Literature DB >> 25418603

Virtual anthropology.

Gerhard W Weber1.   

Abstract

Comparative morphology, dealing with the diversity of form and shape, and functional morphology, the study of the relationship between the structure and the function of an organism's parts, are both important subdisciplines in biological research. Virtual anthropology (VA) contributes to comparative morphology by taking advantage of technological innovations, and it also offers new opportunities for functional analyses. It exploits digital technologies and pools experts from different domains such as anthropology, primatology, medicine, paleontology, mathematics, statistics, computer science, and engineering. VA as a technical term was coined in the late 1990s from the perspective of anthropologists with the intent of being mostly applied to biological questions concerning recent and fossil hominoids. More generally, however, there are advanced methods to study shape and size or to manipulate data digitally suitable for application to all kinds of primates, mammals, other vertebrates, and invertebrates or to issues regarding plants, tools, or other objects. In this sense, we could also call the field "virtual morphology." The approach yields permanently available virtual copies of specimens and data that comprehensively quantify geometry, including previously neglected anatomical regions. It applies advanced statistical methods, supports the reconstruction of specimens based on reproducible manipulations, and promotes the acquisition of larger samples by data sharing via electronic archives. Finally, it can help identify new, hidden traits, which is particularly important in paleoanthropology, where the scarcity of material demands extracting information from fragmentary remains. This contribution presents a current view of the six main work steps of VA: digitize, expose, compare, reconstruct, materialize, and share. The VA machinery has also been successfully used in biomechanical studies which simulate the stress and strains appearing in structures. Although methodological issues remain to be solved before results from the two domains can be fully integrated, the various overlaps and cross-fertilizations suggest the widespread appearance of a "virtual functional morphology" in the near future.
© 2014 American Association of Physical Anthropologists.

Keywords:  biomechanics; comparative morphology; functional morphology; geometric morphometrics; human evolution; shape and form analysis; virtual anthropology; virtual morphology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25418603     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  10 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating osteological ageing from digital data.

Authors:  Chiara Villa; Jo Buckberry; Niels Lynnerup
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Computational Intelligence for Medical Imaging Simulations.

Authors:  Victor Chang
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  The Parametric Model of the Human Mandible Coronoid Process Created by Method of Anatomical Features.

Authors:  Nikola Vitković; Jelena Mitić; Miodrag Manić; Miroslav Trajanović; Karim Husain; Slađana Petrović; Stojanka Arsić
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.238

4.  The Evolutionary Radiation of Hominids: a Phylogenetic Comparative Study.

Authors:  Guido Rocatti; S Ivan Perez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Using virtual reality for anatomical landmark annotation in geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Dolores Messer; Michael Atchapero; Mark B Jensen; Michelle S Svendsen; Anders Galatius; Morten T Olsen; Jeppe R Frisvad; Vedrana A Dahl; Knut Conradsen; Anders B Dahl; Andreas Bærentzen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Three-dimensional geometric morphometric sex determination of the whole and modeled fragmentary human pubic bone.

Authors:  Katherine Baca; Brandon Bridge; Meradeth Snow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparability of skeletal fibulae surfaces generated by different source scanning (dual-energy CT scan vs. high resolution laser scanning) and 3D geometric morphometric validation.

Authors:  Annalisa Pietrobelli; Rita Sorrentino; Veronica Notariale; Stefano Durante; Stefano Benazzi; Damiano Marchi; Maria Giovanna Belcastro
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.921

Review 8.  Paleomimetics: A Conceptual Framework for a Biomimetic Design Inspired by Fossils and Evolutionary Processes.

Authors:  Valentina Perricone; Tobias Grun; Pasquale Raia; Carla Langella
Journal:  Biomimetics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 9.  Virtual anthropology - a brief review of the literature and history of computed tomography.

Authors:  Tanya Uldin
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2017-09-14

10.  CT-scan vs. 3D surface scanning of a skull: first considerations regarding reproducibility issues.

Authors:  Stella Fahrni; Lorenzo Campana; Alejandro Dominguez; Tanya Uldin; Fabrice Dedouit; Olivier Delémont; Silke Grabherr
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2017-06-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.