lee; Soo-Jin Kim; Hang-Jong Yu; Han-Kwang Yang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Family history and the risk of stomach and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C La Vecchia; E Negri; S Franceschi; A Gentile
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Pulmonary function, pain, and fatigue after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Schulze; J Thorup
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1993 Jun-Jul

9.  Preservation of the spleen improves survival after radical surgery for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J P Griffith; H M Sue-Ling; I Martin; M F Dixon; M J McMahon; A T Axon; D Johnston
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 10.  Prognostic factors for gastric cancer influencing clinical practice.

Authors:  J D Harrison; J W Fielding
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

View more
  2 in total

1.  Short and long-term outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma in elderly patients.

Authors:  Bo Shu; Sanlin Lei; Fazhao Li; Songwen Hua; Yong Chen; Zhi Huo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

2.  Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Fengxiang Qi; Yong Jiang; Haoyu Zhai; Yinglan Ji
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.