Literature DB >> 25419382

The effects of incisor inclination changes on the position of point A in Class II division 2 malocclusion using three-dimensional evaluation: a long-term prospective study.

Qiushuo Chen1, Caixia Zhang1, Yu Zhou1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate change in the sagittal position of point A due to orthodontic treatment by orthodontic community-cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 40 subjects (22 males and 18 females) who had Class II division 2 malocclusion were recruited, and 40 subjects (23 males and 17 females) who had minor crowding in the beginning of the treatment and required no or minimal maxillary anterior tooth movement were served as control. The changes in maxillary incisor inclination, sagittal position of point A, SNA angle, and movement of incisor root apex and incisal edge were calculated before and after CBCT treatment.
RESULTS: Maxillary incisors were significantly proclined in the study group but not in the control group. This proclination resulted in 2.95 mm backward movement of the root apex and 6.23 mm forward movement of the incisal edge of maxillary incisors. Point A moved 1.24 mm and 0.18 mm backward in the study and control groups, respectively. Incisor root apex and incisal edge almost remained stable in the control group. No significant change was observed in the SNA angle in both the study and control groups. However, the change in SNA between the two groups was found to be significant.
CONCLUSIONS: Proclination of maxillary incisors with backward movement of incisor root apex caused posterior movement of point A. This posterior movement significantly affects the SNA angle.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Class II division 2; maxillary incisor proclination; point A

Year:  2014        PMID: 25419382      PMCID: PMC4238535     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  24 in total

1.  The clinical significance of error measurement in the interpretation of treatment results.

Authors:  A Kamoen; L Dermaut; R Verbeeck
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes with cervical headgear and mandibular protraction appliance therapy in the treatment of Class II malocclusions.

Authors:  Danilo Furquim Siqueira; Renato Rodrigues de Almeira; Guilherme Janson; Analu Giampietro Brandão; Carlos Martins Coelho Filho
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution.

Authors:  Alexander Dudic; Catherine Giannopoulou; Michael Leuzinger; Stavros Kiliaridis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  The detection and management of root resorption lesions using intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography - an in vivo investigation.

Authors:  S Patel; A Dawood; R Wilson; K Horner; F Mannocci
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.264

5.  Maxillary incisor proclination effect on the position of point A in Class II division 2 malocclusion.

Authors:  Kazem S Al-Nimri; Abdalla M Hazza'a; Rami M Al-Omari
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Nonextraction treatment of severe Class II, division 2 malocclusions. Part 2.

Authors:  M G Arvystas
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  A study of roentgenocephalometric bony landmarks.

Authors:  F P van der Linden
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1971-02

8.  Clinical investigations related to use of the Begg technique at the University of Tennessee.

Authors:  F N Weber
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1971-01

Review 9.  A comparative assessment of cephalometric errors.

Authors:  J M Battagel
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.

Authors:  Vandana Kumar; John Ludlow; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  2 in total

1.  Skelate changes induced by orthodontic in class II division 1 by CBCT: a long-term follow-up prospective study.

Authors:  Shuofei Zhang; Weiting Chen; Sheng Ding; Hongwei Han; Zhou Yu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

2.  Is It Possible to Protract the Maxilla by Surgically Assisted Rapid Maxillary Expansion and Intermaxillary Class III Elastics?

Authors:  Emir Bahman Şahbaz; Emre Cesur; Ayşe Tuba Altuğ; Kutay Can Ergül; Hakan Alpay Karasu; Ufuk Toygar Memikoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2019-06-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.