Literature DB >> 25416502

Aerosol characteristics at a rural station in southern peninsular India during CAIPEEX-IGOC: physical and chemical properties.

D S Bisht1, A K Srivastava, A S Pipal, M K Srivastava, A K Pandey, S Tiwari, G Pandithurai.   

Abstract

To understand the boundary layer characteristics and pathways of aerosol-cloud interaction, an Integrated Ground Observational Campaign, concurrent with Cloud Aerosol Interaction and Precipitation Enhancement Experiment, was conducted by the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune, under Ministry of Earth Sciences at Mahabubnagar (a rural environment, which is ~100 km away from an urban city Hyderabad in Andhra Pradesh), during the period of July-November 2011. Collected samples of PM2.5 and PM10 were analyzed for water-soluble ionic species along with organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC). During study period, the average mass concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were about 50(±10) and 69(±14) μg m(-3), respectively, which are significantly higher than the prescribed Indian National Ambient Air Quality Standards values. The chemical species such as sum of anions and cations from measured chemical constituents were contributed to be 31.27 and 38.49% in PM2.5 and 6.35 and 5.65% to the PM10, whereas carbonaceous species contributed ~17.3 and 20.47% for OC and ~3.0 and 3.10% for EC, respectively. The average ratio of PM2.5/PM10 during study period was ~0.73(±0.2), indicating that the dominance of fine size particles. Carbonaceous analysis results showed that the average concentration of OC was 14 and 8.7 μg m(-3), while EC was 2.1 and 1.5 μg m(-3) for PM10 and PM2.5, respectively. The ratios between OC and EC were estimated, which were 6.6 and 5.7 for PM10 and PM2.5, suggesting the presence of secondary organic aerosol. Total carbonaceous aerosol accounts 23% of PM10 in which the contribution of OC is 20% and EC is 3%, while 20% of PM2.5 mass in which the contribution of OC is 17% and EC is 3%. Out of the total aerosols mass, water-soluble constituents contributed an average of 45% in PM10 and 38% in PM2.5 including about 39% anions and 6% cations in PM10, while 31% anions and 7% cations in PM2.5 aerosol mass collectively at study site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25416502     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3836-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  11 in total

1.  Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 3. C1-C29 organic compounds from fireplace combustion of wood.

Authors:  J J Schauer; M J Kleeman; G R Cass; B R Simoneit
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Indian aerosols: present status.

Authors:  A P Mitra; C Sharma
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.086

3.  Residential biofuels in South Asia: carbonaceous aerosol emissions and climate impacts.

Authors:  C Venkataraman; G Habib; A Eiguren-Fernandez; A H Miguel; S K Friedlander
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Sources and characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols at Agra "World heritage site" and Delhi "capital city of India".

Authors:  A S Pipal; S Tiwari; P G Satsangi; Ajay Taneja; D S Bisht; A K Srivastava; M K Srivastava
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Particulate air pollution as a predictor of mortality in a prospective study of U.S. adults.

Authors:  C A Pope; M J Thun; M M Namboodiri; D W Dockery; J S Evans; F E Speizer; C W Heath
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Electrocardiographic conduction disturbances in association with low-level lead exposure (the Normative Aging Study).

Authors:  Y Cheng; J Schwartz; P S Vokonas; S T Weiss; A Aro; H Hu
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  ACE-Asia intercomparison of a thermal-optical method for the determination of particle-phase organic and elemental carbon.

Authors:  J J Schauer; B T Mader; J T Deminter; G Heidemann; M S Bae; J H Seinfeld; R C Flagan; R A Cary; D Smith; B J Huebert; T Bertram; S Howell; J T Kline; P Quinn; T Bates; B Turpin; H J Lim; J Z Yu; H Yang; M D Keywood
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Characteristics of organic matter in PM2.5 in Shanghai.

Authors:  Jialiang Feng; Chak K Chan; Ming Fang; Min Hu; Lingyan He; Xiaoyan Tang
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 9.  Chapter one: exposure measurements.

Authors:  Judith C Chow; Johann P Engelbrecht; Natalie C G Freeman; Jamal Hisham Hashim; Matti Jantunen; Jon-Pierre Michaud; Sandra Saenz de Tejada; John G Watson; Fusheng Wei; William E Wilson; Mayayuki Yasuno; Tan Zhu
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 7.086

10.  Source profiles of particulate organic matters emitted from cereal straw burnings.

Authors:  Yuan-xun Zhang; Min Shao; Yuan-hang Zhang; Li-min Zeng; Ling-yan He; Bin Zhu; Yong-jie Wei; Xian-lei Zhu
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.565

View more
  3 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of PM2.5 and PM10 at urban and corresponding background sites in 23 cities in China.

Authors:  Lizhong Xu; Stuart Batterman; Fang Chen; Jiabing Li; Xuefen Zhong; Yongjie Feng; Qinghua Rao; Feng Chen
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Traffic tracers in a suburban location in northern Spain: relationship between carbonaceous fraction and metals.

Authors:  L Megido; L Negral; L Castrillón; E Marañón; Y Fernández-Nava; B Suárez-Peña
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Use of spatiotemporal characteristics of ambient PM2.5 in rural South India to infer local versus regional contributions.

Authors:  M Kishore Kumar; V Sreekanth; Maëlle Salmon; Cathryn Tonne; Julian D Marshall
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 8.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.