S Wirth1, M Baur2, J Spaeth2, J Guttmann2, S Schumann2. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, Freiburg D-79106, Germany steffen.wirth@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, Freiburg D-79106, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lung-protective mechanical ventilation during general surgery including the application of PEEP can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. In a prospective clinical observation study, we evaluated volume-dependent respiratory system compliance in adult patients undergoing ear-nose-throat surgery with ventilation settings chosen empirically by the attending anaesthetist. METHODS: In 40 patients, we measured the respiratory variables during intraoperative mechanical ventilation. All measurements were subdivided into 5 min intervals. Dynamic compliance (CRS) and the intratidal volume-dependent CRS curve was calculated for each interval and classified into one of the six specific compliance profiles indicating intratidal recruitment/derecruitment, overdistension or all. We retrospectively compared the occurrences of the respective compliance profiles at PEEP levels of 5 cm H2O and at higher levels. RESULTS: The attending anaesthetists set the PEEP level initially to 5 cm H2O in 29 patients (83%), to 7 cm H2O in 5 patients (14%), and to 8 cm H2O in 2 patients (6%). Across all measurements the mean CRS was 61 (11) ml cm H2O(-1) (40-86 ml cm H2O(-1)) and decreased continuously during the procedure. At PEEP of 5 cm H2O the compliance profile indicating strong intratidal recruitment/derecruitment occurred more often (18.6%) compared with higher PEEP levels (5.5%, P<0.01). Overdistension was practically never observed. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients, a PEEP of 5 cm H2O during intraoperative mechanical ventilation is too low to prevent intratidal recruitment/derecruitment. The analysis of the intratidal compliance profile provides the rationale to individually titrate a PEEP level that stabilizes the alveolar recruitment status of the lung during intraoperative mechanical ventilation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00004286.
BACKGROUND: Lung-protective mechanical ventilation during general surgery including the application of PEEP can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. In a prospective clinical observation study, we evaluated volume-dependent respiratory system compliance in adult patients undergoing ear-nose-throat surgery with ventilation settings chosen empirically by the attending anaesthetist. METHODS: In 40 patients, we measured the respiratory variables during intraoperative mechanical ventilation. All measurements were subdivided into 5 min intervals. Dynamic compliance (CRS) and the intratidal volume-dependent CRS curve was calculated for each interval and classified into one of the six specific compliance profiles indicating intratidal recruitment/derecruitment, overdistension or all. We retrospectively compared the occurrences of the respective compliance profiles at PEEP levels of 5 cm H2O and at higher levels. RESULTS: The attending anaesthetists set the PEEP level initially to 5 cm H2O in 29 patients (83%), to 7 cm H2O in 5 patients (14%), and to 8 cm H2O in 2 patients (6%). Across all measurements the mean CRS was 61 (11) ml cm H2O(-1) (40-86 ml cm H2O(-1)) and decreased continuously during the procedure. At PEEP of 5 cm H2O the compliance profile indicating strong intratidal recruitment/derecruitment occurred more often (18.6%) compared with higher PEEP levels (5.5%, P<0.01). Overdistension was practically never observed. CONCLUSIONS: In most patients, a PEEP of 5 cm H2O during intraoperative mechanical ventilation is too low to prevent intratidal recruitment/derecruitment. The analysis of the intratidal compliance profile provides the rationale to individually titrate a PEEP level that stabilizes the alveolar recruitment status of the lung during intraoperative mechanical ventilation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00004286.
Authors: Jonas Weber; Jan Gutjahr; Johannes Schmidt; Sara Lozano-Zahonero; Silke Borgmann; Stefan Schumann; Steffen Wirth Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Serge J H Heines; Sebastiaan A M de Jongh; Ulrich Strauch; Iwan C C van der Horst; Marcel C G van de Poll; Dennis C J J Bergmans Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2022-08-15 Impact factor: 2.376