Literature DB >> 25416501

Animal models for exploring the pharmacokinetics of breast cancer therapies.

Omar M Rashid1, Kazuaki Takabe.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite massive expenditures in research and development to cure breast cancer, few agents that pass preclinical trials demonstrate efficacy in humans. Although this endeavor relies on murine models to screen for efficacy before progressing to clinical trials, historically there has been little focus on the validation of these models, even in the era of targeted therapy where understanding the genetic signatures of tumors under study is critical. AREAS COVERED: This review includes the transgenic, xenograft, and syngeneic murine breast cancer models, the ectopic, orthotopic and intravenous methods of cell implantation, and the ethics of animal experimentation. It also includes the latest data on tumor gene expression and the issues to consider when exploring the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of breast cancer therapies. EXPERT OPINION: Breast cancer drug development is expensive and inefficient without a consensus preclinical murine model. Investigators must approach the choice of murine model with the same sophistication that is applied to the choice of in vitro assays to improve efficiency. Understanding the limitations of each model available, including the nuances of tumor gene signatures, is critical for investigators exploring the phamacokinetics and efficacy of breast cancer therapies, especially in the context of gene profiling and individualized targeted therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer drug development; murine metastatic model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25416501      PMCID: PMC4583421          DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2015.983073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol        ISSN: 1742-5255            Impact factor:   4.481


  79 in total

Review 1.  Orthotopic is orthodox: why are orthotopic-transplant metastatic models different from all other models?

Authors:  R M Hoffman
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.429

2.  In situ transduction of cytosine deaminase gene followed by systemic use of 5-fluorocytosine inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in orthotopic prostate cancer mouse models.

Authors:  Zhengwang Zhang; Lianhua Yin; Yongkang Zhang; Fengdi Zhao
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Tumor subpopulation interactions in metastasis.

Authors:  F R Miller
Journal:  Invasion Metastasis       Date:  1983

4.  Growth and metastatic behavior of human tumor cells implanted into nude and beige nude mice.

Authors:  S Naito; R Giavazzi; S M Walker; K Itoh; J Mayo; I J Fidler
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1987 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 5.  Trials, tribulations, and trends in tumor modeling in mice.

Authors:  JoAnn C L Schuh
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Nude mouse metastatic models of human stomach cancer constructed using orthotopic implantation of histologically intact tissue.

Authors:  T Furukawa; X Fu; T Kubota; M Watanabe; M Kitajima; R M Hoffman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Animal models of bone metastasis.

Authors:  Thomas J Rosol; Sarah H Tannehill-Gregg; Bruce E LeRoy; Stefanie Mandl; Christopher H Contag
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 8.  From genetic abnormality to metastases: murine models of breast cancer and their use in the development of anticancer therapies.

Authors:  P D Ottewell; R E Coleman; I Holen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors.

Authors:  Jason I Herschkowitz; Karl Simin; Victor J Weigman; Igor Mikaelian; Jerry Usary; Zhiyuan Hu; Karen E Rasmussen; Laundette P Jones; Shahin Assefnia; Subhashini Chandrasekharan; Michael G Backlund; Yuzhi Yin; Andrey I Khramtsov; Roy Bastein; John Quackenbush; Robert I Glazer; Powel H Brown; Jeffrey E Green; Levy Kopelovich; Priscilla A Furth; Juan P Palazzo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Philip S Bernard; Gary A Churchill; Terry Van Dyke; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  A model of spontaneous mouse mammary tumor for human estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Lixiang Zheng; Bugao Zhou; Xianming Meng; Weifeng Zhu; Airen Zuo; Xiaomin Wang; Runde Jiang; Shiping Yu
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.650

View more
  21 in total

1.  Orthotopic Implantation Achieves Better Engraftment and Faster Growth Than Subcutaneous Implantation in Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts.

Authors:  Maiko Okano; Masanori Oshi; Ali Butash; Ichiro Okano; Katsuharu Saito; Tsutomu Kawaguchi; Masayuki Nagahashi; Koji Kono; Toru Ohtake; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Multiscale systems pharmacological analysis of everolimus action in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Anusha Ande; Maher Chaar; Sihem Ait-Oudhia
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.745

3.  Orthotopic Breast Cancer Model to Investigate the Therapeutic Efficacy of Nanobody-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy.

Authors:  Marion M Deken; Shadhvi S Bhairosingh; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Sabrina Oliveira
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

Review 4.  Challenges and opportunities in metastatic breast cancer treatments: Nano-drug combinations delivered preferentially to metastatic cells may enhance therapeutic response.

Authors:  Jesse Yu; Qingxin Mu; Millie Fung; Xiaolin Xu; Linxi Zhu; Rodney J Y Ho
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 13.400

Review 5.  Tackling tumor heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity in cancer precision medicine: our experience and a literature review.

Authors:  Shijie Sheng; M Margarida Bernardo; Sijana H Dzinic; Kang Chen; Elisabeth I Heath; Wael A Sakr
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  Modified breast cancer model for preclinical immunotherapy studies.

Authors:  Eriko Katsuta; Stephanie C DeMasi; Krista P Terracina; Sarah Spiegel; Giao Q Phan; Harry D Bear; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 2.192

7.  S1P promotes breast cancer progression by angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis.

Authors:  Partha Mukhopadhyay; Rajesh Ramanathan; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Manag       Date:  2015-10

8.  Murine breast cancer mastectomy model that predicts patient outcomes for drug development.

Authors:  Eriko Katsuta; Omar M Rashid; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Doxorubicin effect is enhanced by sphingosine-1-phosphate signaling antagonist in breast cancer.

Authors:  Eriko Katsuta; Li Yan; Masayuki Nagahashi; Ali Raza; Jamie L Sturgill; Debra E Lyon; Omar M Rashid; Nitai C Hait; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Preliminary preclinical study of Chol-DsiRNA polyplexes formed with PLL[30]-PEG[5K] for the RNAi-based therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  Zhen Ye; Mai Mohamed Abdelmoaty; Vishakha V Ambardekar; Stephen M Curran; Shetty Ravi Dyavar; Lora L Arnold; Samuel M Cohen; Devendra Kumar; Yazen Alnouti; Don W Coulter; Rakesh K Singh; Joseph A Vetro
Journal:  Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 5.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.