Literature DB >> 25407505

First- versus second-generation electronic cigarettes: predictors of choice and effects on urge to smoke and withdrawal symptoms.

Lynne Dawkins1, Catherine Kimber, Yasothani Puwanesarasa, Kirstie Soar.   

Abstract

AIMS: To (1) estimate predictors of first- versus second-generation electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) choice; and (2) determine whether a second-generation device was (i) superior for reducing urge to smoke and withdrawal symptoms (WS) and (ii) associated with enhanced positive subjective effects.
DESIGN: Mixed-effects experimental design. Phase 1: reason for e-cigarette choice was assessed via questionnaire. Phase 2: participants were allocated randomly to first- or second-generation e-cigarette condition. Urge to smoke and WS were measured before and 10 minutes after taking 10 e-cigarette puffs.
SETTING: University of East London, UK. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 97 smokers (mean age 26; standard deviation 8.7; 54% female). MEASUREMENTS: Single-item urge to smoke scale to assess craving and the Mood and Physical Symptoms Scale (MPSS) to assess WS. Subjective effects included: satisfaction, hit, 'felt like smoking' and 'would use to stop smoking' (yes versus no response).
FINDINGS: Equal numbers chose each device, but none of the predictor variables (gender, age, tobacco dependence, previous e-cigarette use) accounted for choice. Only baseline urge to smoke/WS predicted urge to smoke/WS 10 minutes after use (B =0.38; P <0.001 and B =0.53; P <0.001). E-cigarette device was not a significant predictor. Those using the second-generation device were more likely to report satisfaction and use in a quit attempt (χ(2)  = 12.10, P =0.001 and χ(2)  = 5.53, P =0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: First- and second-generation electronic cigarettes appear to be similarly effective in reducing urges to smoke during abstinence, but second-generation devices appear to be more satisfying to users.
© 2014 Society for the Study of Addiction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ENDS; Electronic cigarette; urge to smoke; withdrawal symptoms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25407505     DOI: 10.1111/add.12807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  47 in total

1.  ENDS Device Type and Initiation of Combustible Tobacco Products Among Adolescents.

Authors:  Aslesha Sumbe; Stephanie L Clendennen; Samuel C Opara; Christian D Jackson; Baojiang Chen; Anna V Wilkinson; Melissa B Harrell
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Evaluating Point of Sale Tobacco Marketing Using Behavioral Laboratory Methods.

Authors:  Jason D Robinson; David J Drobes; Thomas H Brandon; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10

3.  Developing Consistent and Transparent Models of E-cigarette Use: Reply to Glantz and Soneji et al.

Authors:  David T Levy; Ron Borland; Geoffrey T Fong; Andrea C Villanti; Raymond Niaura; Rafael Meza; Theodore R Holford; K Michael Cummings; David B Abrams
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 4.  Biomarkers of exposure to new and emerging tobacco delivery products.

Authors:  Suzaynn F Schick; Benjamin C Blount; Peyton Jacob; Najat A Saliba; John T Bernert; Ahmad El Hellani; Peter Jatlow; R Steven Pappas; Lanqing Wang; Jonathan Foulds; Arunava Ghosh; Stephen S Hecht; John C Gomez; Jessica R Martin; Clementina Mesaros; Sanjay Srivastava; Gideon St Helen; Robert Tarran; Pawel K Lorkiewicz; Ian A Blair; Heather L Kimmel; Claire M Doerschuk; Neal L Benowitz; Aruni Bhatnagar
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 5.464

5.  Exposure to passive nicotine vapor in male adolescent rats produces a withdrawal-like state and facilitates nicotine self-administration during adulthood.

Authors:  Marsida Kallupi; Giordano de Guglielmo; Estefania Larrosa; Olivier George
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.600

6.  Using Cognitive Interviewing to Better Assess Young Adult E-cigarette Use.

Authors:  Josephine T Hinds; Alexandra Loukas; Sherman Chow; Keryn E Pasch; Melissa B Harrell; Cheryl L Perry; Cristine Delnevo; Olivia A Wackowski
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.244

7.  Smoke and Vapor: Exploring the Terminology Landscape among Electronic Cigarette Users.

Authors:  Jennifer P Alexander; Blair N Coleman; Sarah E Johnson; Greta K Tessman; Cindy Tworek; Denise M Dickinson
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-07-01

8.  A Naturalistic, Randomized Pilot Trial of E-Cigarettes: Uptake, Exposure, and Behavioral Effects.

Authors:  Matthew J Carpenter; Bryan W Heckman; Amy E Wahlquist; Theodore L Wagener; Maciej L Goniewicz; Kevin M Gray; Brett Froeliger; K Michael Cummings
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Clinical Laboratory Evaluation of Electronic Cigarettes/Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Methodological Challenges.

Authors:  Melissa D Blank; Alison B Breland; Caroline O Cobb; Tory Spindle; Carolina Ramôa; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2016-10

10.  Randomized within-subject trial to evaluate smokers' initial perceptions, subjective effects and nicotine delivery across six vaporized nicotine products.

Authors:  Natalie Voos; Lisa Kaiser; Martin C Mahoney; Clara M Bradizza; Lynn T Kozlowski; Neal L Benowitz; Richard J O'Connor; Maciej L Goniewicz
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.