BACKGROUND: No individualised standardised measure of staff support for mental health recovery exists. AIMS: To develop and evaluate a measure of staff support for recovery. DEVELOPMENT: initial draft of measure based on systematic review of recovery processes; consultation (n = 61); and piloting (n = 20). Psychometric evaluation: three rounds of data collection from mental health service users (n = 92). RESULTS: INSPIRE has two sub-scales. The 20-item Support sub-scale has convergent validity (0.60) and adequate sensitivity to change. Exploratory factor analysis (variance 71.4-85.1 %, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.65-0.78) and internal consistency (range 0.82-0.85) indicate each recovery domain is adequately assessed. The 7-item Relationship sub-scale has convergent validity 0.69, test-retest reliability 0.75, internal consistency 0.89, a one-factor solution (variance 70.5 %, KMO 0.84) and adequate sensitivity to change. A 5-item Brief INSPIRE was also evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: INSPIRE and Brief INSPIRE demonstrate adequate psychometric properties, and can be recommended for research and clinical use.
BACKGROUND: No individualised standardised measure of staff support for mental health recovery exists. AIMS: To develop and evaluate a measure of staff support for recovery. DEVELOPMENT: initial draft of measure based on systematic review of recovery processes; consultation (n = 61); and piloting (n = 20). Psychometric evaluation: three rounds of data collection from mental health service users (n = 92). RESULTS: INSPIRE has two sub-scales. The 20-item Support sub-scale has convergent validity (0.60) and adequate sensitivity to change. Exploratory factor analysis (variance 71.4-85.1 %, Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin 0.65-0.78) and internal consistency (range 0.82-0.85) indicate each recovery domain is adequately assessed. The 7-item Relationship sub-scale has convergent validity 0.69, test-retest reliability 0.75, internal consistency 0.89, a one-factor solution (variance 70.5 %, KMO 0.84) and adequate sensitivity to change. A 5-item Brief INSPIRE was also evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: INSPIRE and Brief INSPIRE demonstrate adequate psychometric properties, and can be recommended for research and clinical use.
Authors: Clair Le Boutillier; Mary Leamy; Victoria J Bird; Larry Davidson; Julie Williams; Mike Slade Journal: Psychiatr Serv Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 3.084
Authors: J Williams; M Leamy; V Bird; C Harding; J Larsen; C Le Boutillier; L Oades; M Slade Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2012-02-10 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Mike J Crawford; Dan Robotham; Lavanya Thana; Sue Patterson; Tim Weaver; Rosemary Barber; Til Wykes; Diana Rose Journal: J Ment Health Date: 2011-08
Authors: Victoria Bird; Mary Leamy; Jerry Tew; Clair Le Boutillier; Julie Williams; Mike Slade Journal: Aust N Z J Psychiatry Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 5.744
Authors: Joy Llewellyn-Beardsley; Stefan Rennick-Egglestone; Simon Bradstreet; Larry Davidson; Donna Franklin; Ada Hui; Rose McGranahan; Kate Morgan; Kristian Pollock; Amy Ramsay; Roger Smith; Graham Thornicroft; Mike Slade Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2019-10-25 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Francesca Pesola; Julie Williams; Victoria Bird; Marion Freidl; Clair Le Boutillier; Mary Leamy; Rob Macpherson; Mike Slade Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Simon Coulombe; Stephanie Radziszewski; Sophie Meunier; Hélène Provencher; Catherine Hudon; Pasquale Roberge; Martin D Provencher; Janie Houle Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2016-04-26
Authors: M Leamy; E Clarke; C Le Boutillier; V Bird; R Choudhury; R MacPherson; F Pesola; K Sabas; J Williams; P Williams; M Slade Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 9.319