Literature DB >> 25414920

What conceptions of science communication are espoused by science research funding bodies?

Sarah E Palmer, Renato A Schibeci.   

Abstract

We examine the conceptions of science communication, especially in relation to "public engagement with science" (PES), evident in the literature and websites of science research funding bodies in Europe, North America, South America, Asia and Oceania, and Africa. The analysis uses a fourfold classification of science communication to situate these conceptions: professional, deficit, consultative and deliberative. We find that all bodies engage in professional communication (within the research community); however, engagement with the broader community is variable. Deficit (information dissemination) models still prevail but there is evidence of movement towards more deliberative, participatory models.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25414920     DOI: 10.1177/0963662512455295

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Underst Sci        ISSN: 0963-6625


  6 in total

1.  Fairness in Knowing: Science Communication and Epistemic Justice.

Authors:  Fabien Medvecky
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 2.  Communicating Science in the Digital and Social Media Ecosystem: Scoping Review and Typology of Strategies Used by Health Scientists.

Authors:  Guillaume Fontaine; Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte; Andréane Lavallée; Tanya Mailhot; Geneviève Rouleau; Julien Bouix-Picasso; Anne Bourbonnais
Journal:  JMIR Public Health Surveill       Date:  2019-09-03

Review 3.  Open science communication: The first year of the UK's Independent Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies.

Authors:  Martin McKee; Danny Altmann; Anthony Costello; Karl Friston; Zubaida Haque; Kamlesh Khunti; Susan Michie; Tolullah Oni; Christina Pagel; Deenan Pillay; Steve Reicher; Helen Salisbury; Gabriel Scally; Kit Yates; Linda Bauld; Laura Bear; John Drury; Melissa Parker; Ann Phoenix; Elizabeth Stokoe; Robert West
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 3.255

4.  Health and medical research funding agencies' promotion of public engagement within research: a qualitative interview study exploring the United Kingdom context.

Authors:  Jennifer E van Bekkum; Gillian M Fergie; Shona Hilton
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2016-03-24

5.  Turning the gaze: challenges of involving biomedical researchers in community engagement with research in Patan, Nepal.

Authors:  Siân Aggett
Journal:  Crit Public Health       Date:  2018-02-22

6.  Health science communication strategies used by researchers with the public in the digital and social media ecosystem: a systematic scoping review protocol.

Authors:  Guillaume Fontaine; Andréane Lavallée; Marc-André Maheu-Cadotte; Julien Bouix-Picasso; Anne Bourbonnais
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.