Literature DB >> 25409371

Early versus on-demand nasoenteric tube feeding in acute pancreatitis.

Olaf J Bakker1, Sandra van Brunschot, Hjalmar C van Santvoort, Marc G Besselink, Thomas L Bollen, Marja A Boermeester, Cornelis H Dejong, Harry van Goor, Koop Bosscha, Usama Ahmed Ali, Stefan Bouwense, Wilhelmina M van Grevenstein, Joos Heisterkamp, Alexander P Houdijk, Jeroen M Jansen, Thom M Karsten, Eric R Manusama, Vincent B Nieuwenhuijs, Alexander F Schaapherder, George P van der Schelling, Matthijs P Schwartz, B W Marcel Spanier, Adriaan Tan, Juda Vecht, Bas L Weusten, Ben J Witteman, Louis M Akkermans, Marco J Bruno, Marcel G Dijkgraaf, Bert van Ramshorst, Hein G Gooszen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early enteral feeding through a nasoenteric feeding tube is often used in patients with severe acute pancreatitis to prevent gut-derived infections, but evidence to support this strategy is limited. We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial comparing early nasoenteric tube feeding with an oral diet at 72 hours after presentation to the emergency department in patients with acute pancreatitis.
METHODS: We enrolled patients with acute pancreatitis who were at high risk for complications on the basis of an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 8 or higher (on a scale of 0 to 71, with higher scores indicating more severe disease), an Imrie or modified Glasgow score of 3 or higher (on a scale of 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating more severe disease), or a serum C-reactive protein level of more than 150 mg per liter. Patients were randomly assigned to nasoenteric tube feeding within 24 hours after randomization (early group) or to an oral diet initiated 72 hours after presentation (on-demand group), with tube feeding provided if the oral diet was not tolerated. The primary end point was a composite of major infection (infected pancreatic necrosis, bacteremia, or pneumonia) or death during 6 months of follow-up.
RESULTS: A total of 208 patients were enrolled at 19 Dutch hospitals. The primary end point occurred in 30 of 101 patients (30%) in the early group and in 28 of 104 (27%) in the on-demand group (risk ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.44; P=0.76). There were no significant differences between the early group and the on-demand group in the rate of major infection (25% and 26%, respectively; P=0.87) or death (11% and 7%, respectively; P=0.33). In the on-demand group, 72 patients (69%) tolerated an oral diet and did not require tube feeding.
CONCLUSIONS: This trial did not show the superiority of early nasoenteric tube feeding, as compared with an oral diet after 72 hours, in reducing the rate of infection or death in patients with acute pancreatitis at high risk for complications. (Funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development and others; PYTHON Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN18170985.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25409371     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  51 in total

1.  Timing of oral refeeding in acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Masayasu Horibe; Toshihiro Nishizawa; Hidekazu Suzuki; Kazuhiro Minami; Naohisa Yahagi; Eisuke Iwasaki; Takanori Kanai
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Management of Acute Pancreatitis in the Early Stage.

Authors:  Narcis Octavian Zarnescu; Sorin Traian Barbu; Eugenia Claudia Zarnescu Vasiliu; Radu Costea; Stefan Neagu
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2015-09

Review 3.  Management of acute pancreatitis in the first 72 hours.

Authors:  Theodore W James; Seth D Crockett
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.287

4.  Updates in Pediatric Pancreatology: Proceedings of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Frontiers in Pediatric Pancreatology Symposium.

Authors:  Amit S Grover; Alvin J Freeman; Maisam Abu-El-Haija; John F Eisses; Timothy B Gardner; Quin Y Liu; Mark E Lowe; Jaimie D Nathan; Tonya M Palermo; Vikesh K Singh; Andrew T Trout; Aliye Uc; Sohail Z Husain; Veronique D Morinville
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 5.  Management of the patient with acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  P MacGoey; E J Dickson; K Puxty
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2019-05-24

6.  A 23-year-old Man with Leptospirosis and Acute Abdominal Pain.

Authors:  Momal Mazhar; Janet J Kao; Dennis Thomas Bolger
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2016-10

7.  Quality of Care Indicators in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Gyanprakash Ketwaroo; Robert Jay Sealock; Steven Freedman; Phil A Hart; Mohamed Othman; Wahid Wassef; Peter Banks; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Timothy Gardner; Dhiraj Yadav; Sunil Sheth; Fasiha Kanwal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  Practice Patterns and Utilization of Tube Feedings in Acute Pancreatitis Patients at a Large US Referral Center.

Authors:  Jorge D Machicado; Amir Gougol; Pedram Paragomi; Stephen J OʼKeefe; Kenneth Lee; Adam Slivka; David C Whitcomb; Dhiraj Yadav; Georgios I Papachristou
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.327

9.  The Pancreatitis Activity Scoring System predicts clinical outcomes in acute pancreatitis: findings from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  James Buxbaum; Michael Quezada; Bradford Chong; Nikhil Gupta; Chung Yao Yu; Christianne Lane; Ben Da; Kenneth Leung; Ira Shulman; Stephen Pandol; Bechien Wu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  New Advances in the Treatment of Acute Pancreatitis.

Authors:  Mahya Faghih; Christopher Fan; Vikesh K Singh
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.