Literature DB >> 25413499

RHD variants in Flanders, Belgium.

Vicky S T Van Sandt1, Christoph Gassner2, Marie-Paule Emonds1, Tobias J Legler3, Sarah Mahieu1,4, Günther F Körmöczi5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: D antigen variants may be grouped into partial D, weak D, and DEL types. Cumulative phenotype frequencies of these D variants may approach 1% in certain European regions. Unambiguous and quick identification of D variants is of immediate clinical relevance, with implications for transfusion strategy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 628 samples with ambiguous serologic results from different immunohematology laboratories throughout the Flanders region, Belgium, were genotyped using a commercially available weak D typing approach. After exclusion of detectable weak D types, molecular RHD exon scanning was performed for the remaining samples, and RHD sequencing was performed in two particular cases.
RESULTS: Of all samples investigated, 424 (67.5%) were positive for weak D Type 1, 2, or 3, and 22 cases (3.5%) typed weak D Type 4.0/4.1/4.3, 4.2, 5, 11, 15, or 17. Another 49 (7.8%) samples were partial D variants, with a major proportion being category DVI types (n = 27). One RHD(S103P) sample was identified as high-grade partial D, with DIII-like phenotype and anti-D and anti-C immunization. Additionally, a novel DVI Type 3 (A399T) variant was found. Of the remaining 133 samples mainly tested because of ambiguous serologic D typing results due to recent transfusion, 32 (5.1%) were negative for RHD, and 101 (16.1%) were indistinguishable from wild-type RHD and not investigated further.
CONCLUSION: Despite the enormous diversity of RHD alleles, first-line weak D genotyping was remarkably informative, allowing for rapid classification of most samples with conspicuous RhD phenotype in Flanders. The clinical implications are discussed.
© 2014 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25413499     DOI: 10.1111/trf.12947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  6 in total

1.  Strategies to identify candidates for D variant genotyping.

Authors:  Xunda Luo; Margaret A Keller; Ian James; Michelle Grant; Shiguang Liu; Kellie Simmons Massey; Andrew Czulewicz; Sandra Nance; Yanhua Li
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Anti-D reagents should be chosen accordingly to the prevalence of D variants in the obstetric population.

Authors:  Jelena Lukacevic Krstic; Slavica Dajak; Jasna Bingulac-Popovic; Vesna Dogic; Jela Mratinovic-Mikulandra
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  It's time to phase out "serologic weak D phenotype" and resolve D types with RHD genotyping including weak D type 4.

Authors:  Willy A Flegel; Gregory A Denomme; John T Queenan; Susan T Johnson; Margaret A Keller; Connie M Westhoff; Louis M Katz; Meghan Delaney; Ralph R Vassallo; Clayton D Simon; S Gerald Sandler
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Molecular and computational analysis of 45 samples with a serologic weak D phenotype detected among 132,479 blood donors in northeast China.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Guiji Li; Zhuren Zhou; Chaopeng Shao; Xuying Huang; Lichun Li; Xiaofeng Li; Ying Liu; Hua Fan; Jianping Li
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  RHD Genotyping of Rh-Negative and Weak D Phenotype among Blood Donors in Southeast Iran.

Authors:  Younes Sadeghi-Bojd; Naser Amirizadeh; Arezoo Oodi
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res       Date:  2021-10-01

6.  Impact on patient of the detection of weakly expressed RhD antigens in blood donors.

Authors:  Helio Moraes-Souza; Vitor Mendonça Alves
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2015-08-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.