| Literature DB >> 25413574 |
Ashraf Al-Hadethe1, Nigel Hunt2, Shirley Thomas3, Abdulgaffar Al-Qaysi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: People in Iraq have been more or less continually exposed to war for more than three decades. Studies with Iraqi participants report high prevalence rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related problems.Entities:
Keywords: PTSD; Traumatic events; secondary school students
Year: 2014 PMID: 25413574 PMCID: PMC4247495 DOI: 10.3402/ejpt.v5.23928
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Psychotraumatol ISSN: 2000-8066
Number of participants according to frequency of traumatic events and type of exposure (N=403)
| Number of traumatic events | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–5 | 6–10 | 11–15 | 16 or more | Total | |
| Other and/or self exposed | 90 (22.3) | 100 (24.8) | 33 (8.2) | 6 (1.5) | 229 (56.8%) |
| Self exposed | 78 (19.3) | 5 (1.2) | 1 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 84 (20.8%) |
| Other exposed | 26 (6.4) | 1 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 27 (6.7%) |
| Total | 194 (48.1) | 106 (26.3) | 34 (8.4) | 6 (1.5) | 340 (84.4%) |
Prevalence of traumatic events according to gender
| Type of exposure | Self and other | Self only | Others only | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||
| Male | 128 (62.4%) | 64 (31.2%) | 13 (6.3%) | 205 (100%) | 12.38 |
| Female | 101 (74.8%) | 20 (14.8%) | 14 (10.4%) | 135 (100%) | |
| Total | 229 (67.4%) | 84 (24.7%) | 27 (7.9%) | 340 (100%) | |
p<0.05.
Prevalence of PTSD according to gender and categories of PTSD
| PTSD | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Fully,
| Partially,
| None,
| Total |
| Males | 120 (58.5) | 62 (30.2) | 23 (11.2) | 205 (60.3%) |
| Females | 89 (65.9) | 43 (31.8) | 3 (2.2) | 135 (39.7%) |
| Total | 209 (61.5) | 105 (30.9) | 26 (7.6) | 340 (100%) |
Relationships between number of PTSD symptoms and religious coping and social support
| Variables | Correlation with PTSD score |
|---|---|
| Religious coping | 0.053 |
| Positive sub scale of religious coping | 0.118 |
| Negative sub scale of religious coping | 0.018 |
| Social support received from family | −0.038 |
| Social support received from friends | 0.010 |
| Social support received from GNGO | 0.072 |
p<0.05.