Literature DB >> 25411367

(4-(Bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl)piperazin-1-yl)(cyclohexyl)methanone hydrochloride (LDK1229): a new cannabinoid CB1 receptor inverse agonist from the class of benzhydryl piperazine analogs.

Mariam M Mahmoud1, Teresa Olszewska1, Hui Liu1, Derek M Shore1, Dow P Hurst1, Patricia H Reggio1, Dai Lu1, Debra A Kendall2.   

Abstract

Some inverse agonists of cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1) have been demonstrated to be anorectic antiobesity drug candidates. However, the first generation of CB1 inverse agonists, represented by rimonabant (SR141716A), otenabant, and taranabant, are centrally active, with a high level of psychiatric side effects. Hence, the discovery of CB1 inverse agonists with a chemical scaffold distinct from these holds promise for developing peripherally active CB1 inverse agonists with fewer side effects. We generated a new CB1 inverse agonist, (4-(bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl)piperazin-1-yl)(cyclohexyl)methanone hydrochloride (LDK1229), from the class of benzhydryl piperazine analogs. This compound binds to CB1 more selectively than cannabinoid receptor type 2, with a Ki value of 220 nM. Comparable CB1 binding was also observed by analogs 1-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl]-4-cinnamylpiperazine dihydrochloride (LDK1203) and 1-[bis(4-fluorophenyl)methyl]-4-tosylpiperazine hydrochloride (LDK1222), which differed by the substitution on the piperazine ring where the piperazine of LDK1203 and LDK1222 are substituted by an alkyl group and a tosyl group, respectively. LDK1229 exhibits efficacy comparable with SR141716A in antagonizing the basal G protein coupling activity of CB1, as indicated by a reduction in guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding. Consistent with inverse agonist behavior, increased cell surface localization of CB1 upon treatment with LDK1229 was also observed. Although docking and mutational analysis showed that LDK1229 forms similar interactions with the receptor as SR141716A does, the benzhydryl piperazine scaffold is structurally distinct from the first-generation CB1 inverse agonists. It offers new opportunities for developing novel CB1 inverse agonists through the optimization of molecular properties, such as the polar surface area and hydrophilicity, to reduce the central activity observed with SR141716A.
Copyright © 2014 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25411367      PMCID: PMC4293445          DOI: 10.1124/mol.114.095471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  71 in total

1.  Analysis of cell movement by simultaneous quantification of local membrane displacement and fluorescent intensities using Quimp2.

Authors:  Leonard Bosgraaf; Peter J M van Haastert; Till Bretschneider
Journal:  Cell Motil Cytoskeleton       Date:  2009-03

2.  Regions of the alpha 1-adrenergic receptor involved in coupling to phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and enhanced sensitivity of biological function.

Authors:  S Cotecchia; S Exum; M G Caron; R J Lefkowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA.

Authors:  C Chen; H Okayama
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction.

Authors:  Y Cheng; W H Prusoff
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1973-12-01       Impact factor: 5.858

5.  A ternary complex model explains the agonist-specific binding properties of the adenylate cyclase-coupled beta-adrenergic receptor.

Authors:  A De Lean; J M Stadel; R J Lefkowitz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1980-08-10       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Cannabinoid inhibition of adenylate cyclase. Pharmacology of the response in neuroblastoma cell membranes.

Authors:  A C Howlett; R M Fleming
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 7.  Cannabinoid physiology and pharmacology: 30 years of progress.

Authors:  Allyn C Howlett; Christopher S Breivogel; Steven R Childers; Samuel A Deadwyler; Robert E Hampson; Linda J Porrino
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 8.  Cannabinoid receptor antagonists: pharmacological opportunities, clinical experience, and translational prognosis.

Authors:  David R Janero; Alexandros Makriyannis
Journal:  Expert Opin Emerg Drugs       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  Constitutive endocytic cycle of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor.

Authors:  Christophe Leterrier; Damien Bonnard; Damien Carrel; Jean Rossier; Zsolt Lenkei
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  A ligand channel through the G protein coupled receptor opsin.

Authors:  Peter W Hildebrand; Patrick Scheerer; Jung Hee Park; Hui-Woog Choe; Ronny Piechnick; Oliver P Ernst; Klaus Peter Hofmann; Martin Heck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Minireview: From the bench, toward the clinic: therapeutic opportunities for cannabinoid receptor modulation.

Authors:  Robert P Picone; Debra A Kendall
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-04-13

2.  Discovery of Selective Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor Agonists by High-Throughput Screening.

Authors:  Lisa M Ogawa; Neil T Burford; Yu-Hsien Liao; Caitlin E Scott; Ashley M Hine; Craig Dowling; Jefferson Chin; Mike Power; Edward J Hunnicutt; Victoria L Emerick; Martyn Banks; Litao Zhang; Samuel W Gerritz; Andrew Alt; Debra A Kendall
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.341

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.