Literature DB >> 25411051

A ratiometric-based measure of gene co-expression.

Anna C T Abelin, Georgi K Marinov, Brian A Williams, Kenneth McCue, Barbara J Wold1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gene co-expression analysis has previously been based on measures that include correlation coefficients and mutual information, as well as newcomers such as MIC. These measures depend primarily on the degree of association between the RNA levels of two genes and to a lesser extent on their variability. They focus on the similarity of expression value trajectories that change in like manner across samples. However there are relationships of biological interest for which these classical measures are expected to be insensitive. These include genes whose expression levels are ratiometrically stable and genes whose variance is tightly constrained. Large-scale studies of relatively homogeneous samples, including single cell RNA-seq, are experimental settings in which such relationships might be especially pertinent.
RESULTS: We develop and implement a ratiometric approach for detecting gene associations (abbreviated RA). It is based on the coefficient of variation of the measured expression ratio of each pair of genes. We apply it to a collection of lymphoblastoid RNA-seq data from the 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, a typical sample set with high overall homogeneity. RA is a selective method, reporting in this case ~1/4 of all possible gene pairs, yet these relationships include a distilled picture of biological relationships previously found by other methods. In addition, RA reveals expression relationships that are not detected by traditional correlation and mutual information methods. We also analyze data from individual lymphoblastoid cells and show that desirable properties of the RA method extend to single-cell RNA-seq.
CONCLUSION: We show that our ratiometric method identifies biologically significant relationships that are often missed or low-ranked by conventional association-based methods when applied to a relatively homogenous dataset. The results open new questions about the regulatory mechanisms that produce strong RA relationships. RA is scalable and potentially well suited for the analysis of thousands of bulk-RNA or single-cell transcriptomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25411051      PMCID: PMC4289233          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1471-2105            Impact factor:   3.169


  28 in total

1.  Correlation in restricted ranges of data.

Authors:  J Martin Bland; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-03-11

2.  Equitability, mutual information, and the maximal information coefficient.

Authors:  Justin B Kinney; Gurinder S Atwal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Detecting novel associations in large data sets.

Authors:  David N Reshef; Yakir A Reshef; Hilary K Finucane; Sharon R Grossman; Gilean McVean; Peter J Turnbaugh; Eric S Lander; Michael Mitzenmacher; Pardis C Sabeti
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  SUMOylation of hnRNP-K is required for p53-mediated cell-cycle arrest in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  Seong Won Lee; Moon Hee Lee; Jong Ho Park; Sung Hwan Kang; Hee Min Yoo; Seung Hyun Ka; Young Mi Oh; Young Joo Jeon; Chin Ha Chung
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  From single-cell to cell-pool transcriptomes: stochasticity in gene expression and RNA splicing.

Authors:  Georgi K Marinov; Brian A Williams; Ken McCue; Gary P Schroth; Jason Gertz; Richard M Myers; Barbara J Wold
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Streaming fragment assignment for real-time analysis of sequencing experiments.

Authors:  Adam Roberts; Lior Pachter
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes.

Authors:  Goncalo R Abecasis; Adam Auton; Lisa D Brooks; Mark A DePristo; Richard M Durbin; Robert E Handsaker; Hyun Min Kang; Gabor T Marth; Gil A McVean
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Comparison of co-expression measures: mutual information, correlation, and model based indices.

Authors:  Lin Song; Peter Langfelder; Steve Horvath
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Abnormal expression of the pre-mRNA splicing regulators SRSF1, SRSF2, SRPK1 and SRPK2 in non small cell lung carcinoma.

Authors:  Stephanie Gout; Elisabeth Brambilla; Asma Boudria; Romain Drissi; Sylvie Lantuejoul; Sylvie Gazzeri; Beatrice Eymin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  IntPath--an integrated pathway gene relationship database for model organisms and important pathogens.

Authors:  Hufeng Zhou; Jingjing Jin; Haojun Zhang; Bo Yi; Michal Wozniak; Limsoon Wong
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2012-12-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  Diverse Non-genetic, Allele-Specific Expression Effects Shape Genetic Architecture at the Cellular Level in the Mammalian Brain.

Authors:  Wei-Chao Huang; Elliott Ferris; Tong Cheng; Cornelia Stacher Hörndli; Kelly Gleason; Carol Tamminga; Janice D Wagner; Kenneth M Boucher; Jan L Christian; Christopher Gregg
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Exploiting single-cell expression to characterize co-expression replicability.

Authors:  Megan Crow; Anirban Paul; Sara Ballouz; Z Josh Huang; Jesse Gillis
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 13.583

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.