Literature DB >> 25416636

Survival analysis of dental implants and implant-retained prostheses in oral cancer patients up to 20 years.

Christian Doll1, Claudia Nack, Jan-Dirk Raguse, Andres Stricker, Fabian Duttenhoefer, Katja Nelson, Susanne Nahles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival rate and potential influencing factors of dental implants and implant-retained prostheses in oral cancer patients who had undergone surgical tumor resection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present study, 157 patients (95 females and 62 males with a mean age of 53.7 years) with 830 implants were included. All patients were diagnosed with a malignant tumor in the oral cavity and had undergone ablative surgery. In 55 patients (292 implants), the surgical procedure was followed by an additional radiochemotherapy (RCT) before implant placement. Nicotine users who received RCT were excluded from this study. Patients were clinically examined every 6 or 12 months according to a standard procedure.
RESULTS: Of the 830 examined implants, 450 were placed in the maxilla and 380 in the mandible. A total of 65 implants were lost, 36 in the maxilla and 29 in the mandible; of these, 42 implants (65%) were documented as lost due to the patient's death. The mean observation period was 121 months. The cumulative survival rate was 94.9% at 3 years and 92.5% at 7 years. With an observation period up to 20 years, the cumulative survival rate remained constant after 11 years with 90.8%. Age, gender, and localization (maxilla/mandible) of implants did not show any influence on the survival of the implants. However, radiochemotherapy was determined as a significant factor influencing the survival rate.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that the survival rate of implants was significantly lower in oral cancer patients who had been treated by ablative surgery and additional radiochemotherapy than in patients without RCT. Since there is no significant difference in the mortality rate of patients with additional RCT compared to patients who underwent sole ablative surgery, the higher loss ratio is due to a late failure of osseointegration. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dental implants in oral cancer patients who had been treated by ablative surgery show a high and steady cumulative survival rate after 11 years. Implant survival of patients with additional RCT is significantly lower. Non-smoking-irradiated patients seem to have a better implant survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25416636     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1359-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  18 in total

1.  Long-term results of endosteal implants used for restoration of oral function after oncologic surgery.

Authors:  H Schliephake; F W Neukam; R Schmelzeisen; M Wichmann
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 2.  Implant survival rate after oral cancer therapy: a review.

Authors:  Fawad Javed; Khalid Al-Hezaimi; Abdulaziz Al-Rasheed; Khalid Almas; George E Romanos
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.337

3.  Rehabilitation of irradiated patients with modified and conventional sandblasted acid-etched implants: preliminary results of a split-mouth study.

Authors:  Susanne Heberer; Sevtap Kilic; Jaber Hossamo; Jan-Dirk Raguse; Katja Nelson
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 5.977

4.  Long-term results of endosteal implants following radical oral cancer surgery with and without adjuvant radiation therapy.

Authors:  Sabine S Linsen; Markus Martini; Helmut Stark
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.932

5.  Effects of chemotherapy on osseointegration of implants: a case report.

Authors:  A R McDonald; M A Pogrel; A Sharma
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 6.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; G Zarb; P Worthington; A R Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Osseointegration in irradiated cancer patients: an analysis with respect to implant failures.

Authors:  Gösta Granström
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 8.  Dental rehabilitation after surgery for oral cancer.

Authors:  Adrian Pace-Balzan; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  Characteristics of early versus late implant failure: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yifat Manor; Saheer Oubaid; Ofer Mardinger; Gavriel Chaushu; Joseph Nissan
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Survival analysis and clinical evaluation of implant-retained prostheses in oral cancer resection patients over a mean follow-up period of 10 years.

Authors:  Katja Nelson; Susanne Heberer; Corvin Glatzer
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical performance of different types of dental prosthesis in patients with head and neck tumors-a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Karina Zierden; Juliane Wöstmann; Bernd Wöstmann; Peter Rehmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  The Management of Patients after Surgical Treatment of Maxillofacial Tumors.

Authors:  D Rolski; J Kostrzewa-Janicka; P Zawadzki; K Życińska; E Mierzwińska-Nastalska
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.411

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.