Literature DB >> 25413383

Evaluating the use of commercial drug-specific calibrators for determining PT and APTT reagent sensitivity to dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

R C Gosselin1, D Adcock, E M Hawes, S J Francart, R P Grant, S Moll.   

Abstract

Suitable laboratory methodologies for quantifying the non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) include liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) or drug-calibrated assays such as the dilute thrombin time for dabigatran or anti-Xa measurements for rivaroxaban. In situations when these tests are unavailable, it has been suggested that using commercial drug calibrators on APTT and PT assays would theoretically provide reagent sensitivity to these drugs. The purpose of this study was to determine whether commercial drug calibrators deliver similar reagent sensitivity information as samples from patients receiving dabigatran or rivaroxaban as part of their routine care. Two laboratory sites tested commercial calibrator material for dabigatran and rivaroxaban (Hyphen Biomedical) using PT and APTT reagents and data was compared to samples collected from patients taking NOACs that were quantified by LC-MS/MS. Correlation statistics and calculating the amount of drug required to double the clotting time of normal plasma were performed. All drug calibrator material correlated more strongly (R²> 0.95) for any reagent/drug combination than patient samples (R² ranged from 0.29-0.86). Dabigatran calibrator results and patient data were equivalent for SynthASil and PTT-A APTT reagents. The dabigatran and rivaroxaban calibrator material over-estimated drug sensitivity for all PT reagents when compared to sensitivity data calculated based on drug levels obtained by LC-MS/MS from patient samples. In conclusion, drug-specific calibrators overestimated reagent sensitivity which may underestimate in vivo drug concentration in a given patient. Further studies are required to assess whether this method of determining relative sensitivity of NOAC on routine coagulation assays should be recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dabigatran; drug calibrators; reagent sensitivity; rivaroxaban

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25413383     DOI: 10.1160/TH14-04-0361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  6 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory Assessment of the Anticoagulant Activity of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Bethany T Samuelson; Adam Cuker; Deborah M Siegal; Mark Crowther; David A Garcia
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Measurement and reversal of the direct oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Bethany T Samuelson; Adam Cuker
Journal:  Blood Rev       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 8.250

3.  Atherothrombosis and Thromboembolism: Position Paper from the Second Maastricht Consensus Conference on Thrombosis.

Authors:  H M H Spronk; T Padro; J E Siland; J H Prochaska; J Winters; A C van der Wal; J J Posthuma; G Lowe; E d'Alessandro; P Wenzel; D M Coenen; P H Reitsma; W Ruf; R H van Gorp; R R Koenen; T Vajen; N A Alshaikh; A S Wolberg; F L Macrae; N Asquith; J Heemskerk; A Heinzmann; M Moorlag; N Mackman; P van der Meijden; J C M Meijers; M Heestermans; T Renné; S Dólleman; W Chayouâ; R A S Ariëns; C C Baaten; M Nagy; A Kuliopulos; J J Posma; P Harrison; M J Vries; H J G M Crijns; E A M P Dudink; H R Buller; Y M C Henskens; A Själander; S Zwaveling; O Erküner; J W Eikelboom; A Gulpen; F E C M Peeters; J Douxfils; R H Olie; T Baglin; A Leader; U Schotten; B Scaf; H M M van Beusekom; L O Mosnier; L van der Vorm; P Declerck; M Visser; D W J Dippel; V J Strijbis; K Pertiwi; A J Ten Cate-Hoek; H Ten Cate
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Real-world monitoring of direct oral anticoagulants in clinic and hospitalization settings.

Authors:  Seiji Takatsuki; Takehiro Kimura; Kazutaka Sugimoto; Sadaya Misaki; Kazuaki Nakajima; Shin Kashimura; Akira Kunitomi; Yoshinori Katsumata; Takahiko Nishiyama; Nobuhiro Nishiyama; Yoshiyasu Aizawa; Keiichi Fukuda
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2017-10-16

5.  The Comparison of Therapeutic Efficacy Between Dabigatran Versus Warfarin in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Hongxia Li; Lei Zhang; Ming Xia; Chi Zhang; Tingbo Jiang
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

6.  Analytical verification and comparison of chromogenic assays for dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban determination on BCSXP and STA Compact Max analysers.

Authors:  Ivana Ćelap; Sandra Margetić; Marija Brčić; Roman Mihić
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.