BACKGROUND: Structured educational programmes for patients at risk for anaphylaxis have not yet been established. Patients and caregivers often lack adequate skills in managing the disease. METHODS: To investigate effects of structured patient education intervention on knowledge, emergency management skills and psychological parameters in patients with previous episodes of anaphylaxis and caregivers of affected children 95 caregivers (11 male, 84 female, mean age 37 years) of affected children and 98 patients (32 male, 66 female, mean age 47.5 years) were randomly assigned to an intervention (IG) or control group (CG) in a multicentre randomized controlled trial. The IG received two 3-h schooling modules of group education; the CG received standard auto-injector training only. Knowledge of anaphylaxis and emergency management competence in a validated training anaphylaxis situation as main outcome measures as well as secondary psychological parameters were assessed at baseline and 3 months after intervention. RESULTS: In comparison with controls, the intervention led to significant improvement of knowledge from baseline to 3-month follow-up (caregivers: IG 3.2/13.2 improvement/baseline vs CG 0.7/12.6; P < 0.001; patients: IG 3.9/10.8 vs 1.3/12.6; P < 0.001). Moreover, emergency management competence was increased after intervention as compared to controls (caregivers: IG 8.6/11.2 vs CG 1.2/10.8; P < 0.001; patients: 7.1/11.0 vs 1.1/11.1; P < 0.001). Intervention showed significant reduction of caregiver anxiety (-1.9/8.4 vs -0.7/7.5; P < 0.05). There were no significant changes in the depression scores. CONCLUSION: Structured patient education programmes may be beneficial in the management of anaphylaxis by increasing patients' empowerment to prevent and treat the disease.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Structured educational programmes for patients at risk for anaphylaxis have not yet been established. Patients and caregivers often lack adequate skills in managing the disease. METHODS: To investigate effects of structured patient education intervention on knowledge, emergency management skills and psychological parameters in patients with previous episodes of anaphylaxis and caregivers of affected children 95 caregivers (11 male, 84 female, mean age 37 years) of affected children and 98 patients (32 male, 66 female, mean age 47.5 years) were randomly assigned to an intervention (IG) or control group (CG) in a multicentre randomized controlled trial. The IG received two 3-h schooling modules of group education; the CG received standard auto-injector training only. Knowledge of anaphylaxis and emergency management competence in a validated training anaphylaxis situation as main outcome measures as well as secondary psychological parameters were assessed at baseline and 3 months after intervention. RESULTS: In comparison with controls, the intervention led to significant improvement of knowledge from baseline to 3-month follow-up (caregivers: IG 3.2/13.2 improvement/baseline vs CG 0.7/12.6; P < 0.001; patients: IG 3.9/10.8 vs 1.3/12.6; P < 0.001). Moreover, emergency management competence was increased after intervention as compared to controls (caregivers: IG 8.6/11.2 vs CG 1.2/10.8; P < 0.001; patients: 7.1/11.0 vs 1.1/11.1; P < 0.001). Intervention showed significant reduction of caregiver anxiety (-1.9/8.4 vs -0.7/7.5; P < 0.05). There were no significant changes in the depression scores. CONCLUSION: Structured patient education programmes may be beneficial in the management of anaphylaxis by increasing patients' empowerment to prevent and treat the disease.
Authors: Felipe Fernandez-Mendez; Nieves Maria Saez-Gallego; Roberto Barcala-Furelos; Cristian Abelairas-Gomez; Alexis Padron-Cabo; Alexandra Perez-Ferreiros; Carlos Garcia-Magan; Jose Moure-Gonzalez; Onofre Contreras-Jordan; Antonio Rodriguez-Nuñez Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Danielle Boehmer; Barbara Schuster; Julia Krause; Ulf Darsow; Tilo Biedermann; Alexander Zink Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 4.084
Authors: Johannes Ring; Kirsten Beyer; Tilo Biedermann; Andreas Bircher; Matthias Fischer; Thomas Fuchs; Axel Heller; Florian Hoffmann; Isidor Huttegger; Thilo Jakob; Ludger Klimek; Matthias V Kopp; Claudia Kugler; Lars Lange; Oliver Pfaar; Ernst Rietschel; Franziska Rueff; Sabine Schnadt; Roland Seifert; Britta Stöcker; Regina Treudler; Christian Vogelberg; Thomas Werfel; Margitta Worm; Helmut Sitter; Knut Brockow Journal: Allergo J Int Date: 2021-01-28
Authors: Margitta Worm; Imke Reese; Barbara Ballmer-Weber; Kirsten Beyer; Stephan C Bischoff; Martin Classen; Peter J Fischer; Thomas Fuchs; Isidor Huttegger; Uta Jappe; Ludger Klimek; Berthold Koletzko; Lars Lange; Ute Lepp; Vera Mahler; Bodo Niggemann; Ute Rabe; Martin Raithel; Joachim Saloga; Christiane Schäfer; Sabine Schnadt; Jens Schreiber; Zsolt Szépfalusi; Regina Treudler; Martin Wagenmann; Bernhard Watzl; Thomas Werfel; Torsten Zuberbier; Jörg Kleine-Tebbe Journal: Allergo J Int Date: 2015-11-07
Authors: F Estelle R Simons; Motohiro Ebisawa; Mario Sanchez-Borges; Bernard Y Thong; Margitta Worm; Luciana Kase Tanno; Richard F Lockey; Yehia M El-Gamal; Simon Ga Brown; Hae-Sim Park; Aziz Sheikh Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 4.084
Authors: Johannes Ring; Kirsten Beyer; Tilo Biedermann; Andreas Bircher; Matthias Fischer; Axel Heller; Isidor Huttegger; Thilo Jakob; Ludger Klimek; Matthias V Kopp; Claudia Kugler; Lars Lange; Oliver Pfaar; Ernst Rietschel; Franziska Rueff; Sabine Schnadt; Roland Seifert; Britta Stöcker; Regina Treudler; Christian Vogelberg; Thomas Werfel; Margitta Worm; Helmut Sitter; Knut Brockow Journal: Allergo J Date: 2021-02-12