Literature DB >> 25412390

Analysis of stage and clinical/prognostic factors for lung cancer from SEER registries: AJCC staging and collaborative stage data collection system.

Vivien W Chen1, Bernardo A Ruiz, Mei-Chin Hsieh, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Lynn A G Ries, Denise R Lewis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition introduced major changes in the staging of lung cancer, including the tumor (T), node (N), metastasis (M)-TNM-system and new stage/prognostic site-specific factors (SSFs), collected under the Collaborative Stage Version 2 (CSv2) Data Collection System. The intent was to improve the stage precision that could guide treatment options and ultimately lead to better survival. This report examines stage trends, the change in stage distributions from the AJCC 6th to the 7th edition, and findings of the prognostic SSFs for 2010 lung cancer cases.
METHODS: Data were from the November 2012 submission of 18 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program population-based registries. A total of 344,797 cases of lung cancer, diagnosed in 2004-2010, were analyzed.
RESULTS: The percentages of small tumors and early-stage lung cancer cases increased from 2004 to 2010. The AJCC 7th edition, implemented for 2010 diagnosis year, subclassified tumor size and reclassified multiple tumor nodules, pleural effusions, and involvement of tumors in the contralateral lung, resulting in a slight decrease in stage IB and stage IIIB and a small increase in stage IIA and stage IV. Overall about 80% of cases remained the same stage group in the AJCC 6th and 7th editions. About 21% of lung cancer patients had separate tumor nodules in the ipsilateral (same) lung, and 23% of the surgically resected patients had visceral pleural invasion, both adverse prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible for high-quality population-based registries such as the SEER Program to collect more refined staging and prognostic SSFs that allows better categorization of lung cancer patients with different clinical outcomes and to assess their survival.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AJCC; collaborative stage; lung cancer; prognostic site-specific factors

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25412390      PMCID: PMC4239667          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  21 in total

1.  Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging.

Authors:  C F Mountain; C M Dresler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Survival after pathological stage IA nonsmall cell lung cancer: tumor size matters.

Authors:  Ozcan Birim; A Pieter Kappetein; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Rob J van Klaveren; Ad J J C Bogers
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Cancer statistics, 2014.

Authors:  Rebecca Siegel; Jiemin Ma; Zhaohui Zou; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Patterns and causes of gender differences in smoking.

Authors:  I Waldron
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Survival after resection for primary lung cancer: a population based study of 3211 resected patients.

Authors:  T-E Strand; H Rostad; B Møller; J Norstein
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Changes in smoking status affect women more than men: results of the Lung Health Study.

Authors:  John E Connett; Robert P Murray; A Sonia Buist; Robert A Wise; William C Bailey; Paula G Lindgren; Gregory R Owens
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Outcome of patients with lung cancer detected incidentally.

Authors:  Maki Kanashiki; Hiroaki Satoh; Hiroichi Ishikawa; Morio Ohtsuka; Kiyohisa Sekizawa
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 8.  Screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation.

Authors:  Linda L Humphrey; Mark Deffebach; Miranda Pappas; Christina Baumann; Kathryn Artis; Jennifer Priest Mitchell; Bernadette Zakher; Rongwei Fu; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the T descriptors in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer.

Authors:  Ramón Rami-Porta; David Ball; John Crowley; Dorothy J Giroux; James Jett; William D Travis; Masahiro Tsuboi; Eric Vallières; Peter Goldstraw
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 15.609

View more
  59 in total

Review 1.  Locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer: shall immunotherapy be a new chance?

Authors:  Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Jacopo Di Muzio; Serena Badellino; Cristina Mantovani; Umberto Ricardi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  We should be done in such a way that patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer who would benefit from surgery are not overlooked.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Chikaishi; Ayako Hirai; Naoko Imanishi; Yoshinobu Ichiki; Fumihiro Tanaka
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Association between expression of nuclear receptor co-activator 5 protein and prognosis in postoperative patients with osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Ya Wu; Jian Wu; Qi-Rong Dong; Nai-Zhou Guo
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  How to scan who: the delicate balance between selecting the patient and selecting the imaging protocol.

Authors:  Roland Hustinx
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Modern radiotherapy using image guidance for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer can improve outcomes in patients treated with chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Matthew P Deek; Sinae Kim; Ning Yue; Rekha Baby; Inaya Ahmed; Wei Zou; John Langenfeld; Joseph Aisner; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Is multidisciplinary management possible in the treatment of lung cancer? A report from three Italian meetings.

Authors:  Davide Franceschini; Alessio Bruni; Paolo Borghetti; Niccolò Giaj-Levra; Sara Ramella; Lucio Buffoni; Serena Badellino; Maria Andolina; Camilla Comin; Emanuela Vattemi; Michela Bezzi; Marco Trovò; Antonio Passaro; Alessandra Bearz; Rita Chiari; Franchina Tindara; Katia Ferrari; Gaia Piperno; Andrea Riccardo Filippi; Domenico Genovesi; Vieri Scotti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Significance of Trask protein interactions in brain metastatic cohorts of lung cancers.

Authors:  Hua Wu; Li-Qun Shang; Rui-Lin Chen; Shu-Mei Yang; Shui-Li Wang; Jun Wang; Gang Sun
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-01-21

8.  Thoracic Vertebral Body Irradiation Contributes to Acute Hematologic Toxicity During Chemoradiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew P Deek; Brian Benenati; Sinae Kim; Ting Chen; Inaya Ahmed; Wei Zou; Joseph Aisner; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 9.  From Diagnosis to Treatment: Clinical Applications of Nanotechnology in Thoracic Surgery.

Authors:  Christopher S Digesu; Sophie C Hofferberth; Mark W Grinstaff; Yolonda L Colson
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.750

10.  Therapeutic landscape of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in Canada in 2020.

Authors:  A Elkrief; P Joubert; M Florescu; M Tehfe; N Blais; B Routy
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.