Literature DB >> 25411185

Quantitative cell-free circulating BRAFV600E mutation analysis by use of droplet digital PCR in the follow-up of patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF inhibitors.

Miguel F Sanmamed1, Sara Fernández-Landázuri2, Carmen Rodríguez2, Ruth Zárate3, María D Lozano4, Leyre Zubiri1, José Luis Perez-Gracia1, Salvador Martín-Algarra1, Alvaro González5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Around 50% of cutaneous melanomas harbor the BRAF(V600E) mutation and can be treated with BRAF inhibitors. DNA carrying this mutation can be released into circulation as cell-free BRAF(V600E) (cfBRAF(V600E)). Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is an analytically sensitive technique for quantifying small concentrations of DNA. We studied the plasma concentrations of cfBRAF(V600E) by ddPCR in patients with melanoma during therapy with BRAF inhibitors.
METHODS: Plasma concentrations of cfBRAF(V600E) were measured in 8 controls and 20 patients with advanced melanoma having the BRAF(V600E) mutation during treatment with BRAF inhibitors at baseline, first month, best response, and progression.
RESULTS: The BRAF(V600E) mutation was detected by ddPCR even at a fractional abundance of 0.005% in the wild-type gene. Agreement between tumor tissue BRAF(V600E) and plasma cfBRAF(V600E) was 84.3%. Baseline cfBRAF(V600E) correlated with tumor burden (r = 0.742, P < 0.001). cfBRAF(V600E) concentrations decreased significantly at the first month of therapy (basal median, 216 copies/mL; Q1-Q3, 27-647 copies/mL; first response median, 0 copies/mL; Q1-Q3, 0-49 copies/mL; P < 0.01) and at the moment of best response (median, 0 copies/mL; Q1-Q3, 0-33 copies/mL; P < 0.01). At progression, there was a significant increase in the concentration of cfBRAF(V600E) compared with best response (median, 115 copies/mL; Q1-Q3, 3-707 copies/mL; P = 0.013). Lower concentrations of basal cfBRAF(V600E) were significantly associated with longer overall survival and progression-free survival (27.7 months and 9 months, respectively) than higher basal concentrations (8.6 months and 3 months, P < 0.001 and P = 0.024, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: cfBRAF(V600E) quantification in plasma by ddPCR is useful as a follow-up to treatment response in patients with advanced melanoma.
© 2014 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25411185     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2014.230235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  88 in total

Review 1.  Droplet microfluidics for high-sensitivity and high-throughput detection and screening of disease biomarkers.

Authors:  Aniruddha M Kaushik; Kuangwen Hsieh; Tza-Huei Wang
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2018-05-24

2.  Prospective Validation of Rapid Plasma Genotyping for the Detection of EGFR and KRAS Mutations in Advanced Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Adrian G Sacher; Cloud Paweletz; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Ryan S Alden; Allison O'Connell; Nora Feeney; Stacy L Mach; Pasi A Jänne; Geoffrey R Oxnard
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 3.  The Role of BEAMing and Digital PCR for Multiplexed Analysis in Molecular Oncology in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing.

Authors:  Jérôme Alexandre Denis; Erell Guillerm; Florence Coulet; Annette K Larsen; Jean-Marc Lacorte
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.074

4.  Clonal evolution and resistance to EGFR blockade in the blood of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Giulia Siravegna; Benedetta Mussolin; Michela Buscarino; Giorgio Corti; Andrea Cassingena; Giovanni Crisafulli; Agostino Ponzetti; Chiara Cremolini; Alessio Amatu; Calogero Lauricella; Simona Lamba; Sebastijan Hobor; Antonio Avallone; Emanuele Valtorta; Giuseppe Rospo; Enzo Medico; Valentina Motta; Carlotta Antoniotti; Fabiana Tatangelo; Beatriz Bellosillo; Silvio Veronese; Alfredo Budillon; Clara Montagut; Patrizia Racca; Silvia Marsoni; Alfredo Falcone; Ryan B Corcoran; Federica Di Nicolantonio; Fotios Loupakis; Salvatore Siena; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Alberto Bardelli
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  Detection of Solid Tumor Molecular Residual Disease (MRD) Using Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA).

Authors:  Re-I Chin; Kevin Chen; Abul Usmani; Chanelle Chua; Peter K Harris; Michael S Binkley; Tej D Azad; Jonathan C Dudley; Aadel A Chaudhuri
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.074

6.  Isolation and Quantification of Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA from Melanoma Patients.

Authors:  Gabriela Marsavela; Anna Reid; Elin S Gray; Leslie Calapre
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

7.  Circulating Tumor DNA as an Early Indicator of Response to T-cell Transfer Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Liqiang Xi; Trinh Hoc-Tran Pham; Eden C Payabyab; Richard M Sherry; Steven A Rosenberg; Mark Raffeld
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Latest development of liquid biopsy.

Authors:  Alvin Ho-Kwan Cheung; Chit Chow; Ka-Fai To
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  A phase II study of combined therapy with a BRAF inhibitor (vemurafenib) and interleukin-2 (aldesleukin) in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Meghan J Mooradian; Alexandre Reuben; Peter A Prieto; Mehlika Hazar-Rethinam; Dennie T Frederick; Brandon Nadres; Adriano Piris; Vikram Juneja; Zachary A Cooper; Arlene H Sharpe; Ryan B Corcoran; Keith T Flaherty; Donald P Lawrence; Jennifer A Wargo; Ryan J Sullivan
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 10.  Circulating Tumor Cells, DNA, and mRNA: Potential for Clinical Utility in Patients With Melanoma.

Authors:  Melody J Xu; Jay F Dorsey; Ravi Amaravadi; Giorgos Karakousis; Charles B Simone; Xiaowei Xu; Wei Xu; Erica L Carpenter; Lynn Schuchter; Gary D Kao
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-11-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.