Literature DB >> 25412237

Reply to Comment on: 'Possible pro-carcinogenic association of endotoxin on lung cancer among Shanghai women textile workers'.

H Checkoway1, J I Lundin2, S Costello3, R M Ray4, W Li4, E A Eisen3, G Astrakianakis5, K Applebaum6, D L Gao7, D B Thomas4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25412237      PMCID: PMC4647246          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We appreciate the thoughtful comments by Rylander and Jacobs (2014) on our paper (Checkoway ). The absence of an inverse exposure–response relation for endotoxin and lung cancer in the extended follow-up was somewhat unexpected in view of the reported consistent findings from numerous prior studies, including our initial follow-up of the Shanghai textile worker cohort (Astrakianakis ). Although neither the modest excess relative risks observed nor the exposure–response trend for exposures >15 years since first exposure (Table 3) were statistically significant, the findings are somewhat suggestive of a possible late pro-carcinogenic effect. We do not believe that our observations on endotoxin exposure and lung cancer risk necessarily challenge a well-established association. Instead, we would argue that the exposure–response association may change over time owing to complex, yet poorly understood, underlying mechanisms. We are also not the first to report that an inverse association between endotoxin and lung cancer risk may be time varying, diminishing over time (Mastrangelo ). We have acknowledged the absence of data on risk factors other than active smoking, such as indoor air pollution from cooking fuels and diet. However, it is highly unlikely that either indoor air pollution or diet was correlated with endotoxin exposure in this cohort, and thus were probably not important confounders. Socio-economic status was relatively homogenous in the cohort, and also was unlikely to have been a confounder. Our exposure assessment for endotoxin (Astrakianakis ) did take into account temporal changes in exposure levels during the cohort's relevant work experience, to the extent that available historical data permitted. Endotoxin is a highly variable exposure, and as we noted in the paper, some exposure misclassification was inevitable. We encourage analyses that consider temporal patterns of association in other endotoxin-exposed study populations, which can provide valuable insights into disease aetiology and pathogenesis.
  4 in total

1.  Lung cancer risk: effect of dairy farming and the consequence of removing that occupational exposure.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mastrangelo; John M Grange; Emanuela Fadda; Ugo Fedeli; Alessandra Buja; John H Lange
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Modeling, estimation and validation of cotton dust and endotoxin exposures in Chinese textile operations.

Authors:  George Astrakianakis; Noah S Seixas; Janice E Camp; David C Christiani; Ziding Feng; David B Thomas; Harvey Checkoway
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2006-04-21

3.  Lung cancer risk among female textile workers exposed to endotoxin.

Authors:  George Astrakianakis; Noah S Seixas; Roberta Ray; Janice E Camp; Dao Li Gao; Ziding Feng; Wenjin Li; Karen J Wernli; E Dawn Fitzgibbons; David B Thomas; Harvey Checkoway
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Possible pro-carcinogenic association of endotoxin on lung cancer among Shanghai women textile workers.

Authors:  H Checkoway; J I Lundin; S Costello; R Ray; W Li; E A Eisen; G Astrakianakis; N Seixas; K Applebaum; D L Gao; D B Thomas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Cancer prevention and control: alarming challenges in China.

Authors:  Ann M Bode; Zigang Dong; Hongyang Wang
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 17.275

Review 2.  Textile industry and occupational cancer.

Authors:  Zorawar Singh; Pooja Chadha
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.646

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.