OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors are prevalent among Black adults. Studies have demonstrated that functional social support buffers CVD risk. The objective of our study is to assess whether specific types of functional social support or their cumulative total buffers CVD risk factors among a convenience sample of Black adults, and whether these associations differ by sex or partner status. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using self-reported survey data. SETTING: Large church in Houston, TX. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,381 Black adults reported their perceived social support using appraisal, belonging, and tangible subscales of the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12. A cumulative score was created based on the three subscales. Participants also reported on a number of sociodemographic characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three self-reported CVD risk factors: diabetes, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol (yes vs no). RESULTS: A series of multivariate logistic regressions controlling for sociodemographic characteristics were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CVD risk factors. Cumulative social support, rather than any specific type of social support, was significantly related to diabetes and high blood pressure. Higher cumulative social support was associated with lower odds of experiencing diabetes (aOR = .97, 95% CI = .94, .99) and high blood pressure (aOR = .98, 95% CI = .95, .99). Neither sex nor partner status moderated associations. CONCLUSION: In a high risk population for CVD, increasing all types of social support--appraisal, belonging, and tangible--might be useful in preventing or delaying the onset of CVD.
OBJECTIVE:Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors are prevalent among Black adults. Studies have demonstrated that functional social support buffers CVD risk. The objective of our study is to assess whether specific types of functional social support or their cumulative total buffers CVD risk factors among a convenience sample of Black adults, and whether these associations differ by sex or partner status. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using self-reported survey data. SETTING: Large church in Houston, TX. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,381 Black adults reported their perceived social support using appraisal, belonging, and tangible subscales of the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12. A cumulative score was created based on the three subscales. Participants also reported on a number of sociodemographic characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three self-reported CVD risk factors: diabetes, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol (yes vs no). RESULTS: A series of multivariate logistic regressions controlling for sociodemographic characteristics were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CVD risk factors. Cumulative social support, rather than any specific type of social support, was significantly related to diabetes and high blood pressure. Higher cumulative social support was associated with lower odds of experiencing diabetes (aOR = .97, 95% CI = .94, .99) and high blood pressure (aOR = .98, 95% CI = .95, .99). Neither sex nor partner status moderated associations. CONCLUSION: In a high risk population for CVD, increasing all types of social support--appraisal, belonging, and tangible--might be useful in preventing or delaying the onset of CVD.
Authors: S Woloshin; L M Schwartz; A N Tosteson; C H Chang; B Wright; J Plohman; E S Fisher Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Matthew M Burg; John Barefoot; Lisa Berkman; Diane J Catellier; Susan Czajkowski; Patrice Saab; Marc Huber; Vicki DeLillo; Pamela Mitchell; Judy Skala; C Barr Taylor Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2005 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Rebecca A Shelby; Tim R Crespin; Sharla M Wells-Di Gregorio; Ruth M Lamdan; Jamie E Siegel; Kathryn L Taylor Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2008-08-20
Authors: Lorraine R Reitzel; Hiroe Okamoto; Daphne C Hernandez; Seann D Regan; Lorna H McNeill; Ezemenari M Obasi Journal: Am J Health Behav Date: 2016-01
Authors: DeAnnah R Byrd; Yanping Jiang; Samuele Zilioli; Roland J Thorpe; Peter A Lichtenberg; Keith E Whitfield Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2022-02-03 Impact factor: 6.591
Authors: Uzoji Nwanaji-Enwerem; Elijah O Onsomu; Dionne Roberts; Abanish Singh; Beverly H Brummett; Redford B Williams; Jennifer R Dungan Journal: SAGE Open Nurs Date: 2022-06-23
Authors: Ana Karen Manriquez Prado; Gabriel Fidel Santos Malavé; Lauren E Friedman; Juan Carlos Vélez; Rodrigo Winston Gillibrand Esquinazi; Sixto E Sanchez; Qiu-Yue Zhong; Bizu Gelaye; Michelle A Williams Journal: Int J Womens Health Date: 2018-07-19
Authors: Lorna H McNeill; Lorraine R Reitzel; Kamisha H Escoto; Crystal L Roberson; Nga Nguyen; Jennifer I Vidrine; Larkin L Strong; David W Wetter Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2018-07-19
Authors: Daphne C Hernandez; Sajeevika S Daundasekara; Michael J Zvolensky; Lorraine R Reitzel; Diane Santa Maria; Adam C Alexander; Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-07-23 Impact factor: 3.390