Literature DB >> 25410885

Impact of biochemical failure classification on clinical outcome: a secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9202 and 9413.

Daniel A Hamstra1, Kyounghwa Bae, Gerald Hanks, Chen Hu, William U Shipley, Charlie C Pan, Mack Roach, Colleen A Lawton, Howard M Sandler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biochemical failure (BF) after radiation therapy is defined on the basis of a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (A1 failure) or any event that prompts the initiation of salvage androgen-deprivation therapy without PSA failure (A2). It was hypothesized that A2 failure may have a different prognosis.
METHODS: Data for 2799 eligible patients from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9202 and RTOG 9413 were analyzed. BF was defined according to the 1997 American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition as A1 for PSA failure or as A2 for the start of salvage hormone therapy before 3 consecutive PSA rises.
RESULTS: Rates of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.0; P < .0001) and distant metastasis (DM; HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0; P < .0001) were greater with A2 failure. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 88.2% and 74.6% for A1 and A2, respectively (P < .0001), and the DM rates were 15.7% and 29.0%, respectively (P < .0001). The DM rate was greater at 5 years for A2 patients with DM as the first sign of failure versus patients with other A2 failures (87.3% vs 11.7%, P < .001), and this also correlated with worse OS at 5 years: 81.1% for A2 failure without DM and 52.8% with DM (P < .001). After the removal of patients with DM, the difference between A1 and A2 BF persisted for OS (P = .002) but not for DM (P = .16)
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that patients with rising PSA levels alone have less risk than those with A2 failures; although DM was the largest contributor of adverse risk to A2 failure, it did not account for all excess risk in A2 failure.
© 2014 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  prostate-specific antigen; prostate-specific antigen failure; radiotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25410885      PMCID: PMC4657945          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  20 in total

1.  Interval to biochemical failure as a biomarker for cause-specific and overall survival after dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nirav S Kapadia; Karin Olson; Howard M Sandler; Felix Y Feng; Daniel A Hamstra
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Time to Nadir PSA: Of Popes and PSA--The Immortality Bias.

Authors:  Skyler B Johnson; William C Jackson; Jure Murgic; Felix Y Feng; Daniel A Hamstra
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Consensus statement: guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Rep       Date:  1966-03

5.  Validating the interval to biochemical failure for the identification of potentially lethal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mark K Buyyounouski; Tom Pickles; Larry L Kestin; Roger Allison; Scott G Williams
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Predicting the risk of lymph node involvement using the pre-treatment prostate specific antigen and Gleason score in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Roach; C Marquez; H S Yuo; P Narayan; L Coleman; U O Nseyo; Z Navvab; P R Carroll
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  [Nadir PSA and kinetics of PSA decline between the 3rd and 6th month after external beam radiotherapy for T1 T2 Nx M0 localized prostate cancer: value of the prediction of the risk of biological progression].

Authors:  Christophe Almeras; Marc Zerbib; François Eschwege; Bernard Debré
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 0.915

8.  Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413.

Authors:  M Roach; M DeSilvio; C Lawton; V Uhl; M Machtay; M J Seider; M Rotman; C Jones; S O Asbell; R K Valicenti; S Han; C R Thomas; W S Shipley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Interval to biochemical failure predicts clinical outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated by combined-modality radiation therapy.

Authors:  Mark Shilkrut; P William McLaughlin; Gregory S Merrick; Jeffrey M Vainshtein; Felix Y Feng; Daniel A Hamstra
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Phase III trial of long-term adjuvant androgen deprivation after neoadjuvant hormonal cytoreduction and radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 92-02.

Authors:  Gerald E Hanks; Thomas F Pajak; Arthur Porter; David Grignon; Harmart Brereton; Varagur Venkatesan; Eric M Horwitz; Colleen Lawton; Seth A Rosenthal; Howard M Sandler; William U Shipley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  Gleason pattern 5 is associated with an increased risk for metastasis following androgen deprivation therapy and radiation: An analysis of RTOG 9202 and 9902.

Authors:  Daniel A Hamstra; Stephanie L Pugh; Herbert Lepor; Seth A Rosenthal; Kenneth J Pienta; Leonard Gomella; Christopher Peters; David Paul D'Souza; Kenneth L Zeitzer; Christopher U Jones; William A Hall; Eric Horwitz; Thomas M Pisansky; Luis Souhami; Alan C Hartford; Michael Dominello; Felix Feng; Howard M Sandler
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 6.280

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.