Literature DB >> 25409713

Design evolution in total knee replacement: which is the future?

A Causero1, P Di Benedetto, A Beltrame, R Gisonni, V Cainero, M Pagano.   

Abstract

Total knee replacement (TKR) procedures have evolved in the last 40 years to guarantee improvements implants life and an excellent joint function. The goals for the future evolutions are make easier prosthesis implantation and promote precision. The demand for TKR will rise for the life length increase and for the risk factors impact increase. Design evolution in total knee replacement has to satisfy these new necessities: anatomic congruence, range of motion, less material wear and better resistance to the weight bearing and to the stresses. This paper analyzes design evolution, materials development and future purposes in total knee arthroplasty. At the beginning, TKR history is treated; then we compare several prosthetic designs developed during years. At last the paper speak about recent innovations, like CAD (computer aided design) for example, born to reach the most important goal in the future: better TKR design, is the one that better imitate natural knee characteristics, and that is able to integrate it-self with capsule-ligaments and muscle-tendons patient structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25409713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomed        ISSN: 0392-4203


  7 in total

1.  Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases.

Authors:  Usman Nazir Gill; Nasir Ahmed; Syed Shahid Noor; Iftikhar Ahmed Memon; Zulfiqar Ali Memon
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Medial congruent polyethylene design show different tibiofemoral kinematics and enhanced congruency compared to a standard symmetrical cruciate retaining design for total knee arthroplasty-an in vivo randomized controlled study of gait using dynamic radiostereometry.

Authors:  Emil Toft Petersen; Søren Rytter; Daan Koppens; Jesper Dalsgaard; Torben Bæk Hansen; Michael Skipper Andersen; Maiken Stilling
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Evaluation of the application value of a three-dimensional digital model of the knee in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ajimu Keremu; Nuersimanguli Mijiti; Sirejiding Mijiti; Aikebaier Tuxun; Abulikemu Abudurexiti
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Comparative study on mid- and long-term clinical effects of medial pivot prosthesis and posterior-stabilized prosthesis after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Weipeng Shi; Yaping Jiang; Changyao Wang; Haining Zhang; Yingzhen Wang; Tao Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Decreased Survival of Medial Pivot Designs Compared with Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA Without Patellar Resurfacing.

Authors:  Frank-David Øhrn; Øystein Gøthesen; Stein Håkon Låstad Lygre; Yi Peng; Øystein Bjerkestrand Lian; Peter L Lewis; Ove Furnes; Stephan M Röhrl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

6.  Prediction of wear performance in femoral and tibial conformity in patient-specific cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong-Gon Koh; Kyoung-Mi Park; Hwa-Yong Lee; Joon-Hee Park; Kyoung-Tak Kang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Early Functional Outcomes After Evolutionary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Is New Always Better?

Authors:  Sunil K Panchani; Hiren M Divecha; Rebecca Lafferty; George Pavlou; Jez Oakley; Debbie Shaw; Amol Chitre; Henry Wynn Jones; Videsh Raut; Robert Smith; Anil Gambhir; Tim Board
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2021-07-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.