Literature DB >> 25412241

[Systematic analysis of the readability of patient information on the websites of clinics for plastic surgery].

B Janghorban Esfahani1, A Faron1, K S Roth2, H-E Schaller1, F Medved1, J-C Lüers3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Internet is becoming increasing-ly important as a source of information for patients in medical issues. However, many patients have problems to adequately understand texts, especially with medical content. A basic requirement to understand a written text is the read-ability of a text. The aim of the present study was to examine texts on the websites of German -plastic-surgical hospitals with patient information regarding their readability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this study, the read-ability of texts of 27 major departments of plastic and Hand surgery in Germany was systematically analysed using 5 recognised readability indices. First, texts were searched based on 20 representative key words and themes. Thereafter, texts were assigned to one of 3 major themes in order to enable statistical analysis. In addition to the 5 readability indices, further objective text parameters were also recorded.
RESULTS: Overall, 288 texts were found for analyzation. Most articles were found on the topic of "handsurgery" (n=124), less were found for "facial plastic surgery" (n=80) and "flaps, breast and reconstructive surgery" (n=84). Consistently, all readability indices showed a poor readability for the vast majority of analysed texts with the text appearing readable only for readers with a higher educational level. No significant differences in readability were found between the 3 major themes.
CONCLUSION: Especially in the communication of medical information, it is important to consider the knowledge and education of the addressee. The texts studied consistently showed a readability that is understandable only for academics. Thus, a large part of the intended target group is probably not reached. In order to adequately deliver online information material, a revision of the analysed internet texts appears to be recommendable. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25412241     DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1385936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir        ISSN: 0722-1819            Impact factor:   1.018


  1 in total

1.  [Comprehensibility of online-based patient education material in ophthalmology].

Authors:  N Heim; A Faron; J Fuchs; M Martini; R H Reich; K Löffler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.059

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.