Literature DB >> 25412328

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Obtained by RTVue OCT, Lenstar, Sirius Topography, and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Healthy Subjects.

Ali Şimşek1, Şemsettin Bilak1, Mete Güler1, Musa Çapkin1, Burak Bilgin2, Ali Hakim Reyhan1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement results obtained by RTVue OCT, Lenstar, Sirius topography, and ultrasound pachymetry (UP) (OcuScan RxP Ophthalmic Ultrasound System, Alcon Laboratories) in healthy subjects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 256 eyes of 128 healthy subjects were included in the study. CCT measurements were obtained from the eyes for each subject using the UP, Lenstar, Sirius topography, and RTVue OCT instruments. Ultrasound pachymetry measurements were performed after the eyes were anesthetized with one drop of 0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride and were performed at the same day after 15 minutes after previous measurements.
RESULTS: Of 128 participants, 84 were male and 44 were female with a mean age of 33.15 ± 12.95 years (ranging from 18 to 75 years). The mean CCTs for UP, Lenstar, Sirius topography, and RTVue OCT were 535.60 ± 35.15 (440,00-668,00); 532.63 ± 34.44 (449,00-650,00); 526.05 ± 36.45 (314,00-640,00); 525.89 ± 33.21 (437,00-646,00) µm, respectively. The mean CCT measurements were statistically different among the three groups (p = 0.002). CCT measurements obtained using RTVue-OCT were significantly thinner than those obtained using UP (p = 0.009). Sirius CCT measurements were also thinner than UP (p = 0.011). Mean CCT measurements between UP and Lenstar were similar (p = 0.769). Measurements with Lenstar (r = 0.849), Sirius topography (r = 0.883), and RTVue OCT (0.949) were highly correlated with UP measurements.
CONCLUSION: RTVue OCT and Sirius topography significantly underestimated the CCT compared with UP. Although highly correlated, the measurement values with these devices are not directly interchangeable in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central corneal thickness; Lenstar; Pachymetry; RTVue OCT; Sirius topography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25412328     DOI: 10.3109/08820538.2014.962173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0882-0538            Impact factor:   1.975


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of central corneal thickness with four different optical devices.

Authors:  Kuddusi Teberik; Mehmet Tahir Eski; Murat Kaya; Handan Ankaralı
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Clinical features and visual function in a patient with Fish-eye disease: Quantitative measurements and optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Masanori Kanai; Shizuka Koh; Daisaku Masuda; Masahiro Koseki; Kohji Nishida
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2018-02-24

3.  Morphogeometric analysis for characterization of keratoconus considering the spatial localization and projection of apex and minimum corneal thickness point.

Authors:  Jose S Velázquez; Francisco Cavas; David P Piñero; Francisco J F Cañavate; Jorge Alio Del Barrio; Jorge L Alio
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 10.479

4.  Sirius Scheimpflug-Placido versus ultrasound pachymetry for central corneal thickness: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yili Jin; Colm McAlinden; Yong Sun; Daizong Wen; Yiran Wang; Jinjin Yu; Ke Feng; Benhao Song; Qinmei Wang; Shihao Chen; Jinhai Huang
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2021-02-18

5.  The Role of Back Optic Zone Diameter in Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Lenses.

Authors:  Jaume Pauné; Silvia Fonts; Lina Rodríguez; Antonio Queirós
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three different optical devices.

Authors:  Mehmet Barış Üçer; Erdinç Bozkurt
Journal:  Ther Adv Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.