Literature DB >> 25415785

Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy with foraminoplasty for the treatment of spondylolisthesis.

Gabriele P Jasper, Gina M Francisco, Albert E Telfeian1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis is a common entity and occurs mainly in elderly patients. The trend in surgery has been to offer decompression with instrumented fusion based on patient-based outcome data and the inherent instability of the condition.
OBJECTIVES: Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy and foraminotomy is an ultra-minimally invasive outpatient surgical option available to patients that does not require general anesthesia and does not involve the same amount of destabilizing facet joint removal as a traditional laminectomy and medial facetectomy. The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of tranforaminal endoscopic discectomy and foraminotomy in patients with lumbar 4-5 (L4-L5) and lumbar 5-sacral 1 (L5-S1) spondylolisthesis and lumbar radiculopathy.
METHODS: After Institutional Review Board Approval, charts from 21 consecutive patients with L4-L5 or L5-S1 spondylolisthesis and complaints of lower back and radicular pain who underwent endoscopic procedures between 2007 and 2012 were reviewed.
RESULTS: The average pain relief one year postoperatively was reported to be 71.9%, good results as defined by MacNab. The average pre-operative VAS score was 8.48, indicated in our questionnaire as severe and constant pain. The average one year postoperative VAS score was 2.30, indicated in our questionnaire as mild and intermittent pain. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study and only offers one year follow-up data for patients with spondylolisthesis undergoing endoscopic spine surgery for treatment of lumbar radiculopathy.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic discectomy is a safe and effective alternative to open back surgery. The one year follow-up data presented here appears to indicate that an ultra-minimally invasive approach to the treatment of lumbar radiculopathy in the setting of spondylolisthesis that has a low complication rate, avoids general anesthesia, and is outpatient might be worth studying in a prospective, longer term way. IRB approval: Meridian Health: IRB Study # 201206071J.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25415785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Physician        ISSN: 1533-3159            Impact factor:   4.965


  10 in total

1.  Efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis in elderly patients.

Authors:  Xin-Feng Li; Lin-Yu Jin; Zhen-Dong Lv; Xin-Jin Su; Kun Wang; Hong-Xing Shen; Xiao-Xing Song
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Difficulties, Challenges, and the Learning Curve of Avoiding Complications in Lumbar Endoscopic Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Albert E Telfeian; Stefan Hellinger; Max R F Ramos; Hyeun Sung Kim; Daniel W Hanson; Nimar Salari; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

Review 3.  Lumbar Endoscopic Microdiscectomy: Where Are We Now? An Updated Literature Review Focused on Clinical Outcome, Complications, and Rate of Recurrence.

Authors:  Giulio Anichini; Alessandro Landi; Federico Caporlingua; André Beer-Furlan; Christian Brogna; Roberto Delfini; Emiliano Passacantilli
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar spinal canal decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Bingtao Wen; Xifeng Zhang; Lin Zhang; Peng Huang; Guoquan Zheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 5.  Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy using Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine System technique: Pitfalls that a beginner should avoid.

Authors:  Stylianos Kapetanakis; Grigorios Gkasdaris; Antonios G Angoules; Panagiotis Givissis
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-12-18

6.  Comparison of Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy with and without Foraminoplasty for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A 2-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Binbin Wu; Gonghao Zhan; Xinyi Tian; Linyu Fan; Chenchen Jiang; Beekoo Deepti; Hong Cao; Jun Li; Qingquan Lian; Xixi Huang; Feng Xu
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.037

7.  Clinical Outcomes of Interlaminar Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Pornpavit Sriphirom; Chaiyaporn Siramanakul; Preewut Chaipanha; Chalit Saepoo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-01-10

8.  Surgeon training and clinical implementation of spinal endoscopy in routine practice: results of a global survey.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; José-Antonio Soriano-Sánchez; Xifeng Zhang; Jorge Felipe Ramírez León; Sergio Soriano Solis; José Gabriel Rugeles Ortíz; Gabriel Oswaldo Alonso Cuéllar; Marlon Sudário de Lima E Silva; Stefan Hellinger; Álvaro Dowling; Nicholas Prada; Gun Choi; Girish Datar; Anthony Yeung
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

9.  Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Discectomy via Eccentric Trepan foraminoplasty Technology for Unilateral Stenosed Serve Root Canals.

Authors:  Hong-Jun Zou; Yong Hu; Jin-Bo Liu; Jun Wu
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.071

10.  The biomechanical effects of foraminoplasty of different areas under lumbar percutaneous endoscopy on intervertebral discs: A 3D finite element analysis.

Authors:  YiZhou Xie; Qun Zhou; Xinling Wang; Qiang Jian; Xiaohong Fan; Yang Yu; Dangwei Gu; WeiDong Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.