Literature DB >> 25415161

Pregnancy outcomes in the super obese, stratified by weight gain above and below institute of medicine guidelines.

Morgan L Swank1, Nicole E Marshall, Aaron B Caughey, Elliott K Main, William M Gilbert, Kathryn A Melsop, Judith H Chung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of antenatal weight gain above and below the 2009 Institute of Medicine (IOM) guidelines in the super-obese population (body mass index [BMI] of 50 or higher) on the maternal and neonatal morbidities of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia (pregnancy-induced hypertension), gestational diabetes mellitus, cesarean delivery, birth weight more than 4,000 g and more than 4,500 g, low birth weight, and preterm birth.
METHODS: The effect of gestational weight gain was assessed in this retrospective cohort study using California birth certificate and patient discharge diagnosis data. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) as a function of antenatal weight gain. Weight gain within 2009 IOM guidelines (11-20 pounds) served as the reference group.
RESULTS: The study population consisted of 1,034 women. Women gaining below, within, and above IOM guidelines accounted for 38.3, 23.5, and 38.2%, respectively. Weight gain below IOM guidelines was not associated with a statistically increased odds of preterm birth (OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.60-5.59) or low birth weight (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.57-2.49); however, birth weight more than 4,000 g was significantly reduced (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.77). Excessive weight gain statistically increased the odds of pregnancy-induced hypertension (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.26-3.03) and cesarean delivery (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.00-1.97) while not appearing to protect against the delivery of low-birth-weight neonates (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.40-1.78).
CONCLUSION: Weight gain below the current guidelines in the super-obese cohort is not associated with an increase in maternal or neonatal risk while decreasing the odds of delivering a macrosomic neonate. Women with BMIs of 50 or higher may warrant separate gestational weight gain recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25415161     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  10 in total

1.  Optimal Gestational Weight Gain for Women with Gestational Diabetes and Morbid Obesity.

Authors:  Beatriz Barquiel; Lucrecia Herranz; Diego Meneses; Óscar Moreno; Natalia Hillman; Mª Ángeles Burgos; José Luis Bartha
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-09

2.  Maternal and neonatal outcomes in obese women who lose weight during pregnancy.

Authors:  C M Cox Bauer; K A Bernhard; D M Greer; D C Merrill
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Association of Gestational Weight Gain With Maternal and Infant Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca F Goldstein; Sally K Abell; Sanjeeva Ranasinha; Marie Misso; Jacqueline A Boyle; Mary Helen Black; Nan Li; Gang Hu; Francesco Corrado; Line Rode; Young Ju Kim; Margaretha Haugen; Won O Song; Min Hyoung Kim; Annick Bogaerts; Roland Devlieger; Judith H Chung; Helena J Teede
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Periodontal status of women with excessive gestational weight gain and the association with their newborns' health.

Authors:  Bruno Gualtieri Jesuino; Gerson Aparecido Foratori-Junior; Alana Luiza Trenhago Missio; Leonardo Silva Mascoli; Silvia Helena de Carvalho Sales-Peres
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.607

5.  Obesity May Be Protective against Severe Perineal Lacerations.

Authors:  Diana Garretto; Brian B Lin; Helen L Syn; Nancy Judge; Karen Beckerman; Fouad Atallah; Arnold Friedman; Michael Brodman; Peter S Bernstein
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2016-05-05

6.  Birthweight and pregnancy outcomes in obese class II women with low weight gain: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Estelle Roussel; Salma Touleimat; Laurence Ollivier; Eric Verspyck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of Maternal Pre-Pregnancy BMI and Gestational Weight Gain on the Development of Preeclampsia and Its Phenotypes: A Prospective Cohort Study in China.

Authors:  Senmao Zhang; Xing Qiu; Jiabi Qin; Xingli Song; Yiping Liu; Jianhui Wei; Mengting Sun; Jing Shu; Tingting Wang; Lizhang Chen; Yurong Jiang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Pre-pregnancy BMI, gestational weight gain and risk of preeclampsia: a birth cohort study in Lanzhou, China.

Authors:  Yawen Shao; Jie Qiu; Huang Huang; Baohong Mao; Wei Dai; Xiaochun He; Hongmei Cui; Xiaojuan Lin; Ling Lv; Dennis Wang; Zhongfeng Tang; Sijuan Xu; Nan Zhao; Min Zhou; Xiaoying Xu; Weitao Qiu; Qing Liu; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Relationship between pre-pregnancy maternal BMI and optimal weight gain in singleton pregnancies.

Authors:  Pierre-Yves Robillard; Gustaaf Dekker; Malik Boukerrou; Nathalie Le Moullec; Thomas C Hulsey
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-05-10

Review 10.  Gestational weight gain across continents and ethnicity: systematic review and meta-analysis of maternal and infant outcomes in more than one million women.

Authors:  Rebecca F Goldstein; Sally K Abell; Sanjeeva Ranasinha; Marie L Misso; Jacqueline A Boyle; Cheryce L Harrison; Mary Helen Black; Nan Li; Gang Hu; Francesco Corrado; Hanne Hegaard; Young Ju Kim; Margaretha Haugen; Won O Song; Min Hyoung Kim; Annick Bogaerts; Roland Devlieger; Judith H Chung; Helena J Teede
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 8.775

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.