Literature DB >> 25409357

Community-onset Staphylococcus aureus Surveillance Programme annual report, 2012.

Geoffrey W Coombs1, Denise A Daly2, Julie C Pearson1, Graeme R Nimmo3, Peter J Collignon4, Mary-Louise McLaws5, James O Robinson1, John D Turnidge6.   

Abstract

In 2012, the Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR) conducted a community-onset period-prevalence survey of clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolated from hospital outpatients and general practice patients including nursing homes, long term care facilities and hospice patients. Day surgery and dialysis patients were excluded. Twenty-nine medical microbiology laboratories from all state and mainland territories participated. Isolates were tested by Vitek2® (AST-P612 card). Results were compared with previous AGAR community surveys. Nationally, the proportion of S. aureus that were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) increased significantly from 11.5% in 2000 to 17.9% in 2012 (P<0.0001). Resistance to the non-ß-lactam antimicrobials varied between regions. No resistance was detected to vancomycin, teicoplanin or linezolid. Resistance in methicillin susceptible S. aureus was rare apart from erythromycin (12.8%) and was absent for vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid and daptomycin. The proportion of S. aureus characterised as health care-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) was 5.1%. Three HA-MRSA clones were characterised, with 72.9% and 26.4% of HA-MRSA classified as ST22-IV [2B] (EMRSA-15) and ST239-III [3A] (Aus-2/3 EMRSA) respectively. Multi-clonal community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) accounted for 12.5% of all S. aureus. Regional variation in resistance in MRSA was primarily due to the differential distribution of the 2 major HA-MRSA clones; ST239-III [3A] (Aus-2/3 EMRSA), which is resistant to multiple non-ß-lactam antimicrobials, and ST22-IV [2B] (EMRSA-15), which is resistant to ciprofloxacin and typically erythromycin. Although the majority of CA-MRSA were non-multi-resistant, a significant expansion of Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) positive CA-MRSA clones has occurred nationally. The mean age of patients (31.7 years, 95% CI 28.9-34.5) with a PVL positive CA-MRSA infection was significantly lower (P<0.0001), than the mean age of patients with a PVL negative CA-MRSA infection (55.7 years, 95% CI 50.7-60.6). This shift in the molecular epidemiology of MRSA clones in the Australian community will potentially increase the number of young Australians with skin and soft tissue infections requiring hospitalisation. copyright@health.gov.au

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25409357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Dis Intell Q Rep        ISSN: 1447-4514


  14 in total

1.  What is behind the epidemiological difference between community-acquired and health-care associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?

Authors:  Agnes M S Figueiredo
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 5.882

Review 2.  Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns.

Authors:  Deborah A Williamson; Glen P Carter; Benjamin P Howden
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Characterization of compound A, a novel lincomycin derivative active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Yoko Hirai; Kazunori Maebashi; Keiko Yamada; Yoshinari Wakiyama; Ko Kumura; Eijiro Umemura; Keiichi Ajito
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Evolution of a 72-Kilobase Cointegrant, Conjugative Multiresistance Plasmid in Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from the Early 1990s.

Authors:  Karina Yui Eto; Neville Firth; Amy M Davis; Stephen M Kwong; Marcelina Krysiak; Yung Thin Lee; Frances G O'Brien; Warren B Grubb; Geoffrey W Coombs; Charles S Bond; Joshua P Ramsay
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  The rise of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus: now the dominant cause of skin and soft tissue infection in Central Australia.

Authors:  E Macmorran; S Harch; E Athan; S Lane; S Tong; L Crawford; S Krishnaswamy; S Hewagama
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  High burden of complicated skin and soft tissue infections in the Indigenous population of Central Australia due to dominant Panton Valentine leucocidin clones ST93-MRSA and CC121-MSSA.

Authors:  Susan A J Harch; Eleanor MacMorran; Steven Y C Tong; Deborah C Holt; Judith Wilson; Eugene Athan; Saliya Hewagama
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.090

7.  Whole genome sequencing to investigate a putative outbreak of the virulent community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST93 clone in a remote Indigenous community.

Authors:  Ella M Meumann; Patiyan Andersson; Fiona Yeaman; Sarah Oldfield; Rachael Lilliebridge; Stephen D Bentley; Vicki Krause; Miles Beaman; Bart J Currie; Deborah C Holt; Philip M Giffard; Steven Y C Tong
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2016-12-12

8.  A Prescription for Resistance: Management of Staphylococcal Skin Abscesses by General Practitioners in Australia.

Authors:  Christine Parrott; Gillian Wood; Ekaterina Bogatyreva; Geoffrey W Coombs; Paul D R Johnson; Catherine M Bennett
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Molecular Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Australian Veterinarians.

Authors:  Mitchell D Groves; Bethany Crouch; Geoffrey W Coombs; David Jordan; Stanley Pang; Mary D Barton; Phil Giffard; Sam Abraham; Darren J Trott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Retrospective Case-Series of Children With Bone and Joint Infection From Northern Australia.

Authors:  Anna Brischetto; Grace Leung; Catherine S Marshall; Asha C Bowen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.