Literature DB >> 25415241

Factors affecting penetrating captive bolt gun performance.

Troy J Gibson1, Charles W Mason, Jade Y Spence, Heather Barker, Neville G Gregory.   

Abstract

Captive bolt stunning is used for rendering livestock insensible at slaughter. The mechanical factors relating to performance of 6 penetrating captive bolt gun (CBG) models were examined. The Matador Super Sécurit 3000 and the .25 Cash Euro Stunner had the highest kinetic energy values (443 J and 412 J, respectively) of the CBGs tested. Ninety percent (27/30) of CBGs held at a government gun repository (United Kingdom) were found to have performed at a normal standard for the model, while 53% (10/19) of commercial contractor CBGs tested were found to underperform for the gun model. When the .22 Cash Special was fired 500 times at 4 shots per min, the gun reached a peak temperature of 88.8°C after 2.05 hr. Repeat firing during extended periods significantly reduced the performance of the CBG. When deciding on the appropriate CBG/cartridge combination, the kinetic energy delivered to the head of the nonhuman animal, bolt penetration depth, and species/animal type must be considered. It is recommended that CBGs are routinely checked for wear to the bolt and barrel if they are repeatedly fired in a session.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; captive bolt; kinetic energy; slaughter; velocity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25415241     DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2014.980579

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Anim Welf Sci        ISSN: 1088-8705            Impact factor:   1.440


  8 in total

Review 1.  Achieving humane outcomes in killing livestock by free bullet I: Penetrating brain injury.

Authors:  Terry L Whiting; Dennis Will
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Evaluation of physical euthanasia for neonatal piglets on-farm.

Authors:  Filipe Antonio Dalla Costa; Troy J Gibson; Steffan Edward Octávio Oliveira; Neville George Gregory; Arlei Coldebella; Luigi Faucitano; Charli Beatriz Ludtke; Liziè Peréirã Buss; Osmar Antonio Dalla Costa
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  History and best practices of captive bolt euthanasia for swine.

Authors:  Karly N Anderson; John Deen; Jerry Karczewski; Perle E Zhitnitskiy; Kurt D Vogel
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-05-23

4.  An Examination of the Performance of Blank Cartridges Used in Captive Bolt Devices for the Pre-Slaughter Stunning and Euthanasia of Animals.

Authors:  Andrew Grist; Jeff A Lines; Randall Bock; Toby G Knowles; Stephen B Wotton
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Macroscopic Examination of Multiple-Shot Cattle Heads-An Animal Welfare Due Diligence Tool for Abattoirs Using Penetrating Captive Bolt Devices?

Authors:  Andrew Grist; Toby G Knowles; Stephen Wotton
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Pain at the Slaughterhouse in Ruminants with a Focus on the Neurobiology of Sensitisation.

Authors:  Daniel Mota-Rojas; Fabio Napolitano; Ana Strappini; Agustín Orihuela; Marcelo Daniel Ghezzi; Ismael Hernández-Ávalos; Patricia Mora-Medina; Alexandra L Whittaker
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  The Use of a Mechanical Non-Penetrating Captive Bolt Device for the Euthanasia of Neonate Lambs.

Authors:  Andrew Grist; Jeff A Lines; Toby G Knowles; Charles W Mason; Stephen B Wotton
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Pathophysiology of Concussive Non-Penetrative Captive Bolt Stunning of Turkeys.

Authors:  Troy J Gibson; Emma King; Jade Spence; Georgina Limon
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.