| Literature DB >> 25413327 |
Tarek M Mousa1, Alicia M Schiller1, Irving H Zucker1.
Abstract
Angiotensin II (Ang II) is well known to participate in the abnormal autonomic cardiovascular control that occurs during the development of chronic heart failure (CHF). Disrupted cardiovascular circadian rhythm in CHF is also well accepted; however, the mechanisms underlying and the role of central Ang II type 1 receptors (AT1R) and oxidative stress in mediating such changes are not clear. In a post myocardial infarction (MI) CHF mouse model we investigated the circadian rhythm for mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) following MI. The cardiovascular parameters represent the middle 6-h averages during daytime (6:00-18:00) and nighttime (18:00-6:00). HR increased with the severity of CHF reaching its maximum by 12 weeks post-MI; loss of circadian HR and BRS rhythms were observed as early as 4 weeks post-MI in conjunction with a significant blunting of the BRS and an upregulation in the AT1R and gp91(phox) proteins in the brainstem. Loss of MAP circadian rhythm was observed 8 weeks post-MI. Circadian AT1R expression was demonstrated in sham animals but was lost 8 weeks following MI. Losartan reduced AT1R expression in daytime (1.18 ± 0.1 vs. 0.85 ± 0.1; P < 0.05) with a trend toward a reduction in the AT1R mRNA expression in the nighttime (1.2 ± 0.1 vs. 1.0 ± 0.1; P > 0.05) but failed to restore circadian variability. The disruption of circadian rhythm for HR, MAP and BRS along with the upregulation of AT1 and gp91(phox) suggests a possible role for central oxidative stress as a mediator of circadian cardiovascular parameters in the post-MI state.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac dysfunction; cardiovascular reflex; diurnal variability; oxidative stress
Year: 2014 PMID: 25413327 PMCID: PMC4255816 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.12210
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Baseline cardiac function and fluid balance in sham and MI mice over time.
| 2‐Week Sham ( | 2‐WeekMI ( | 4‐Week Sham ( | 4‐Week MI ( | 8‐Week Sham ( | 8‐Week MI ( | 12‐Week Sham ( | 12‐Week MI ( | 16‐Week Sham ( | 16‐Week MI ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EF (%) | 72 ± 1 | 67 ± 2 | 78 ± 1 | 54 ± 3 | 75 ± 2 | 54 ± 5 | 77 ± 1 | 57 ± 4 | 75 ± 1 | 59 ± 1 |
| MI (%LV) | 38 ± 1 | 40 ± 1 | 39 ± 1 | 40 ± 1 | 40 ± 1 | |||||
| Water intake (mL/day) | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 5.5 ± 0.1 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 6.9 ± 0.4 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 6.8 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.7 | 7.3 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 7.7 ± 0.2 |
| Urine output (mL/day) | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
| HW/BW (mg/g) | 9 ± 1 | 8 ± 0.3 | 8 ± 1 | 13 ± 1 | 7 ± 1 | 11 ± 1 | 7 ± 1 | 10 ± 1 | 8 ± 1 | 11 ± 0.2 |
| Lung Wet Wt (g) | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.01 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.32 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.33 ± 0.01 |
| Body Weight (g) | 24.5 ± 1.0 | 23.6 ± 0.7 | 27.3 ± 1.0 | 24.8 ± 1.5 | 27.2 ± 0.6 | 27.3 ± 0.5 | 30.0 ± 0.6 | 30.2 ± 0.6 | 28.2 ± 1.6 | 28.2 ± 1.0 |
| Lung Dry Wt (g) | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.06 ± 0.0 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 |
P < 0.05 compared to the corresponding sham group.
Figure 1.Hemodynamic and spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity for both sham and MI mice over time, taken during the daytime (open squares) and nighttime (closed squares). MAP = mean arterial pressure; HR = heart rate; BRS = baroreflex sensitivity. Numbers in parentheses are the n per group.
Figure 2.Angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor protein and mRNA expression in the brainstem of mice at various time periods post‐MI compared to a group of sham‐operated mice. Samples acquired during the daytime period. For sham protein and mRNA, n = 9. For post‐MI time points n = 5 per time period.
Figure 3.gp91phox protein and mRNA expression in the brainstem of mice at various time periods post‐MI compared to a group of sham‐operated mice. Samples acquired during the daytime period. For sham protein n = 5. For sham mRNA, n = 9. For post‐MI time points n = 5 per time period.
Figure 4.Day–night comparisons of AT1R protein and mRNA expression in sham and MI mice at 8 weeks. There was a clear increase in brainstem AT1 protein during the nighttime hours in the sham group. MI mice showed an increase in AT1 protein in both daytime and nighttime periods. Losartan treatment lowered daytime expression in MI mice, but had little effect on the nighttime expression. Numbers in parentheses are the n per group.
AT1R and gp91phox protein in mouse hypothalamus in the sham state and 8 weeks post‐MI or post‐MI plus losartan treatment.
| 8‐week sham | 8‐week MI | 8‐week MI + losartan | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daytime ( | Nighttime ( | Daytime ( | Nighttime ( | Daytime ( | Nighttime ( | |
| AT1R protein (AT1/ | 0.3 ± 0.02 | 0.4 ± 0.02 | 0.8 ± 0.03 | 0.8 ± 0.03 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.02 |
| gp91phox protein (gp91/ | 0.4 ± 0.03 | 0.4 ± 0.03 | 0.6 ± 0.03 | 0.6 ± 0.03 | 0.6 ± 0.04 | 0.5 ± 0.01 |
P < 0.05 compared to 8‐week MI and 8‐week MI + losartan.