Helen J Burgess1, James K Wyatt2, Margaret Park2, Louis F Fogg3. 1. Biological Rhythms Research Laboratory, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL. 2. Sleep Disorders Service and Research Center, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL. 3. College of Nursing, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: There is a need for the accurate assessment of circadian phase outside of the clinic/laboratory, particularly with the gold standard dim light melatonin onset (DLMO). We tested a novel kit designed to assist in saliva sampling at home for later determination of the DLMO. The home kit includes objective measures of compliance to the requirements for dim light and half-hourly saliva sampling. DESIGN: Participants were randomized to one of two 10-day protocols. Each protocol consisted of two back-to-back home and laboratory phase assessments in counterbalanced order, separated by a 5-day break. SETTING: Laboratory or participants' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five healthy adults, age 21-62 y. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Most participants received at least one 30-sec epoch of light > 50 lux during the home phase assessments (average light intensity 4.5 lux), but on average for < 9 min of the required 8.5 h. Most participants collected every saliva sample within 5 min of the scheduled time. Ninety-two percent of home DLMOs were not affected by light > 50 lux or sampling errors. There was no significant difference between the home and laboratory DLMOs (P > 0.05); on average the home DLMOs occurred 9.6 min before the laboratory DLMOs. The home DLMOs were highly correlated with the laboratory DLMOs (r = 0.91, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Participants were reasonably compliant to the home phase assessment procedures. The good agreement between the home and laboratory dim light melatonin onsets (DLMOs) demonstrates that including objective measures of light exposure and sample timing during home saliva sampling can lead to accurate home DLMOs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Circadian Phase Assessments at Home, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01487252, NCT01487252.
RCT Entities:
STUDY OBJECTIVES: There is a need for the accurate assessment of circadian phase outside of the clinic/laboratory, particularly with the gold standard dim light melatonin onset (DLMO). We tested a novel kit designed to assist in saliva sampling at home for later determination of the DLMO. The home kit includes objective measures of compliance to the requirements for dim light and half-hourly saliva sampling. DESIGN:Participants were randomized to one of two 10-day protocols. Each protocol consisted of two back-to-back home and laboratory phase assessments in counterbalanced order, separated by a 5-day break. SETTING: Laboratory or participants' homes. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-five healthy adults, age 21-62 y. INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Most participants received at least one 30-sec epoch of light > 50 lux during the home phase assessments (average light intensity 4.5 lux), but on average for < 9 min of the required 8.5 h. Most participants collected every saliva sample within 5 min of the scheduled time. Ninety-two percent of home DLMOs were not affected by light > 50 lux or sampling errors. There was no significant difference between the home and laboratory DLMOs (P > 0.05); on average the home DLMOs occurred 9.6 min before the laboratory DLMOs. The home DLMOs were highly correlated with the laboratory DLMOs (r = 0.91, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Participants were reasonably compliant to the home phase assessment procedures. The good agreement between the home and laboratory dim light melatonin onsets (DLMOs) demonstrates that including objective measures of light exposure and sample timing during home saliva sampling can lead to accurate home DLMOs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Circadian Phase Assessments at Home, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01487252, NCT01487252.
Authors: Richard P Allen; Daniel L Picchietti; Diego Garcia-Borreguero; William G Ondo; Arthur S Walters; John W Winkelman; Marco Zucconi; Raffaele Ferri; Claudia Trenkwalder; Hochang B Lee Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Janet M Mullington; Sabra M Abbott; Judith E Carroll; Christopher J Davis; Derk-Jan Dijk; David F Dinges; Philip R Gehrman; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; David Gozal; Monika Haack; Diane C Lim; Madalina Macrea; Allan I Pack; David T Plante; Jennifer A Teske; Phyllis C Zee Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Lauren A Watson; Elise M McGlashan; Ihaia T Hosken; Clare Anderson; Andrew J K Phillips; Sean W Cain Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Christopher M Depner; Philip C Cheng; Jaime K Devine; Seema Khosla; Massimiliano de Zambotti; Rébecca Robillard; Andrew Vakulin; Sean P A Drummond Journal: Sleep Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Jason C Ong; Hannah L Taylor; Margaret Park; Helen J Burgess; Rina S Fox; Sarah Snyder; Jeanetta C Rains; Colin A Espie; James K Wyatt Journal: Headache Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 5.887