Literature DB >> 25411817

Adverse events and discomfort during magnetic resonance imaging in cochlear implant recipients.

Bo Gyung Kim1, Jin Won Kim2, Jeong Jin Park2, Sung Huhn Kim2, Hee Nam Kim3, Jae Young Choi2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Patients with cochlear implants (CIs) should be fully informed before undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) about the possibility of discomfort or pain. Prior to an MRI scan, patients need to fully understand not only the potential complications but also the potential discomfort that they may experience during the scan.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the adverse events during MRI in patients with CIs and to investigate the safety and diagnostic efficiency of MRI in patients with CIs with internal magnets. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Retrospective review of the medical records of 18 patients with CIs undergoing MRI between September 2003 and February 2014 at a single tertiary referral center.
INTERVENTIONS: Sixteen patients underwent MRI in a 1.5-T scanner, and 2 patients underwent MRI in a 3.0-T scanner. Twelve brain MRI scans were performed, and 18 MRI scans were performed in areas outside the brain. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Discomfort or pain, adverse events, and auditory performance after MRI were evaluated using medical records or interviews.
RESULTS: Thirteen of 18 patients completed their MRI scans (25 of 30 scans). Five patients with head bandages were unable to complete their MRI scans owing to pain; one of these patients experienced magnet displacement, and another underwent surgery for magnet removal and reinsertion. Finally, 1 patient experienced polarity reversal of the magnet. Artifacts induced by the CI internal magnet compromised the diagnosis of ipsilateral brain lesions under 1.5-T MRI. Auditory performance in the CI recipients who had major events was unaffected. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Even with protective head bandages, 1.5-T MRI in patients with CIs led to a variety of adverse events, including discomfort or pain and displacement of the internal magnet. Therefore, sedation and careful head positioning may be appropriate for some patients with CIs who undergo MRI, and these patients should be carefully monitored to decrease the likelihood of such adverse effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25411817     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2014.2926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  20 in total

1.  Cochlear implant update.

Authors:  V Kumar
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Bone Conduction Implants for Hearing Rehabilitation in Skull Base Tumor Patients.

Authors:  Lauren Placke; Eric N Appelbaum; Akash J Patel; Alex D Sweeney
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-02-06

Review 3.  Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants.

Authors:  I Todt; G Rademacher; P Mittmann; S Mutze; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  [Postoperative imaging of the internal auditory canal : Visualization of active auditory implants. German version].

Authors:  I Todt; G Rademacher; P Mittmann; S Mutze; A Ernst
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Comparison of bandaging techniques to prevent cochlear implant magnet displacement following MRI.

Authors:  Martin Leinung; Andreas G Loth; Michaela Kroth; Iris Burck; Timo Stöver; Silke Helbig
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  [MRI in patients with auditory implants equipped with implanted magnets-an update : Overview and procedural management].

Authors:  S Nospes; M A Brockmann; A Läßig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Cochlear implants and 1.5 T MRI scans: the effect of diametrically bipolar magnets and screw fixation on pain.

Authors:  Ingo Todt; Grit Rademacher; Gloria Grupe; Andreas Stratmann; Arne Ernst; Sven Mutze; Philipp Mittmann
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-02-05

Review 8.  Safety of active auditory implants in magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Guy Fierens; Nina Standaert; Ronald Peeters; Christ Glorieux; Nicolas Verhaert
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2021-01-06

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the bone conduction implant - a pilot study at 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Karl-Johan Fredén Jansson; Bo Håkansson; Sabine Reinfeldt; Cristina Rigato; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-10-23

Review 10.  Hearing Restoration in Neurofibromatosis Type II Patients.

Authors:  Jeon Mi Lee; Jin Woo Chang; Jae Young Choi; Won Seok Chang; In Seok Moon
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.