Literature DB >> 25412393

Bladder cancer collaborative stage variables and their data quality, usage, and clinical implications: a review of SEER data, 2004-2010.

Mary E Charlton1, Margaret Peggy Adamo, Leon Sun, Sundeep Deorah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several changes were made to bladder cancer staging guidelines between the 6th and 7th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual. Also, Collaborative Stage (CS) Data Collection System version 2 (CSv2) implemented for 2010 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cases involved collection of 3 new site-specific factors (SSFs): World Health Organization/International Society of Urological pathology grade (SSF1), size of metastasis in regional lymph nodes (SSF2), and extranodal extension (SSF3). Our objective was to evaluate these new SSFs to assist researchers in their use/interpretation and to describe data quality issues to be addressed moving forward.
METHODS: Staging trends were assessed for invasive and noninvasive bladder cancer cases from 2004 to 2010. Among 2010 cases, staging was compared using the AJCC 6th and 7th edition guidelines, and evaluation of completeness/quality of the SSFs was performed in relevant subgroups.
RESULTS: Age-adjusted incidence rates and proportions of cases by stage remained steady from 2004 to 2010. Changes from the AJCC 6th to 7th editions caused no substantial movement between stages. SSF1 had a known value in 82% of cases, which was higher than the traditional SEER grade/differentiation variable. SSF2 and SSF3 were less complete, with 41% and 37% having known values, respectively, among cases with lymph node involvement (according to CS lymph node variable).
CONCLUSIONS: SSF1 was more complete and straightforward to interpret than the traditional grade/differentiation variable. SSF2 and SSF3 were less complete, may be associated with data quality issues, and should only be used among cases with known lymph node involvement.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SEER; bladder cancer; data quality; staging

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25412393      PMCID: PMC4267579          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  Prognostic implications of extracapsular extension of pelvic lymph node metastases in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Achim Fleischmann; George N Thalmann; Regula Markwalder; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  Pelvic lymph node metastases from bladder cancer: outcome in 83 patients after radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  R D Mills; W H Turner; A Fleischmann; R Markwalder; G N Thalmann; U E Studer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Problems in cancer surveillance: delineating in situ and invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  B F Hankey; B K Edwards; L A Ries; C L Percy; E Shambaugh
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-03-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 4.  The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee.

Authors:  J I Epstein; M B Amin; V R Reuter; F K Mostofi
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Characteristics of lymph node metastases defining the outcome after radical cystectomy of urothelial bladder carcinoma.

Authors:  Tohru Nakagawa; Yae Kanai; Hiroyuki Nakanishi; Motokiyo Komiyama; Hiroyuki Fujimoto
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Cancer statistics, 2009.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Yongping Hao; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Critical evaluation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM nodal staging system in patients with lymph node-positive disease after radical cystectomy.

Authors:  H Max Bruins; Ryan P Dorin; Barbara Rubino; Gus Miranda; Jie Cai; Siamak Daneshmand; Eila C Skinner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  The new World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) classification for TA, T1 bladder tumors: is it an improvement?

Authors:  Jonathan I Epstein
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.312

9.  Cancer registry problems in classifying invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  C F Lynch; C E Platz; M P Jones; J M Gazzaniga
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1991-03-20       Impact factor: 13.506

  9 in total
  12 in total

1.  Association between lymph node yield and survival among patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper tract.

Authors:  Piotr Zareba; Barak Rosenzweig; Andrew G Winer; Jonathan A Coleman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Lymph node yield and tumor location in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma undergoing nephroureterectomy affects survival: A U.S. population-based analysis (2004-2012).

Authors:  Meera R Chappidi; Max Kates; Michael H Johnson; Noah M Hahn; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Phillip M Pierorazio
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.498

3.  Treatment of Non-Metastatic Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO Guideline.

Authors:  Sam S Chang; Bernard H Bochner; Roger Chou; Robert Dreicer; Ashish M Kamat; Seth P Lerner; Yair Lotan; Joshua J Meeks; Jeff M Michalski; Todd M Morgan; Diane Z Quale; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Anthony L Zietman; Jeffrey M Holzbeierlein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Diagnostic and prognostic values of upregulated SPC25 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiaolin Yang; Hongzhi Sun; Ying Song; Li Yang; Haibo Liu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Review of the Clinical Approaches to the Use of Urine-based Tumor Markers in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Timothy Clinton; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-10-16

6.  Positive association between hypertension and urinary bladder cancer: epidemiologic evidence involving 79,236 propensity score-matched individuals.

Authors:  Victor C Kok; Han-Wei Zhang; Chin-Teng Lin; Shih-Chung Huang; Ming-Feng Wu
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.384

7.  The effectiveness of chemotherapy for patients with pT3N0M0 renal pelvic urothelial carcinomas: An inverse probability of treatment weighting comparison using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data.

Authors:  Zefu Liu; Jialing Huang; Xiangdong Li; Chaowen Huang; Yunlin Ye; Jinxin Zhang; Zhouwei Liu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Unique somatic variants in DNA from urine exosomes of individuals with bladder cancer.

Authors:  Xunian Zhou; Paul Kurywchak; Kerri Wolf-Dennen; Sara P Y Che; Dinanath Sulakhe; Mark D'Souza; Bingqing Xie; Natalia Maltsev; T Conrad Gilliam; Chia-Chin Wu; Kathleen M McAndrews; Valerie S LeBleu; David J McConkey; Olga V Volpert; Shanna M Pretzsch; Bogdan A Czerniak; Colin P Dinney; Raghu Kalluri
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.698

9.  p53 expression in repair/reactive renal tubular cells: A potential pitfall leading to a false-positive diagnosis of urine cytology.

Authors:  Kaori Enomoto; Toru Matsunaga; Tadashi Sofue; Akihiro Nakamura; Eiichiro Hirakawa; Emi Ibuki; Reiji Haba; Shingo Kamoshida; Hiroyuki Ohsaki
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Does perioperative chemotherapy improve survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma? A population based analysis.

Authors:  Hanan Goldberg; Zachary Klaassen; Thenappan Chandrasekar; Rashid Sayyid; Girish S Kulkarni; Robert J Hamilton; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.