Literature DB >> 25408611

A taxonomic review on the species of Tetraserica Ahrens, 2004, of China (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sericini).

Wan-Gang Liu1, Silvia Fabrizi2, Ming Bai3, Xing-Ke Yang3, Dirk Ahrens2.   

Abstract

A review on the Chinese species of Tetraserica Ahrens, 2004, is presented. The lectotype of Tetrasericatonkinensis (Moser, 1908), comb. n. is designated. Twenty-nine new Tetraserica species are described from China and adjacent regions: Tetrasericaanhuaensis sp. n., Tetrasericachangjiangensis sp. n., Tetrasericachangshouensis sp. n., Tetrasericadamaidiensis sp. n., Tetrasericadaqingshanica sp. n., Tetrasericafikaceki sp. n., Tetrasericagraciliforceps sp. n., Tetrasericajinghongensis sp. n., Tetrasericaleishanica sp. n., Tetrasericaliangheensis sp. n., Tetrasericalinaoshanica sp. n., Tetrasericalongipenis sp. n., Tetrasericalongzhouensis sp. n., Tetrasericamaoershanensis sp. n., Tetrasericamengeana sp. n., Tetrasericamenglongensis sp. n., Tetrasericapingjiangensis sp. n., Tetrasericaruiliana sp. n., Tetrasericaruiliensis sp. n., Tetrasericasculptilis sp. n., Tetrasericashangsiensis sp. n., Tetrasericashunbiensis sp. n., Tetrasericasigulianshanica sp. n., Tetrasericatianchiensis sp. n., Tetrasericawandingensis sp. n., Tetrasericawangtongensis sp. n., Tetrasericaxichouensis sp. n., Tetrasericayaoanica sp. n., Tetrasericayaoquensis sp. n. A key to the Chinese Tetraserica species is given, species distribution as well as the habitus and male genitalia of all species are illustrated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beetles; China; Tetraserica; chafers; new species

Year:  2014        PMID: 25408611      PMCID: PMC4233395          DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.448.8429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zookeys        ISSN: 1313-2970            Impact factor:   1.546


Introduction

The genus was established by Ahrens (2004). The genus included so far 8 nominal species from Indian subcontinent and Myanmar. Other species are known or described from India, Indochina, Philippines, Sumatra and Borneo, but they are not yet formally transferred to . Based on the results of this study, the genus is for the first time recorded for China. Recent molecular work confirmed the monophyly of (Ahrens and Vogler 2008; Liu et al., unpublished data). In this study, we examined the material collected in China mainland and deposited in Chinese institutional collections as well as various European and American collections. We found twenty-nine new taxa, which are described herein. Additionally, non-Chinese records are added to the species recorded from China, while the taxa occurring exclusively out of China are not revised herein. A key to the Chinese species is given, species distribution, as well as habitus and male genitalia, are illustrated.

Material and methods

The terminology and methods used for measurements, specimen dissection and genital preparation follow Ahrens (2004). Data from specimens examined are cited in the text with original label contents given in quotation marks, multiple labels are separated by a “/”. Male genitalia were glued to a small pointed card attached to the specimen. Descriptions and illustrations of new taxa are based on the holotype or lectotype specimen, while the variation of other specimens is given separately. All descriptions and measurements were made under an Olympus SZX 12 microscope, and all genital and habitus illustrations were made with a digital camera (AxioCam HRc) attached to a stereo microscope (Zeiss Stereo Discovery V20) and Axio Version 4.8 software. The distribution maps were generated using Q-GIS 2.0.1 and Inscape software. Type specimens and other examined material are deposited in the following institutions or collections: BPBM; Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu (Hawai), U.S.A. CAU; Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China CNAR; Collection A. Napolov, Riga, Latvia CPPB; Coll. Petr Pacholátko, Brno, Czech Republic HBUM; Museum of Hebei University, Baoding (Hebei Prov.), China IZAS; Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China MZUF; Museo Zoologico „La Specola”, Università di Firenze, Italy NHMW; Natural History Museum Vienna, Austria NME; Naturkundemuseum Erfurt, Germany NMPC; National Museum Prague (Natural History), Czech Republic NUYS; Northwest A & F University, Yangling (Shaanxi Prov.), China SYUG; Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou (Guangdong Prov.), China USNM; National Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C., U.S.A. ZFMK. Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum A. Koenig, Bonn, Germany

Taxonomy

Ahrens, 2004 Ahrens, 2004: 168 (type species by original designation:

Diagnosis.

Body moderately large to large (6–12 mm), mostly dark brown; ventral surface reddish brown; dorsal surface dull and glabrous. Labroclypeus subtrapezoidal, wider than long, widest at base, lateral margins moderately convex and convergent to strongly rounded anterior angles, anterior margin weakly sinuate medially, margins moderately reflexed; surface weakly convex, moderately shiny, finely and densely punctate; frontoclypeal suture indistinctly incised, flat and weakly curved medially; ocular canthus short and triangular, impunctate, with a single terminal seta. Frons dull, with sparse, fine punctures, with single erect setae beside each eye. Antenna yellowish, with 10 antennomeres; club composed of 4 antennomeres in male, straight, rarely longer than 1.5 times as the remaining antennomeres combined; club in female composed of 3 antennomeres, as long as the remaining antennomeres combined. Mentum elevated and slightly flattened anteriorly. Pronotum moderately wide and strongly convex, lateral margins evenly convex, more strongly narrowed anteriorly towards sharp and slightly produced anterior angles. Anterior margin of pronotum slightly convex, with fine complete marginal line. Posterior angles blunt or strongly rounded. Surface finely and densely punctate, except minute setae glabrous, lateral and lateral anterior margins sparsely setose. Hypomeron not carinate. Scutellum triangular, finely and densely punctate. Elytra oblong, widest just behind middle, striae distinctly impressed, finely and moderately densely punctate, intervals distinctly convex, with coarse and dense punctures concentrated along striae, with very minute setae in punctures; epipleural edge robust, ending at weakly curved and slightly blunt external apical angle of elytra, epipleura densely setose, apical border with a broad fringe of microtrichomes (100×). Ventral surface weakly shiny, finely and densely punctate, metasternum sparsely covered with fine, short, or very minute setae, metacoxa glabrous, with a few single setae laterally; abdominal sternites finely and densely punctuate, with a transverse row of coarse punctures, each bearing a robust seta. Mesosternum between mesocoxae as wide as mesofemur. Pygidium weakly convex and dull, densely punctate, without smooth midline, almost glabrous, but with a few longer setae along apical margin; pygidium without strong sexual dimorphism. Legs moderately wide; femora finely and sparsely punctate; metafemur wide and moderately shiny or dull, anterior margin acute, posterior margin smooth ventrally and only weakly widened in apical half, posterior margin smooth dorsally, with a few short setae basally. Metatibia moderately wide to wide and moderately long, widest at half of metatibial length, dorsal margin sharply carinate, with two groups of spines; lateral face finely and sparsely punctate; ventral edge finely serrated, with four robust equidistant setae, medial face smooth, apex interiorly near tarsal articulation with a shallow sinuation. Tarsomeres with fine, very dense setae ventrally on distal half, neither laterally nor dorsally carinate, dorsally smooth; metatarsomeres with a strongly serrated ridge ventrally and glabrous; first metatarsomere slightly shorter than two following tarsomeres combined, one third of its length longer than dorsal tibial spine. Protibia short, bidentate; anterior claws symmetrical, basal tooth of both claws bluntly truncate at apex. Aedoeagus. Phallobasis with a more or less long median ventral extension.

Remarks.

So far seven species from Himalaya and the type species from Myanmar have been formally assigned to (Ahrens 2004; Ahrens and Fabrizi 2009). Most other oriental species (so far grouped with ‘’) await taxonomic revision. differs from closely related genera Brenske, 1894, and Moser, 1922, by the lacking ventral carina of hypomeron. From it also differs by the lacking sexual dimorphism of the pygidium, from by the bidentate protibia. In contrast to the , species of are active at night and are attracted by light.

Distribution.

The genus is distributed almost in the entire Oriental region; we know described species so far assigned to “” from Philippines, Indochina, Sumatra, and Borneo (Ahrens 2004). Except in Meghalaya and Himalaya, the genus does not occur on Indian subcontinent south of the Ganges.

sp. n.

http://zoobank.org/74654444-A9CA-4349-8BD1-EE5C52AD9530

Type material examined.

Holotype: ♂ [China] “Mt. Daqingshan, Longzhou, Guangxi, 24.IV.1963, 600–700m, leg. Shi Yongshan” (IZAS). Paratype: 1 ♂ [China] “Mt. Daqingshan, Longzhou, Guangxi, 13.IV.1963, 360m, leg. Wang Shuyong” (ZFMK).

Description.

Body length: 9.2 mm, length of elytra: 7 mm, width: 5.5 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Antennal club 1.1 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Eyes small; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.53. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.63. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior PageBreakmargin with a blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.1; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 1A–C. Habitus: Fig. 1D.
Figure 1.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H Ahrens sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H Ahrens sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm. Female unknown.

Variation.

Body length: 9.2 mm, length of elytra: 7.0–7.3 mm, width: 5.5–5.9 mm. The new species differs from all other so far known species by the blunt tooth at the posterior margin of the metafemur.

Etymology.

The new species is named after the type locality, Mt. Daqingshan. http://zoobank.org/1DD74C0C-602F-4EFC-970E-8DE9A3A25400 Holotype: ♂ “China: Hubei; Dahongshan 1700m, Shuizhou VI-2003 leg. Ying et al.” (ZFMK). Paratypes. 1 ♂ [China] “Hekou, Southeast of Yunnan, 9.VI.1956, 1200m, leg. Panfilov” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Luxi, Yunnan, 22.V.1980, leg. Li Hongxing” (IZAS). Body length: 9.1 mm, length of elytra: 7.3 mm, width: 5.4 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.6. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.7. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin with a blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.2; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 1E–G. Habitus: Fig. 1H. Female unknown. Body length: 9.1–9.8 mm, length of elytra: 7.3–7.4 mm, width: 5.4–6.0 mm. sp. n. is in the external shape and morphology of the male genitalia very similar to . It differs only in the shape of the parameres: the left paramere is more narrow in sp. n., its dorsal margin weakly and evenly curved (Fig. 1E). From the Latin word sculptilis – modelled, sculptured, with reference to the shape of the aedeagus. http://zoobank.org/57A2C8C3-2985-4255-B59F-DB5329A66490 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Wang Tong, to light, 29/4/07” (ZFMK). Paratypes: 1 ♂ [China] “Huangniushi, Mt. Jiulianshan, Jiangxi, 16.VI.1975, PageBreakPageBreakleg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Luoyang, Lianxian County, Guangdong, 22.VI.1965, leg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS). Body length: 9.1 mm, length of elytra: 6.9 mm, width: 5.8 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.6. Antennal club 1.3 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.7. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.2; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 1I–K. Habitus: Fig. 1L. Female unknown. Body length: 8.2–9.1 mm, length of elytra: 6.5–6.9 mm, width: 5.5–5.8 mm. sp. n. is in the external shape and morphology of the male genitalia similar to and . It differs by the lacking tooth at the posterior margin of metafemur and in the shape of the parameres: the right paramere is straight (in dorsal view) and not curved as in and (Fig. 1J). sp. n. is named after its type locality, Wang Tong. Ahrens, Liu & Fabrizi sp. n. http://zoobank.org/BBC43CD4-2FEE-431E-AD26-9B0D56CDC45B Holotype: ♂ “Guangxi, Maoershan, 2011-VI-4/ LW-1066” (ZFMK). Body length: 8.3 mm, length of elytra: 6.8 mm, width: 3.1 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.61. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.5. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin with a blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/2.84; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 2A–C. Habitus: Fig. 2D.
Figure 2.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–J sp. n. (holotype) K–N sp. n. (holotype). A, E, K aedeagus, left side lateral view C, I, M aedeagus, right side lateral view B, H, L parameres, dorsal view F parameres, distal view G parameres, ventral view D, J, N habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–J sp. n. (holotype) K–N sp. n. (holotype). A, E, K aedeagus, left side lateral view C, I, M aedeagus, right side lateral view B, H, L parameres, dorsal view F parameres, distal view G parameres, ventral view D, J, N habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm. Female unknown. sp. n. is in the external shape and morphology of the male genitalia similar to and . It differs by the shape of the parameres: the dorsal lobe of the right paramere is short and does not exceed the length of the ventral lobe (Fig. 2C). The new species is named after its type locality, Maoershan. http://zoobank.org/C23EC86C-5F90-4403-9617-826F307FB92C Holotype: ♂ “China, Hainan Isl., 4-6.v.2011 Limushan Mts. Frst administr. Centre (at light) 19°10'30"N, 109°44'33"E, 630m, M. Fikáček, V. Kubeček & L. Li leg.” (NMPC). Paratypes: 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀ [China] “Nankai Mingya, Baisha, Hainan, 25–26.V.2008, 450m, leg. Ba Yibin, Lang Juntong” (HBUM, ZFMK), 1 ♂ [China] “East of Mts. Bawangling, Changjiang, Hainan, 5-7.VI.2008, 750m, leg. Ba Yibin, Lang Juntong” (HBUM). Body length: 9.7 mm, length of elytra: 7 mm, width: 6 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.6. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.8. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/2.7; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 2E–I. Habitus: Fig. 2J. sp. n. is in the external shape and morphology of the male genitalia similar to . It differs by the shape of the parameres: the dorsal lobe of the right paramere (in lateral view) is curved ventrally (while being straight in ) (Fig. 2I), the left paramere is reduced in size (Fig. 2E). Body length: 8.0–9.7 mm, length of elytra: 6.0–7.0 mm, width: 4.8–6 mm. Head of the female paratype is missing. The new species is named after one of the collectors of the type series, Martin Fikáček (Prague). http://zoobank.org/BCABBEB5-D1E5-4639-9042-64DF2FDD6E9B Holotype: ♂ “Bawangzhen, Changjiang, Hainan, 5–7.VI.2008, leg. Ba Yibin, Lang Juntong” (HBUM). Paratype: 1 ♂ “Mt. Jianfengling, Hainan, 10.VI.1965” (IZAS). Body length: 8.4 mm, length of elytra: 6.5 mm, width: 5.4 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.63. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.67. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/2.74; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 2K–M. Habitus: Fig. 2N. Female unknown. Body length: 7.7–8.4 mm, length of elytra: 6.1–6.5 mm, width: 5.0–5.4 mm. sp. n. differs from the similar sp. n. by the shape of the parameres: the dorsal lobe of the right paramere (in lateral view) is extremely short (Fig. 2M), the left paramere is distinctly longer and curved externally at the apex (Fig. 2K, L). The new species is named after its type locality, Changjiang. http://zoobank.org/745D0838-F4C7-42BA-8C16-A22ECAB1A0B8 Holotype: ♂ “China: Sichuan; Wolong Reserve, Sigulian Shan, 31°09'N, 103°06'E v.2006, 1500–1800m leg. V. Siniaev” (ZFMK). Paratypes: 1 ♂ “Suifu (nr) Sz. China/ DC Graham coll. Aug 25-7, ‘29” (USNM), 1 ♂ “Szechuen China DC Graham/ bet Yachow and Mupin Jun.23-6 ‘29 2000-3000ft.” (USNM), 3 ♂♂ “Minzhuzhen, Lan'gao County, Shaanxi, 4.VII.2003, leg. Yuan Caixia, Liu Yushuang” (HBUM), 1 ♂ “Longju, Wanxian County, Sichuan, 18.VI.1995, 2500m, leg. Wang Shuyong” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Foping, Shaanxi, 26.VI.1999, 890m, leg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Chongqing, Jinfoshan, 2010-VI-13, 713m” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Xiuqizhen, Chengkou, Chongqing, 13.VII.2003, leg. Yuan Caixia, Liu Yushuang” (HBUM), 1 ♂ “Ningshan, Shaanxi, VIII.1982, light trap” (NUYS), 1 ♂ “Zhongmiao, Bikou, Wenxian County, Gansu, 24.VI.1998, 700m, leg. Yuan Decheng” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “China, Sichuan 12.-14.VII.1995 Baoxing env., cca 50km NNW of Yaan 30°22'N, 102°50'E M. Trýzna et O. Šafranek lgt.” (CPPB). Body length: 7.6 mm, length of elytra: 5.9 mm, width: 4.8 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.6. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.4. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 3A–C. Habitus: Fig. 3D.
Figure 3.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm. Female unknown. Body length: 6.6–7.6 mm, length of elytra: 5.1–5.9 mm, width: 3.9–4.8 mm. sp. n. differs from the similar sp. n. by the shape of parameres: the dorsal (= basal) lobe of the right paramere (in lateral view) is long, filiform, and strongly curved (Fig. 3A), the left paramere is much longer than that of sp. n. (Fig. 2K, L). The new species is named after its type locality, Sigulian Shan. http://zoobank.org/48AB99AF-AF42-40A8-9775-9FE3054E1D22 Holotype: ♂ “China: E-Yunnan; Damaidi 2500m, Guangnan near Vietnam VII-2003 leg. Li et al.” (ZFMK). Paratypes: China. 1 ♂ “China: E-Yunnan; Damaidi 2500m, Guangnan near Vietnam VII-2003 leg. Li et al.” (ZFMK), 1 ♂ “Jiangfu Famuchang, Jiangle, Fujian, 22.VI.1991, 470m, leg. Yang Longlong” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Mt. Dawuling, Xinyi, 24.V.2002, leg. Jia Fenglong, No. En-048009” (SYUG), 2 ♂♂ “Luoxiang, Jinxiu, Guangxi, 15.V.1999, 400m, leg. Xiao Hui” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Mt. Daweishan, Pingbian, Yunnan, 18.VI.1956, 1500m, light trap, leg. Huang Keren etc.” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Mt. Yaoshan, 6.V.1938”(IZAS), 1 ♀ “Beidou, Napo, Guangxi, 9, 11–13.IV.1998, 550m, leg. Wu Min, Qiao Geixa” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Nongxin, Napo, Guangxi, 12.IV.1998, 440m, leg. Qiao Gexia” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Beidou, Napo, Guangxi, 9.IV.1998, 550m, leg. Qiao Gexia” (IZAS). Vietnam. 1 ♂ “N Vietnam (Tonkin) Ha Noi (city) 4.-5.V.1990 Vit. Kubáň leg. (ZFMK), 4 ♂♂, 10 ♀♀ “N-Vietnam Sa Pa env., Lao Cai Prov. 22°19'52"N, 103°50'35"E 1630–1680m 23.–27.V.1999 leg. Fabrizi, Jäger, Ahrens” (ZFMK), 1 ♂, 1 ♀ “N-Vietnam Bac Ha env., Lao Cai Prov. 22°32'05"N, 104°32'32"E 980–1000m 28.–30.V.1999 leg. Fabrizi, Jäger, Ahrens” (ZFMK), 2 ♀♀ “N.-Vietnam Fan Si Pan near Sapa, 1500–1950m 17.–30.VI.1999 A. Kallies leg.” (ZFMK), 1 ♂ “Vietnam N (Sa Pa) Lao Cai Prov., 250km from Hanoi bearing 31°, Sa Pa vill. env. Hoang Lien Son Nat. Res. 21.–23.6.1998 1250m leg. A. Napolov” (CNAR), 8 ♂♂ “Vietnam N (Sa Pa) Lao Cai Prov., 250km from Hanoi bearing 31°, Sa Pa vill. env. Hoang Lien Son Nat. Res. 27.V.–15.VI.1995 1250m leg. A. Napolov” (CNAR), 11 ♂♂ “Vietnam N (Sa Pa) Lao Cai Prov., 250km from Hanoi bearing 31°, Sa Pa vill. env. Hoang Lien Son Nat. Res. 27.5.–3.6.1998 1250m leg. A. Napolov” (CNAR), 1 ♂ “Vietnam N (Sa Pa) Lao Cai Prov., 250km from Hanoi bearing 31°, Sa Pa vill. env. Hoang Lien Son Nat. Res. 16.–20.VI.1998 1250m leg. A. Napolov” (CNAR). Body length: 7.6 mm, length of elytra: 5.8 mm, width: 4.6 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.67. Antennal club 1.3 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.5. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.21; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 3E–G. Habitus: Fig. 3H. Body length: 6.9–7.6 mm, length of elytra: 5.1–5.8 mm, width: 4.0–4.6 mm. Female has the antennal club composed of three lamellae, short, as long as the remaining antennomeres combined; eyes as large as those in male. The new species differs from the other known species by having both parameres simple, not being divided in two lobes. The new species is named after its type locality, Damaidi. http://zoobank.org/0E8B453F-D81F-484B-9897-7F615908507C Holotype: ♂ “Shunbi, Yangbi, Yunnan, 16.VIII.2009, leg. Shi Fuming” (HBUM). Body length: 8.9 mm, length of elytra: 6.3 mm, width: 5 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.66. Antenna missing in holotype. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.5. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.4; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 3I–K. Habitus: Fig. 3L. Female unknown. The new species differs from in the shape of the parameres: the left paramere is straight instead of being curved dorsally (Fig. 3I), the right paramere is slender in dorsal view, lacking the basal dorsal tooth (Fig. 3J) which is present in . The new species is named after its type locality, Shunbi. http://zoobank.org/21E3E7F4-6784-45F3-8019-7DA174F598F0 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Nonggang, Longzhou, Guangxi, 15.VI.2000, 330m, leg. Chen Jun” (IZAS). Body length: 7.5 mm, length of elytra: 5.5 mm, width: 4.6 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes small; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.48. Antennal club 1.1 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.48. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.3; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 4A–C. Habitus: Fig. 4D.
Figure 4.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm. Female unknown. sp. n. differs from all other species with straight or slightly convex posterior margin of metafemur by the small eyes, short ventral process of phallobasis being at maximum subequeal to half of the length of the phallobasis, strongly asymmetric phallobasis (dorsal view), right paramere being simple, and left paramere having the ventral lobe shorter than the dorsal one. The new species is named after its type locality, Longzhou. http://zoobank.org/90F90FBE-55EC-4183-B7F3-41659BC1E687 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Yao District, Mengla, Yunnan, 11.V.1991, leg. Liu Guangchun, Cai Wanzhi” (NUYS). Body length: 8.3 mm, length of elytra: 6.5 mm, width: 5.1 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.62. Antennal club 1.6 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.5. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.2; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 4E–G. Habitus: Fig. 4H. Female unknown. sp. n. differs from all other species with straight posterior margin of metafemur by the short ventral process of the phallobasis being subequal to half of the length of phallobasis, right paramere being simple and basiventrally strongly widened towards apex, and left paramere having two lobes. The new species is named after its type locality, Yaoqu. http://zoobank.org/DF2660FC-8E23-4C34-9E1E-986936B883C3 Holotype: ♂ “China: E-Yunnan; Damaidi 2500m, Guangnan near Vietnam VII-2003 leg. Li et al.” (ZFMK). Paratypes: 1 ♂ “China, SE-Yunnan Xichou-E env. 1400–1700m, 13.–18.5.95/ 23°11–16'/ 104°41–49' L.+R. Businský lgt.” (CPPB), 1 ♂ [China] “Yunnan 2000–2500m 25.42N 100.08E Cangshan mts. E slope 21.VI.92 David Král leg.” (NMPC), 1 ♂ [China] “Mts. Laoshan, Weihuo, Tianlin, Guangxi, 4.VI.2002, 1400m, leg. Jiang Guofang” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Luodian, Guizhou, 29.V.1981, 500m, leg. Li Fasheng” (CAU), 2 ♂♂ [China] “Xinyicun, PageBreakPageBreakXichang, Sichuan, 18.V.1974, leg. Han Yinheng” (IZAS), 3 ♂♂ [China] “Meng'e, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, 19.V.1958, leg. Hong Chunpei” (IZAS, ZFMK). Body length: 7 mm, length of elytra: 5.3 mm, width: 4.6 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.7. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.4. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.3; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 4E–G. Habitus: Fig. 4H. Female unknown. Body length: 7.0–7.8 mm, length of elytra: 5.3–5.6 mm, width: 4.4–4.6 mm. sp. n. differs from by the smaller body, shorter antennal club, and the right paramere being simple, long and narrow. The species name is derived from the combined Latin words, longus – long and penis – male copulation organ, with reference to the long parameres of the species. http://zoobank.org/BFE3EECD-6FE2-4C1D-9D70-F80CEF0D1F31 Holotype: ♂ “China, S-Yunnan Prov. Xishuangbanna 23km NW Jinghong Na Ban village 680m 22°10.04'N, 100°39.52'E, 20.V.2008, leg. A. Weigel, LF” (NME). Paratypes. 1 ♂ [China] “Xiaomengyang, Yunnan, 7.V.1957, 850m, leg. Pu Fuji” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Yunnan, Nabanhe Nature Reserve, Guomenshan, 2009-VI-16/ LW-1230” (ZFMK). Body length: 7.6 mm, length of elytra: 5.8 mm, width: 5 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.63. Antenna missing in holotype. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.69. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.36; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 5A–C. Habitus: Fig. 5D.
Figure 5.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm. Female unknown. Body length: 6.8–7.6 mm, length of elytra: 5.2–5.8 mm, width: 4.1–5.0 mm. sp. n. differs from all other species with long ventral phallobasal process by the simple left paramere being not separated into lobes, right paramere having no brush of spines and being composed of two lobes: its dorsal lobe is narrow, evenly curved and sharply pointed. The species name is named after its type locality, Jinghong Na Ban village. http://zoobank.org/D5152BD3-A0F2-4A16-9A8C-DCBC8322BC0F Holotype: ♂ [China] “Menglong, Yunnan, 22.IV.1982, light trap, leg. Jiang Shengqiao” (IZAS). Body length: 7.6 mm, length of elytra: 5.8 mm, width: 4.3 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.59. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.64. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.23; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 5E–G. Habitus: Fig. 5H. Female unknown. sp. n. differs from by the slightly lighter colour, bilobate left paramere, as well as the right paramere having the dorsal lobe shorter than the ventral one (Fig. 5E). The new species is named after its type locality, Menglong. http://zoobank.org/8BB6DBDE-F5BC-4808-9BE2-3459B99E377D Holotype: ♂ “Tianchi, Jianfeng, Hainan, 13.IV.1980, 900m, leg. Wang Shuyong” (IZAS). Paratype: 1 ♂ “Tianchi, Jianfeng, Hainan, 18.IV.1980, 750m, leg. Wang Shuyong” (ZFMK). Body length: 9.1 mm, length of elytra: 6.9 mm, width: 5.7 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.63. Antennal club 1.3 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.56. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight, without blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.24; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 5I–K. Habitus: Fig. 5L. Female unknown. Body length: 9.1–10.5 mm, length of elytra: 6.9–8.4 mm, width: 5.7–6.1 mm. sp. n. differs from by dorsal lobe of the right paramere being wide, with a sickle-shaped, large apical hook (Fig. 5J). The new species is named after its type locality, Tianchi. http://zoobank.org/D3CCF90A-4B08-4141-A735-D2D311ABE1D1 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Yunnan, Lianghe, 2011-V-4, N: 24.789, E: 98.264, 1130m/ LW-1316” (ZFMK). Body length: 9.7 mm, length of elytra: 7.3 mm, width: 5.5 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.59. Antennal club 1.1 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.56. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin with a large sharp hook. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.1; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 6A–C. Habitus: Fig. 6D.
Figure 6.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm. Female unknown. sp. n. differs from all other known species by the large and sharp hook at the posterior margin of metafemur. The new species is named after its type locality, Lianghe. http://zoobank.org/63505155-B061-49FC-B407-E0BD37477162 Holotype: ♂ “China, W Yunnan prov., mts. 60km E Tengchong, 2200m, 19.–22.v.2006, S. Murzin & I. Shokhin” (CPPB). Paratype: 1 ♂ “Yunnan 2200-2500m 24.57N 98.45E 8-16/5. Gaoligong mts. Vit Kubáň leg. 1995” (ZFMK). Body length: 8.9 mm, length of elytra: 7.2 mm, width: 5.7 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes small; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.5. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.6. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin with a large sharp hook. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.2; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 6E–G. Habitus: Fig. 6H. Female unknown. Body length: 8.9–9.8 mm, length of elytra: 7.1–7.2 mm, width: 5.5–5.7 mm. sp. n. differs from by the following features: phallobasis in dorsal view is only slightly asymmetric; left and right parameres are simple, without two lobes; posterior angles of the pronotum are strongly rounded. The species name is derived from the combined Latin words, gracilis – fine, and forceps – forceps, with reference to the fine and simple parameres of the species. http://zoobank.org/02009348-3716-4747-B9AD-9B82890893C9 Holotype: ♂ “China: Hunan; Mupu Mt. 1600m, Pingjiang VIII-2003, leg. Li et al.” (ZFMK). Paratypes: China. 1 ♀ “China: Hunan; Mupu Mt. 1600m, Pingjiang VIII-2003, leg. Li et al.” (ZFMK), 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀ “China: Hubei; Dahongshan 1700m Shuizhou VI-2003 leg. Ying et al.” (ZFMK), 1 ♂ “China: S-Yunnan Prov. Xishuangbanna 20km NW Jinghong Man Dian (NNNR) 720m 22°07.80'N, 100°40.05'E, 26.v.2008, light trap, leg. A. Weigel” (NME), 1 ♂ “Jingdong, Yunnan, 30.V.1956, 1170m, leg. Krischanovskna” (IZAS), 2 ♂♂ [China] “Jingdong, Yunnan, 22.V, 1.VI.1956, 1170m, leg. Zagulaev, Polov” (IZAS), 2 ♂♂ [China] “Mt. Junzishan, Shizong, Yunnan, 14,16.VII.2006, leg. Mao Benyong etc.” (HBUM), 1 ♂ “Jingdong, Yunnan, 29.IV.1957, 1200m, leg. Zagulaev” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Yunnan, Honghe, Hekou, Binlangzhai Shuiku, 2011-V-14/ LW-1076” (IZAS), 4 ♂♂ [China] “Jingdong, Yunnan, 26,30.V.1956, 1170m, leg. Krischanovskna, light trap” (IZAS), 3 ♂♂ [China] “Jingdong, Yunnan, 1,3.VII.1956, 1170m, leg. Krischanovskna, light trap” (IZAS), 8 ♂♂ [China] “Jingdong, Yunnan, 2,5,8,12,20,21,28.VI.1956, 1170m, leg. Krischanovskna, light trap” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Jingdong, Yunnan, 17.V.1957, 1200m, leg. Montschadskij” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Jingdong, Yunnan, 8.IV.1957, 1200m, leg. Montschadskij” (IZAS), 7 ♂♂, 1 ♀ [China] “Jingdong, Yunnan, 10.V.1957, 1200m, leg. Montschadskij” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “22 km Northeast of Jingdong, 12.V.1957,leg. Montschadskij” (IZAS), 4 ♂♂ [China] “Jingdong, Yunnan, 23,31.V.1956, 1170–1300m, leg. Ivanov, light trap” (IZAS), 2 ♂♂ [China] “Jingdong, Yunnan, 3.VI.1956, 1170m, leg. Zagulaev” (IZAS), 4 ♂♂ [China] “Jingdong, Yunnan, 30.VI.1956, 1170m, leg. Zagulaev” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Dongjiafen, Jingdong, Yunnan, 27.VI.1956, 1250m, leg. A. Shnitnikov” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Fulong, Fangcheng, Guangxi, 23.V.1999, 200m, leg. Ke Xin” (IZAS), 1♂ [China] “Fulong, Fangcheng, Guangxi, 25.V.1999, 200m, leg. Zhang Xuezhong” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Hongqi Forestry Farm, Shangsi, Guangxi, 28.V.1999, 300m, leg. Zhang Xuezhong” (IZAS), 3 ♂♂ [China] “Banbaxiang, Fangcheng, Guangxi, 16.V.2000, 550m, leg. Li Wenzhu” (IZAS), 2 ♂♂ [China] “Huanian (Eshan, YunPageBreaknan), 15.VI.(19)83, No.312,319” (IZAS), 3 ♂♂ [China] “Mengla, Jinping, Yunnan, 17,20.IV.1956, 370m, leg. Huang Keren et.al.” (IZAS), 2 ♂♂ [China] “Menglun, Yunnan, 22.IV.1982, leg. Jiang, light trap” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Menglun, Yiwubanna, 8.VII.1964, 650m, leg. Zhang Baolin” (IZAS). Myanmar. 1 ♂ “Burma (Myanmar) E Shan state Kengtung (Kyaingtong) J. Rejsek 14.–15.6.1997” (ZFMK). Vietnam. 1 ♂ “N Vietnam (Tonkin) Ha Noi (city) 4.–5.V.1990 Vit. Kubáň leg. (ZFMK), 1 ♂ “Vietnam, Cuc Phong, 100km SE of Hanoi; V-1993; leg. Michio Hori” (ZFMK), 1 ♂ “Vietnam N. Tonkin Cuc-Phong Nat. Park 2.–12.V.1991 E. Jendek leg.” (ZFMK), 45 ♂♂, 44 ♀♀ “N-Vietnam Bac Ha env., Lao Cai Prov., 22°32‘05‘'N, 104°17‘32‘‘E 980-1000m 28.–30.V.1999 leg. Fabrizi, Jager, Ahrens” (ZFMK), 1 ♂ “N. Vietnam: Sontay, 400m, 20.V.1963 leg. Le Van Dyk” (Coll. Kabakov), 1 ♂ “N. Vietnam: Sonla Songma, 500m, 3.V.1990 leg. Schorkov” (Coll. Kabakov), 1 ♂ “N. Vietnam: 40km NE Thainguyen, 300m, 8.V.1963, leg. O. Kabakov” (Coll. Kabakov), 1 ♂ “S. Vietnam (Cat Tien) 120 km NNE Ho Chi Minh, Cat Tien Nat. Park 30.5.–15.6.1995 leg. A. Napolov” (CNAR), 17 ♂♂ “Vietnam N (Sa Pa) Lao Cai Prov., 250km from Hanoi bearing 31°, Sa Pa vill. env. Hoang Lien Son Nat. Res. 27.5.–3.6.1998 1250m leg. A. Napolov” (CNAR, ZFMK), 2 ♂♂ “Vietnam N (Sa Pa) Lao Cai Prov., 250km from Hanoi bearing 31°, Sa Pa vill. env. Hoang Lien Son Nat. Res. 27.V.-3.VI.1998 1250m leg. A. Napolov” (CNAR, ZFMK), 1 ♂ “Vietnam N (Sa Pa) Lao Cai Prov., 250km from Hanoi bearing 31°, Sa Pa vill. env. Hoang Lien Son Nat. Res. 16.–20.VI.1998 1250m leg. A. Napolov” (CNAR), 3 ♂♂ “Vietnam N (Sa Pa) Lao Cai Prov., 250km from Hanoi bearing 31°, Sa Pa vill. env. Hoang Lien Son Nat. Res. 25.VI.–5.VII.1998 1250m leg. A. Napolov” (CNAR), 3 ♂♂ “Vietnam N (Sa Pa) Lao Cai Prov., 250km from Hanoi bearing 31°, Sa Pa vill. env. Hoang Lien Son Nat. Res. 21.–23.6.1998 1250m leg. A. Napolov” (CNAR), 3 ♂♂ “Vietnam-N (Na Hang) 160km from Ha Noi, NE env. of Na Hang, 26.5.–6.6.1996 150–200m leg. A. Napolov & I. Roma” (CNAR), 1 ♂ “X-DA3434 - Vietnam, N. Vietnam: Hanoi Prov., Ba Vi National Park (at light) 21–24.vi.2012 L. Bartolozzi, S. Bambi, F. Fabiano, E. Orbach” (MZUF). Thailand. 2 ♂♂, 3 ♀♀ “Thailand, Nam Nao, Phetchabua; 16°5'N,101°40'E; 19.V.1999; leg. K. Masumoto” (ZFMK), 1 ♂, 1 ♀ “Phu Rua NP (900m alt.), Loei P., NE Thai. 26–30.IV.2006 Takakuwa, M. leg.” (ZFMK), 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀ “N. Thailand, Chiang Mai, Erawan Resort; 22.IV.1992; leg. Kazuo Kawano” (ZFMK), 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ “N. Thailand, Nan, Wiang Sa; 14.V.1993; leg. S. Ohmomo” (ZFMK), 1 ♂ “839493 Tetraserica ThaiSpMU09_1 Thailand S. Murzin 28./31.5.2009 Chiang Dao Hill resort (100km N of Chiang Mai) 600m/ 839493” (ZFMK), 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ “Thailand bor. Chiang Dao env., 21.5.–4.6.1995 lgt. M. Snizek” (ZFMK), 2 ♂♂ “NW Thailand 24.-27.4.1991 Chom Thong leg. Pacholátko/ TS98” (CPPB), 1 ♂ “Thai 11–15.V.1998 Nan-Pha Khab Pacholátko & Dembický leg.” (CPPB), 1 ♂ “NW Thailand, 1991 Chow Thong, 24.–27.4. 18.26N, 98.41E L. Dembicky leg.” (NHMW), 1 ♂ “Thailand Chiangmai Prov.; Fang (Agr Exp. Station), 600 m 14.VI.1965” (BPBM), 2 ♂♂, 1 ♀ “N. Thailand: Angkhai village, Samoeng Dist. Chiang Mai Prov., 9–11.v.1999 K. Masumoto leg,” (ZFMK), 1 ♂ “N. Thailand: Chiang Mai Pref., Ban Angkhai, Samoeng Dist., 750 m, 15–20.V.1998 K. Matsumoto PageBreakleg.” (ZFMK). Laos. 1 ♂ “Laos, 21°09'N, 101°19'E Louangnamtha pr. Namtha → Muang Sing, 5-31.v.1997, 900-1200m Vit Kubáň leg./ LS11” (CPPB), 1 ♂ “Laos centr., 27.IV.–1.V.1997, 70km NE Vientiane Ban Phabat env., 150m, N18°16.1', E103°10.9' E. Jendek & Šauša leg.” (CPPB), 1 ♂ “Laos, Bolikhamxai pr. 18°16'N, 103°11'E 70km NEE Vientiane, 27-30.iv.1997, 150m, Vit Kubáň leg.” (CPPB), 2 ♂♂ “N. Laos Louang Namtha 1.5.1996 I. Pjushtch lg” (ZFMK), 35 ♂♂, 19 ♀♀ “Laos P.D.R. Xieng Khowang 14–20. May 1994 K. Miura leg.” (ZFMK), 2 ♂♂ “NE-Laos: Hua Phan prov.; Ban Saleui, Phou Pan (Mt.) 20°12'N, 104°01'E 11.iv.–15.v.2012, 1300–1900 m leg. C. Holzschuh → ZFMK Ankauf 2012/13” (ZFMK), 5 ♂♂ “Laos, La Oudomxay 16.6.2005, ex. coll. Sabatinelli” (ZFMK), 4 ♂♂ “Laos-N, Louang Namtha circ. 04.05.1996, I. Pjushtch lg” (ZFMK). Body length: 10.0 mm, length of elytra: 7.5 mm, width: 6.0 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.6. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.6. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin with a blunt tooth. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/2.9; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 6I–K. Habitus: Fig. 6L. sp. n. differs from all other species with a blunt tooth at the posterior margin of metafemur by the long and narrow left paramere. The new species is named after its type locality, Pingjiang. Body length: 8.8–10.0 mm, length of elytra: 6.9–7.5 mm, width: 5.4–6.0 mm. Female has the antennal club composed of three lamellae, short, as long as remaining antennomeres combined; eyes are as large as those in male. http://zoobank.org/D422148E-C6DA-4584-8F5E-07FD832F4CE3 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Yunnan, Wanding, 2011-IV-29, N: 24.086, E: 98.072, 900m/ LW-1247” (ZFMK). Paratype: 1 ♂ [China] “Yunnan, Wanding, 2011-IV-29, N: 24.086, E: 98.072, 900m/ LW-1247bis” (IZAS). Body length: 9.3 mm, length of elytra: 6.9 mm, width: 5.4 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.72. Antennal club 1.5 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.56. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin with a large sharp hook. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.13; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 7A–C. Habitus: Fig. 7D.
Figure 7.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H (Moser) comb. n. (lectotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view; B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H (Moser) comb. n. (lectotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view; B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm. Female unknown. Body length: 8.8–9.3 mm, length of elytra: 6.9–7.1 mm, width: 5.4–5.6 mm. sp. n. differs from by the larger eyes (ratio diameter/interocular distance: 0.72 vs. 0.59) and dorsal lobe of the right paramere being very small and bent basally. The new species is named after the type locality, Wanding. (Moser, 1908) comb. n. Moser, 1908: 328 (type locality: Tonkin, Mt.Mauson). Lectotype (here designated): ♂ [Vietnam] “Tonkin Montes Mauson April, Mai 2-3000' H. Fruhstorfer/ tonkinensis Mos.” (ZMHB). Paralectotypes: 1 ♀ [Vietnam] “Tonkin Montes Mauson April, Mai 2-3000' H. Fruhstorfer/ tonkinensis Mos.” (ZMHB), 5 ♀♀ [Vietnam] “Tonkin Montes Mauson April, Mai 2-3000' H. Fruhstorfer” (ZMHB).

Additional material examined.

1 ♂ [China] “Luoxiang, Jinxiu, Guangxi, 15.V.1999, 400m, leg. Li Wenzhu” (IZAS).

Redescription.

Body length: 9.0 mm, length of elytra: 7.0 mm, width: 5.9 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.66. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.45. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin with a large sharp hook. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.25; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 7E–G. Habitus: Fig. 7H. Body length: 8.7–9.0 mm, length of elytra: 6.7–7.0 mm, width: 5.4–5.9 mm. Female has small eyes (ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.6) and antennal club composed of 3 antennomeres being as long as the remaining antennomeres combined. The species is recorded for the first time for China. http://zoobank.org/A19A757A-ED28-4613-B2C0-500F3A6068BF Holotype: ♂ “China, SE Yunnan, Xichou - E env. 1400–1700m, 13.18.5.95/ 23°22–26'N/ 104°41–49'E L.+R. Businský lgt.” (CPPB). Body length: 9.0 mm, length of elytra: 6.7 mm, width: 5.8 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.7. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.6. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin with a large sharp hook. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.4; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 7I–K. Habitus: Fig. 7L. Female unknown. sp. n. differs from the very similar by the smaller dorsal lobe of the right paramere. The new species is named after its type locality, Xichou. http://zoobank.org/63DE72A9-77DD-42CB-AD49-69D2577F3978 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Meng'e, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, 19.V.1958, 1050–1080m, leg. Hong Chunpei” (IZAS). Paratypes: 1 ♂ [China] “Menghai, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, 19.VII.1958, 1200–1600m, leg. Wang Shuyong” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Menghun, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, 18.V.1958, 1200–1400m, leg. Zhang Yiran” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Yunnan, Huanglianshan, 2012-V-9, 1800m/ LW-1277” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Meng'e, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, 19.V.1958, 1050–1080m, leg. Hong Chunpei” (ZFMK). Body length: 7.4 mm, length of elytra: 5.7 mm, width: 4.3 mm. Body reddish brown. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.7. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.5. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.2; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 8A–C. Habitus: Fig. 8D.
Figure 8.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm. Female unknown. Body length: 7.4–8.6 mm, length of elytra: 5.7–7 mm, width: 4.3–5.9 mm. sp. n. differs from all other species with a brush of robust trichome-like spines at the base of the right paramere by the left paramere being split into two filiform branches behind the middle. The new species is named after its type locality, Meng'e. http://zoobank.org/4CBFFD98-D953-43C8-B15B-8B7A32B5666F Holotype: ♂ [China] “Nanmu Garden, Changshou, Sichuan, 9.VI.1994, 450m, leg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS). Paratype: 1 ♂ [China] “Mt. Xingdoushan, Lichuan, Hubei, 22.VII.1989, light trap, 810m, leg. Wang Shuyong” (ZFMK). Body length: 8.8 mm, length of elytra: 6.7 mm, width: 5.3 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.65. Antennal club as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.57. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight. Metatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.35; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 8E–G. Habitus: Fig. 8H. Female unknown. Body length: 8.0–8.8 mm, length of elytra: 6.0–6.7 mm, width: 5.0–5.3 mm. sp. n. differs from all other species with a brush of robust trichome-like spines at the base of the right paramere by the left paramere being composed of two lobes and the ventral lobe of the right paramere being abruptly and strongly widened at apex. The new species is named after its type locality, Changshou. http://zoobank.org/6CC6D618-2F79-4442-94C0-B3862420E683 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Hongqi Forestry Farm, Shangsi, Guangxi, 29.V.1999, 300m, leg. Ke Xin” (IZAS). Paratypes: 1 ♂ [China] “Nonggang, Longzhou, Guangxi, 21.V.1982, 240m, leg. Li Fasheng” (CAU), 1 ♂ [China] “Fu'ai, Pingxiang, Guangxi, 17.VI.1976, leg. Zhang Baolin” (ZFMK), 2 ♂♂ [China] “Hong Kong: Lantau I: San Shek Wan; v.1988” (BPBM), 1 ♂ [China] “Hongqi Forestry Farm, Shangsi, Guangxi, 29.V.1999, 300m, leg. Ke Xin” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Taojiang, Leishan, Guizhou, 5.VII.1988, 1000m, leg. Yang Longlong, light trap” (IZAS). Body length: 8.1 mm, length of elytra: 6.2 mm, width: 4.6 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.76. Antennal club as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.61. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight. PageBreakMetatibia short and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.13; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 8I–K. Habitus: Fig. 8L. Female unknown. Body length: 7.0–8.1 mm, length of elytra: 5.6–6.7 mm, width: 4.4–4.8 mm. The new species differs from the similar sp. n. by the left paramere being evenly curved without being clearly bent, and having a tiny lateral tooth before apex which is absent in . The new species is named after its type locality in Shangsi prefecture (Guangxi province). Ahrens, Liu & Fabrizi sp. n. http://zoobank.org/AA46D770-40D2-4DBE-BC2D-A2C753380157 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Yunnan, Ruili, 2011-IV-27, N: 24.059, E: 97.955, 825m/ LW-1216” (ZFMK). Body length: 8.1 mm, length of elytra: 5.8 mm, width: 4.8 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.63. Antennal club 1.2 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.74. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight. Metatibia moderately long and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.54; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 9A–C. Habitus: Fig. 9D.
Figure 9.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm. Female unknown. sp. n. differs from all species with straight posterior margin of metafemur, long ventral phallobasis process, and right paramere without brush of spines by the right paramere being simple, not composed of two lobes. The new species is named after its type locality, Ruili. http://zoobank.org/7B065A6C-2F05-4F13-8433-B399B296CE08 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Mts. Linaoshan, Langping, Tianlin, Guangxi, 28.V.2002, 1400m, leg. Jiang Guofang” (IZAS). Body length: 8.8 mm, length of elytra: 6.6 mm, width: 5.2 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.63. Antennal club as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length PageBreakPageBreakof metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.5. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight. Metatibia moderately long and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.69; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 9E–G. Habitus: Fig. 9H. Female unknown. sp. n. differs from all species with a brush of robust trichome-like spines at the base of the right paramere by the left paramere possessing a small lateral basal tooth. The new species is named after its type locality, Mt. Linaoshan. http://zoobank.org/D5CBA763-DBD0-4B9A-8053-A43F48426C92 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Huyu County, Ruili, Yunnan, 11.VI.1956, 1400m, leg. Zhou Benshou” (IZAS). Body length: 9 mm, length of elytra: 7 mm, width: 5.3 mm. Surface of labroclypeus and disc of frons glabrous. Smooth area anterior to eye twice as wide as long. Eyes moderately large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.63. Antennal club 1.3 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.55. Metafemur dull, anterior margin acute, without submarginal serrated line; anterior row of setae-bearing punctures absent; posterior margin straight. Metatibia moderately long and wide, ratio width/length: 1/3.47; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia at first third of metatibial length. Aedeagus. Fig. 9I–K. Habitus: Fig. 9L. Female unknown. sp. n. differs from all species with a brush of robust trichome-like spines at the base of the right paramere by the dorsal lobe of the right paramere convexly widened and elongate. The new species is named after its type locality, Ruili. http://zoobank.org/341DD0C8-BE82-49FD-AA0F-C3666547B313 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Cangchang, Anhua, Hunan, 15.VII.2004, leg. Wang Jiliang” (HBUM). Paratypes: 2 ♂♂ [China] “Hong Kong: N.T. Taipokau 12.VII.1965 Hand Net/ Lee Kit Ming & Hai Wai Ming Malaise Trap Bishop Museum” (BPBM, ZFMK), 1 ♂ [China] “Hong Kong: N.T. Taipokau 27.VI.1964/ M.J. Voss & Wai Ming Hui Collectors Bishop Museum” (BPBM), 1 ♂ [China] “Hong Kong: N.T. Taipokau 20.VI.1964/ Lee Kit Ming & Hai Wai Ming Light Trap Bishop Museum” (BPBM), 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ [China] “Shekou, Fu‘an, Fujian, 26.VII.1963, leg. PageBreakZhang Youwei” (IZAS), 1 ♀ [China] “Shekou, Fu‘an, Fujian, 27.VII.1963, leg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS), 2 ♂♂ [China] “Mt. Jiulianshan, Longnan, Jiangxi, 6.VI.1975, leg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Sidu, Guidong county, Hunan, 10.VII.2008, 774m, leg. Yang Ganyan” (IZAS), 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀ [China] “Qiliqiao, Chong'anxingcun, Fujian, 7,12,13.VII.1963, 840m, leg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS). Body length: 7.2 mm, length of elytra: 5.2 mm, width: 4.2 mm. Labroclypeus surface with a few erect setae. Disc of frons with a few single setae. Smooth area in front of eye approximately 4 times as wide as long. Eyes large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.82. Antennal club 1.4 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.5. Metafemur with a serrated continuous line beside anterior margin, with fine sparse punctures behind line each bearing a short seta. Metatibia moderately long, ratio width/length: 1/3.25; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia behind middle; beside dorsal margin in basal half with a blunt carina being partly finely serrate. Aedeagus. Fig. 10A–C. Habitus: Fig. 10D.
Figure 10.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm.

A–D sp. n. (holotype) E–H sp. n. (holotype) I–L sp. n. (holotype). A, E, I aedeagus, left side lateral view C, G, K aedeagus, right side lateral view B, F, J parameres, dorsal view D, H, L habitus (not to scale). Scale: 0.5 mm. Female unknown. Body length: 6.8–7.2 mm, length of elytra: 5.0–5.2 mm, width: 3.8–4.2 mm. sp. n. differs in a number of characters from all so far known species: metafemur possessing a serrated continuous line beside anterior margin and fine sparse punctures with short setae behind line; the labroclypeus and frons having a few erect setae on disc; basal group of dorsal spines situated behind the middle of metatibia; metatibia beside dorsal margin in basal half with a blunt carina being partly finely serrate. The new species is named after its type locality, Anhua. http://zoobank.org/E2F9DA66-5DB2-40A9-951B-703742353E08 Holotype: ♂ [China] “Leishan, Guizhou, 28.VI.1988, 800m, leg. Yin Huifen” (IZAS). Paratypes: 1 ♂ [China] “Mts. Fanjingshan, Jiangkou, Guizhou, 13.VIII.1988, 550m, leg. Yang Xingke” (ZFMK), 1 ♂ [China] “Mts. Fanjingshan, Jiangkou, Guizhou, 19.VIII.1988, 550m, leg. Yang Xingke” (IZAS), 1 ♂ [China] “Jiuniutang, Mao‘ershan, Guangxi, 13.VII.1985, 1100m, leg. Liao Subai” (IZAS). Body length: 6.8 mm, length of elytra: 5 mm, width: 4 mm. Body reddish brown. Labroclypeus surface with a few erect setae. Disc of frons with a few single setae. Smooth area in front of eye approximately 4 times as wide as long. Eyes large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.81. Antennal club 1.4 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.68. Metafemur with a serrated continuous line beside anterior margin, with fine sparse punctures behind line each bearing a short seta. Metatibia moderately long, ratio width/length: 1/3.64; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia behind middle; beside dorsal margin in basal half with a blunt carina being partly finely serrate. Aedeagus. Fig. 10E–G. Habitus: Fig. 10H. Female unknown. Body length: 6.8–7.7 mm, length of elytra: 5.0–5.6 mm, width: 4.0–4.6 mm. sp. n. is similar to externally and in the shape of male genitalia. differs by the reddish brown body colour, more slender metatibia (ratio length/width: >3.6), longer metacoxa. It also differs by the shape of the parameres: the left paramere is straight behind the base (while it is curved in ), with a long basal lobe (basal lobe in is short); the right paramere is more strongly curved externally at apex than in . The new species is named after its type locality, Leishan. http://zoobank.org/BF444964-991A-4682-A924-E4761954EE1E Holotype: ♂ [China] “Yaoan, Lianxian County, Guangdong, 28.VI.1965, leg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS). Paratypes: China. 1 ♂ “Qiliqiao, Chong‘anxingcun, Fujian, 12,13.VII.1963, 840m, leg. Zhang Youwei” (ZFMK), 1 ♂ “Mt. Jiulianshan, Longnan, Jiangxi, 8.VI.1975, light trap, leg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS), 1 ♀ “Daqiu Forestry Farm, Mt. Jiulianshan, Longnan, Jiangxi, 11.VI.1975, light trap, leg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Mt. Jiulianshan, Longnan, Jiangxi, 8.VI.1975, light trap, leg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS), 1♂ “Changguling Forestry Farm, Mts. Jinggangshan, Jiangxi, 4.VII.1975, light trap” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Xinzuochang, Boluo, Guangdong, 3.VI.1965, leg. Zhang Youwei” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Dong'an, Hunan, 20.V.(19)54” (IZAS), 1 ♂ “Guangxi, Shangsi Shiwandashan 2011-VII-7, 263m” (IZAS). Vietnam. 3 ♂♂ “Vietnam-N (Na Hang) 160km from Ha Noi, NE env. of Na Hang, 3.–14.6.1996 150-200m leg. A. Napolov & I. Roma” (CNAR, ZFMK), 1 ♂ “S. Vietnam (Cat Tien) 120 km NNE Ho Chi Minh, Cat Tien Nat. Park 30.5.-15.6.1995 leg. A. Napolov” (CNAR). Body length: 7.2 mm, length of elytra: 5.4 mm, width: 4.3 mm. Body reddish brown. Labroclypeus surface with a few erect setae. Disc of frons with a few single setae. Smooth area in front of eye approximately 4 times as wide as long. Eyes large; ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.86. Antennal club 1.3 times as long as remaining antennomeres combined. Ratio of length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.68. Metafemur with a serrated continuous line beside anterior margin, with fine sparse punctures behind line each bearing a short seta. Metatibia moderately long, ratio width/length: 1/3.82; basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia behind middle; beside dorsal margin in basal half with a blunt carina being partly finely serrate. Aedeagus. Fig. 10I–K. Habitus: Fig. 10L. Female unknown. Body length: 6.6–7.9 mm, length of elytra: 4.9–6.0 mm, width: 4.1–4.6 mm. Female has small eyes (ratio of diameter/interocular width: 0.51) and the antennal club composed of 3 antennomeres being as long as the remaining antennomeres combined. sp. n. is very similar to external and in the shape of male genitalia. It differs by the shape of parameres only: basal lobe of the left paramere is short (basal lobe in is long); basal lobe of the right paramere is wide and more than half as long as the paramere (short in ). The new species is named after its type locality, Yaoan. Distribution of species: sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., (Moser), sp. n., and sp. n. Distribution of species: sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., sp. n., and sp. n.
1Labroclypeus completely glabrous. Basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia before middle. Ratio ocular diameter/interocular distance <0.754
Labroclypeus with few fine setae. Basal group of dorsal spines of metatibia behind middle. Anterior margin of metafemur with continuously serrated adjacent line. Ratio ocular diameter/interocular distance >0.82
2Metatibia more robust, ratio length/width: < 3.3. Metacoxa shorter, ratio length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.5Tetraserica anhuaensis sp. n.
Metatibia more slender, ratio length/width: >3.6. Metacoxa longer, ratio length of metepisternum/metacoxa: 1/1.683
3Left paramere with long interior basal lobe (its length almost half of paramere length)Tetraserica yaoanica sp. n.
Left paramere with short interior basal lobe (its length less than quarter of paramere length)Tetraserica leishanica sp. n.
4Posterior margin of metafemur straight or slightly convex10
Posterior margin of metafemur with blunt tooth or sharp hook5
5Posterior margin of metafemur with blunt tooth6
Posterior margin of metafemur with sharp hook9
6Left paramere long and narrowTetraserica pingjiangensis sp. n.
Left paramere short and strout7
7Dorsal lobe of right paramere short, not exceeding length of ventral oneTetraserica maoershanensis sp. n.
Dorsal lobe of right paramere longer, exceeding length of ventral one8
8Left paramere more narrow, dorsal margin weakly and evenly curvedTetraserica sculptilis sp. n.
Left paramere stout, dorsal margin bluntly angulateTetraserica daqingshanica sp. n.
9Eyes smaller, ratio diameter/interocular distance: 0.59. Dorsal lobe of right paramere large and directed distally, exceeding ventral lobe by farTetraserica liangheensis sp. n.
Eyes larger, ratio diameter/interocular distance: 0.72. Dorsal lobe of right paramere very small and bent basallyTetraserica wandingensis sp. n.
10Ventral process of phallobasis short, distinctly shorter than phallobasis11
Ventral process of phallobasis long, subequal to length of phallobasis19
11Ventral process of phallobasis short, subequal to at maximum half of length of phallobasis13
Ventral process of phallobasis medium in length, about three quarter of phallobasis length12
12Metatibia more slender, ratio length/width ca. 3.4. Right paramere lacking basal lobeTetraserica shunbiensis sp. n.
Metatibia more robust, ratio length/width ca. 3.0. Right paramere with long filiform and curved basal lobeTetraserica sigulianshanica sp. n.
13Eyes of medium size, ratio diameter/interocular distance ≥ 0.615
Eyes small, ratio diameter/interocular distance ≤ 0.514
14Phallobasis in dorsal view only slightly asymmetric. Left and right parameres simple, without two lobes. Posterior angles of pronotum strongly roundedTetraserica graciliforceps sp. n.
Phallobasis in dorsal view strongly asymmetric. Right paramere simple, left paramere with ventral lobe shorter than dorsal one. Posterior angles of pronotum moderately roundedTetraserica longzhouensis sp. n.
15Both parameres with dorsal and ventral lobeTetraserica fikaceki sp. n.
One or both parameres simple, without two lobes16
16Both parameres simple, without two lobesTetraserica damaidiensis sp. n.
One of parameres complex, with two lobes17
17Right paramere simple, left one with two lobes; right paramere basiventrally strongly widened towards apexTetraserica yaoquensis sp. n.
Left paramere simple, right one with two lobes18
18Left paramere more slender, strongly evenly bent externallyTetraserica changjiangensis sp. n.
Left paramere more stout, almost straightTetraserica wangtongensis sp. n.
19Right paramere basally with brush of robust trichome-like spines20
Right paramere without brush of spines25
20Left paramere composed of two lobes. Ventral lobe of right paramere abruptly and strongly widened at apexTetraserica changshouensis sp. n.
Left paramere simple21
21Left paramere with small lateral basal toothTetraserica linaoshanica sp. n.
Left paramere without small lateral basal tooth22
22Left paramere split in two filiform branches behind middleTetraserica mengeana sp. n.
Left paramere simply filiform23
23Left paramere bent twice24
Left paramere evenly curved, without being clearly bent, before apex with tiny lateral toothTetraserica shangsiensis sp. n.
24Dorsal lobe of right paramere very smallTetraserica xichouensis sp. n.
Dorsal lobe of right paramere large, nearly as long as ventral lobeTetraserica tonkinensis (Moser)
25Right paramere simple, not composed of two lobes26
Right paramere composed of two lobes27
26Left paramere simpleTetraserica ruiliensis sp. n.
Left paramere composed of two lobesTetraserica longipenis sp. n.
27Left paramere simple28
Left paramere composed of two lobes29
28Dorsal lobe of right paramere wide, with sickle-shaped, large apical hookTetraserica tianchiensis sp. n.
Dorsal lobe of right paramere narrow, evenly curved and sharply pointedTetraserica jinghongensis sp. n.
29Dorsal lobe of right paramere triangular and short, sharply pointedTetraserica menglongensis sp. n.
Dorsal lobe of right paramere convexly widened and elongateTetraserica ruiliana sp. n.
  1 in total

1.  Towards the phylogeny of chafers (Sericini): analysis of alignment-variable sequences and the evolution of segment numbers in the antennal club.

Authors:  Dirk Ahrens; Alfried P Vogler
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 4.286

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Multiple species delimitation approaches with COI barcodes poorly fit each other and morphospecies - An integrative taxonomy case of Sri Lankan Sericini chafers (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).

Authors:  Uda Gedara Sasanka Lakmali Ranasinghe; Jonas Eberle; Jana Thormann; Claudia Bohacz; Suresh P Benjamin; Dirk Ahrens
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  A taxonomic revision of Neoserica (sensu lato): the species groups N. lubrica, N. obscura, and N. silvestris (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sericini).

Authors:  Wan-Gang Liu; Silvia Fabrizi; Ming Bai; Dirk Ahrens
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 1.546

3.  New species of Nipponoserica and Paraserica from China (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Sericini).

Authors:  Wan-Gang Liu; Silvia Fabrizi; Xingke Yang; Ming Bai; Dirk Ahrens
Journal:  Zookeys       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.