Literature DB >> 25409158

Use of a picosecond pulse duration laser with specialized optic for treatment of facial acne scarring.

Jeremy A Brauer1, Viktoryia Kazlouskaya2, Hamad Alabdulrazzaq3, Yoon Soo Bae3, Leonard J Bernstein4, Robert Anolik5, Patricia A Heller2, Roy G Geronemus1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Fractional laser technology is routinely used in the treatment of acne scarring, with thermal injury resulting in collagen synthesis and remodeling. Use of a picosecond pulse duration with a diffractive lens array may be a new technologic advancement in the treatment of acne scarring.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of a 755-nm alexandrite picosecond pulse duration laser with diffractive lens array for the treatment of facial acne scarring. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This single-center, prospective study performed in a private practice with a dedicated research department included patients with clinically diagnosed scarring secondary to inflammatory or cystic acne.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients received 6 treatments with a 755-nm picosecond laser with a spot size of 6 mm, fluence of 0.71 J/cm2, repetition rate of 5 Hz, and pulse width of 750 picoseconds in combination with a diffractive lens array, allowing for greater surface area and pattern density per pulse. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The pain and satisfaction scores for overall appearance and texture were recorded. Masked assessment of clinical photographs and analysis of 3-dimensional volumetric data were performed. Biopsy specimens were obtained for independent histologic evaluation by 2 investigators at baseline and at 3 months after last treatment.
RESULTS: Fifteen women and 5 men (mean age, 44 years; age range, 27-61 years) with Fitzpatrick skin types I through V and facial acne scarring were enrolled. The mean pain score was 2.83 of 10. Patients were satisfied to extremely satisfied with improvement in appearance and texture at their final treatment and follow-up visits. The masked assessment scores of 17 patients were 1.5 of 3 and 1.4 of 3 at 1 and 3 months, respectively (a score of 0 indicates 0%-25% improvement and a score of 3 indicates >75% improvement). A 3-dimensional analysis revealed a mean 24.3% improvement in scar volume, maintained at 1 (24.0%) and 3 (27.2%) months after treatment. Histologic analysis revealed elongation and increased density of elastic fibers, with an increase in dermal collagen and mucin. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Treatment of facial acne scars with a diffractive lens array and 755-nm picosecond laser produced improvement in appearance and texture at 3 months after the last treatment, with objective findings similar to those published for a series of fractional ablative laser treatments. Histologic findings suggest that improvement in scarring from this treatment goes beyond remodeling of collagen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25409158     DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Dermatol        ISSN: 2168-6068            Impact factor:   10.282


  17 in total

1.  Critical Considerations on Optimizing Topical Corticosteroid Therapy.

Authors:  W Philip Werschler; Richard S Herdener; Victor E Ross; Edward Zimmerman
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2015-08

2.  Applications of picosecond lasers beyond tattoos: pigment reduction and tissue remodeling.

Authors:  Emily Forbat; Faisal R Ali; Firas Al-Niaimi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Comparison of fractional neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond laser and fractional 1550-nm erbium fiber laser in facial acne scar treatment.

Authors:  Pamela Chayavichitsilp; Preeyachat Limtong; Korn Triyangkulsri; Nathathai Pratumchart
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Picosecond 532-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet laser-a novel and promising modality for the treatment of café-au-lait macules.

Authors:  Ofir Artzi; Joseph N Mehrabi; Amir Koren; Roni Niv; Moshe Lapidoth; Assi Levi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Interaction of skin with fractional picosecond laser in Asian patients.

Authors:  Hye-Jin Ahn; Dong Hye Suh; In-Hye Kang; Sang Jun Lee; Min Kyung Shin; Kye Yong Song
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2021-11

6.  Histology changes of in vivo human skin after treatment with fractional 1064 nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser in different energy settings.

Authors:  Yin-Shuo Chang; Ting-Hua Yang; Chien-Nien Li
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 7.  Acne Scarring-Pathogenesis, Evaluation, and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Deirdre Connolly; Ha Linh Vu; Kavita Mariwalla; Nazanin Saedi
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2017-09-01

8.  Picosecond Laser-Induced Photothermal Skin Damage Evaluation by Computational Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Y Shimojo; T Nishimura; H Hazama; N Ito; K Awazu
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2020-07-17

9.  A novel dual-wavelength, Nd:YAG, picosecond-domain laser safely and effectively removes multicolor tattoos.

Authors:  Eric F Bernstein; Kevin T Schomacker; Lisa D Basilavecchio; Jessica M Plugis; Jayant D Bhawalkar
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Safety and efficacy of a novel diffractive lens array using a picosecond 755 nm alexandrite laser for treatment of wrinkles.

Authors:  Robert A Weiss; David H McDaniel; Margaret A Weiss; Anne Marie Mahoney; Karen L Beasley; Christian R Halvorson
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 4.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.