Literature DB >> 25407865

A comprehensive assessment of the prognostic utility of the Stephenson nomogram for salvage radiation therapy postprostatectomy.

Skyler Johnson1, William Jackson1, Corey Speers1, Felix Feng1, Daniel Hamstra2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the prognostic utility of the Stephenson nomogram for clinically relevant endpoints, freedom from metastasis (FFM), and prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS) in patients treated with salvage external beam radiation therapy (SRT) following a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From an institutional cohort of 575 patients treated with SRT between 1986 and 2010, the Stephenson nomogram variables were retrospectively collected and available for 179 patients. The prognostic impact of the Stephenson nomogram on 6-year freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), FFM, and PCSS was assessed on univariate and multivariate analysis using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. The prognostic utility of the Stephenson nomogram was compared with individual pretreatment, treatment, and clinical characteristics using concordance indices.
RESULTS: In the 179 patients with all available nomogram variables, median follow-up was 85.0 months (interquartile range [IQR], 53-113) and 6-year FFBF, FFM, and PCSS were 38% (95% confidence interval [CI], 30-46), 79% (95% CI, 73-85), and 96% (95% CI, 92-100), respectively. Univariate analysis, demonstrated that the Stephenson nomogram, as a continuous variable and as a risk stratified group, was prognostic of FFBF (both, P < .0001), FFM (both, P < .0001), and PCSS (both, P ≤ .0005). When analyzing individual Stephenson nomogram variables, multivariate analysis revealed that positive surgical margins (P = .02; hazard ratio [HR], 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8) and pre-RT PSA (P = .0001; HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0) were prognostic for FFM, while pre-RT PSA (P = .03; HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.4) was the only prognostic variable for PCSS. Concordance indices revealed the Stephenson nomogram to have superior prognostic capability for biochemical failure (0.71), distant metastasis (0.75), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (0.75) when compared with individual variables (BF all ≤ 0.65, DM all ≤ 0.67, PCSM all ≤ 0.71).
CONCLUSIONS: For patients treated with SRT for a rising PSA postprostatectomy, the Stephenson nomogram is an appropriate prognostic tool for estimating the response to treatment; however, there remains a need for improvement in current and future nomograms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25407865     DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2014.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  3 in total

1.  An Examination of the Association between FOXA1 Staining Level and Biochemical Recurrence following Salvage Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Michael G Heckman; Jessica L Robinson; Katherine S Tzou; Alexander S Parker; Kevin J Wu; Tracy W Hilton; William J Howat; Jodi L Miller; Pamela A Kreinest; Thomas M Pisansky; Steven E Schild; Jennifer L Peterson; Laura A Vallow; Jason S Carroll; Steven J Buskirk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A phase 2 trial of salvage radiation and concurrent weekly docetaxel after a rising prostate-specific antigen level after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  William C Jackson; Felix Y Feng; Stephanie Daignault; Maha Hussain; David Smith; Kathleen Cooney; Kenneth Pienta; Shruti Jolly; Brent Hollenbeck; Karin B Olson; Howard M Sandler; Michael E Ray; Daniel A Hamstra
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-12-09

3.  68Gallium-labelled PSMA-PET/CT as a diagnostic and clinical decision-making tool in Asian prostate cancer patients following prostatectomy.

Authors:  Janice S H Tan; Charles X Y Goh; Yen Sin Koh; Youquan Li; Jeffrey K L Tuan; Eu Tiong Chua; Terence W K Tan; Michael L C Wang; Lui Shiong Lee; Kae Jack Tay; Ravindran Kanesvaran; Chee Keong Toh; Aaron K T Tong; Winnie W C Lam; Melvin L K Chua
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.248

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.