Literature DB >> 25418062

Deriving field-based species sensitivity distributions (f-SSDs) from stacked species distribution models (S-SDMs).

Aafke M Schipper1, Leo Posthuma, Dick de Zwart, Mark A J Huijbregts.   

Abstract

Quantitative relationships between species richness and single environmental factors, also called species sensitivity distributions (SSDs), are helpful to understand and predict biodiversity patterns, identify environmental management options and set environmental quality standards. However, species richness is typically dependent on a variety of environmental factors, implying that it is not straightforward to quantify SSDs from field monitoring data. Here, we present a novel and flexible approach to solve this, based on the method of stacked species distribution modeling. First, a species distribution model (SDM) is established for each species, describing its probability of occurrence in relation to multiple environmental factors. Next, the predictions of the SDMs are stacked along the gradient of each environmental factor with the remaining environmental factors at fixed levels. By varying those fixed levels, our approach can be used to investigate how field-based SSDs for a given environmental factor change in relation to changing confounding influences, including for example optimal, typical, or extreme environmental conditions. This provides an asset in the evaluation of potential management measures to reach good ecological status.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25418062     DOI: 10.1021/es503223k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Studies on ecological risk assessment of pesticide using species sensitivity distribution.

Authors:  Takashi Nagai
Journal:  J Pestic Sci       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 1.519

2.  Identification of risk areas for Orobanche cumana and Phelipanche aegyptiaca in China, based on the major host plant and CMIP6 climate scenarios.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Xiaolei Cao; Zhaoqun Yao; Xue Dong; Meixiu Chen; Lifeng Xiao; Sifeng Zhao
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Ecosystem quality in LCIA: status quo, harmonization, and suggestions for the way forward.

Authors:  John S Woods; Mattia Damiani; Peter Fantke; Andrew D Henderson; John M Johnston; Jane Bare; Serenella Sala; Danielle Maia de Souza; Stephan Pfister; Leo Posthuma; Ralph K Rosenbaum; Francesca Verones
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.141

4.  Identification and ranking of environmental threats with ecosystem vulnerability distributions.

Authors:  Michiel C Zijp; Mark A J Huijbregts; Aafke M Schipper; Christian Mulder; Leo Posthuma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Additivity and Interactions in Ecotoxicity of Pollutant Mixtures: Some Patterns, Conclusions, and Open Questions.

Authors:  Ismael Rodea-Palomares; Miguel González-Pleiter; Keila Martín-Betancor; Roberto Rosal; Francisca Fernández-Piñas
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2015-09-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.