Literature DB >> 25410698

Inadequate performance measures affecting practices, organizations and outcomes of Ontario's family health teams.

Rachelle Ashcroft1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emphasis on quantity as the main performance measure may be posing challenges for Family Health Team (FHT) practices and organizational structures. This study asked: What healthcare practices and organizational structures are encouraged by the FHT model?
METHODS: An exploratory qualitative design guided by discourse analysis was used. This paper presents findings from in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted with seven policy informants and 29 FHT leaders.
RESULTS: Participants report that performance measures value quantity and are not inclusive of the broad scope of attributes that comprise primary healthcare. Performance measures do not appear to be accurately capturing the demand for healthcare services, or the actual amount of services being provided by FHTs. RESULTS suggest that unintended consequences of performance measures may be posing challenges to access and health outcomes.
CONCLUSION: It is recommended that performance measures be developed and used to measure, support and encourage FHTs to achieve the goals of PHC.
Copyright © 2014 Longwoods Publishing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25410698      PMCID: PMC4253898     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  7 in total

Review 1.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.

Authors:  S M Campbell; J Braspenning; A Hutchinson; M N Marshall
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

2.  Gauging to gain: primary care performance measurement.

Authors:  Sharon Johnston; Simone Dahrouge; William Hogg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Part 1--unravelling primary health care conceptual predicaments through the lenses of complexity and political economy: a position paper for progressive transformation.

Authors:  Margot Félix-Bortolotti
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  The political economy of U.S. primary care.

Authors:  Lewis G Sandy; Thomas Bodenheimer; L Gregory Pawlson; Barbara Starfield
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 5.  Evaluating the quality of medical care.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1966-07

6.  Unintended consequences of implementing a national performance measurement system into local practice.

Authors:  Adam A Powell; Katie M White; Melissa R Partin; Krysten Halek; Jon B Christianson; Brian Neil; Sylvia J Hysong; Edwin J Zarling; Hanna E Bloomfield
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Operational definitions of attributes of primary health care: consensus among Canadian experts.

Authors:  Jeannie Haggerty; Fred Burge; Jean-Frédéric Lévesque; David Gass; Raynald Pineault; Marie-Dominique Beaulieu; Darcy Santor
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Processes that influence the evolution of family health teams.

Authors:  Judith Belle Brown; Bridget L Ryan
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  A Qualitative Study on Incentives and Disincentives for Care of Common Mental Disorders in Ontario Family Health Teams.

Authors:  Rachelle Ashcroft; Jose Silveira; Kwame Mckenzie
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-08

3.  Measuring the performance of interprofessional primary health care teams: understanding the teams perspective.

Authors:  Catherine Donnelly; Rachelle Ashcroft; Amanda Mofina; Nicole Bobbette; Carol Mulder
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 1.458

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.