| Literature DB >> 25416028 |
A Baraldi1, S A Jones, S Guesné, M J Traynor, W J McAuley, M B Brown, S Murdan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Through the characterisation of the human onchomycotic nail plate this study aimed to inform the design of new topical ungual formulations.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25416028 PMCID: PMC4381097 DOI: 10.1007/s11095-014-1562-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Res ISSN: 0724-8741 Impact factor: 4.200
Comparison of Nail Physical Properties
| Characteristic | Healthy nail | Diseased nail |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Pore size (μm2) | 0.78 ± 0.29 | 1.52 ± 0.59 | 1.92 ± 1.24 |
| Nail thickness (mm) | 0.49 ± 0.15 | 1.20 ± 0.67 | 0.31 ± 0.08 |
| Nail density (g/cm3) | 1.34 ± 0.01 | 1.29 ± 0.00 | 1.26 ± 0.00 |
data represents mean ± one standard deviation (n = 3)
Fig. 1SEM micrographs of a healthy (left) and diseased nail (right), dorsal layer (top); ventral layer (bottom).
Fig. 2Stress/strain profiles of healthy (black trace) vs in vivo infected diseased nails (red trace), inset: comparison of ultimate tensile strength of the nails.
Fig. 3Raman spectra of nail dorsal surfaces when presented as healthy nails, TCEP-treated nails and diseased nails.
Fig. 4Water content (Mt) normalised to water content at equilibrium (Me) against time (t) normalised to the time at equilibrium (Te) of heathy versus diseased nails (Mean ± sd, n = 3; 2 cycles per n).
Fig. 5Transport of Rhodamine through the human nail plate using two different application vehicles, an aqueous phosphate buffer (PBS) at pH 7.4 and an aqueous phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 mixed with ethanol (EtOH).